Cited by 251Retinal Development and DisordersNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsZebrafish Biomedical Research Applications

The Proneural Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Gene Ascl1a Is Required for Retina Regeneration

Open access
Fausett, Blake V., Gumerson, Jessica D., Goldman, Daniel·2008·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Unlike mammals, teleost fish can regenerate an injured retina, restoring lost visual function. Little is known of the molecular events that underlie retina regeneration. We previously found that in zebrafish, retinal injury stimulates Müller glia to generate multipotent α 1-tubulin (α 1T ) and pax6 -expressing progenitors for retinal repair. Here, we report the identification of a critical E-box in the α 1T promoter that mediates transactivation by achaete-scute complex-like 1a (ascl1a) during retina regeneration. More importantly, we show that ascl1a is essential for retina regeneration. Within 4 h after retinal injury, ascl1a is induced in Müller glia. Knockdown of ascl1a blocks the induction of α 1T and pax6 as well as Müller glial proliferation, consequently preventing the generation of retinal progenitors and their differentiated progeny. These data suggest ascl1a is required to convert quiescent Müller glia into actively dividing retinal progenitors, and that ascl1a is a key regulator in initiating retina regeneration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4853-07.2008

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fausett, B. V., Gumerson, J. D., & Goldman, D.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2008-01-30
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
1109-1117
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2059560084
Cited by
251
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Michigan
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY018132)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Keywords
retinal regeneration, Müller cells, Pax6, E-box promoter, retinal progenitor cells, zebrafish, retinal damage, glial cell proliferation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Neuroglia, Neurons, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Regeneration, Retina, Zebrafish, Signal Transduction, Helix-Loop-Helix Motifs, Zebrafish Proteins, Animals, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review