Cited by 38Scientific Computing and Data ManagementResearch Data Management PracticesBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

The evolution of standards and data management practices in systems biology

Open access
Stanford, Natalie J, Wolstencroft, Katherine, Golebiewski, Martin, Kania, Renate, Juty, Nick, Tomlinson, Christopher, Owen, Stuart, Butcher, Sarah +5 more·2015·Molecular Systems Biology

Abstract

A recent community survey conducted by Infrastructure for Systems Biology Europe (ISBE) informs requirements for developing an efficient infrastructure for systems biology standards, data and model management.[Image: see text]

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15252/msb.20156053

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BioModels is the world's largest repository of curated models and the third most used data resource after PubMed and Google Scholar among scientists who use modelling in their research.

    “BioModels is the world’s largest repository of curated models and is the third most used data resource after PubMed and Google Scholar among the scientists who use modelling in their research (Stanford et al., 2015; Szigeti et al., 2018).”

    From BioModels Parameters: a treasure trove of parameter values from published systems biology models (2020) · cites this paper as Stanford et al., 2015

    The Introduction glossary describes BioModels as a database for curated and non-curated computational models, and “Sharing in public repositories” calls it the most popular models database among respondents (33%). Neither passage establishes that it is the world’s largest curated-model repository or ranks it third after PubMed and Google Scholar. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 11 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stanford, N. J., Wolstencroft, K., Golebiewski, M., Kania, R., Juty, N., Tomlinson, C., Owen, S., Butcher, S., Hermjakob, H., Le Novère, N., Mueller, W., Snoep, J., & Goble, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (DE)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Stanford, Natalie J
Venue
Molecular Systems Biology
Published
2015-12-01
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
851-851
ISSN
1744-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2301320572
Cited by
38
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
12.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Systems Biology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (312455)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (0315749, FKZ 0315749)
  • Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
  • Klaus Tschira Stiftung
  • German Network for Bioinformatics Infrastructure
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/C519670/1, BB/E006248/1, BB/M013189/1, BBS/E/B/000C0419, BB/I004637/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
data management, model management, research infrastructure, community survey, standards development, data sharing
MeSH terms
Database Management Systems, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Software, Systems Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review