Cited by 297Indigenous Cultures and HistoryIndigenous Peoples' Rights and LawPolitical Systems and Governance

Imagined geographies: Sovereignty, indigenous space, and American Indian struggle

Biolsi, Thomas·2005·American Ethnologist

Abstract

In this article, I seek to complicate scholars' understanding of the “modular” form of the nation‐state by examining four kinds of indigenous political space that figure in contemporary American Indian struggle in the United States: (1) “tribal” or indigenous‐nation sovereignty on reservation homelands; (2) comanagement of off‐reservation resources and sites shared between tribal, federal, and state governments; (3) national indigenous space in which Indian people exercise portable rights beyond reservations; and (4) hybrid political space in which Indian people exercise dual citizenship and assert rights as tribal citizens under treaty and other federal Indian law, as U.S. citizens under the Constitution, and as social or cultural citizens within a multicultural U.S. society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/ae.2005.32.2.239

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sovereignty is the foundation of Indigenous nationhood, referring to the inherent right to self-governance and rights to self-determination over lands, waters, resources, citizenry, and territories.

    “Sovereignty is the foundation of Indigenous nationhood, as it refers to the inherent right to selfgovernance as well as rights to self-determination over lands, waters, resources, citizenry, and territories (Biolsi, 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biolsi, T.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Biolsi, Thomas
Venue
American Ethnologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-05
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
239-259
ISSN
  • 0094-0496 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1425
OpenAlex
W2116127710
Cited by
297
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 11
FWCI
77.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Ethnologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Systems and Governance
Keywords
Indigenous sovereignty, nation-state, tribal sovereignty, reservations, co-management, federal Indian law, treaty rights, dual citizenship, imaginary geography, multiculturalism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review