Cited by 211Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsOphthalmology and Eye DisordersThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

A systematic review of drug therapy for Graves’ hyperthyroidism

Abraham, Prakash, Avenell, Alison, Park, Christine M, Watson, Wendy A, Bevan, John S·2005·European Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

We assessed the effects of dose, regimen and duration of anti-thyroid drug therapy for Graves’ thyrotoxicosis on recurrence of hyperthyroidism, course of ophthalmopathy, adverse effects, health-related quality of life and economic outcomes. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We identified RCTs regardless of language or publication status by searching six databases, and trial registries. Dual, blinded data abstraction and quality assessment were undertaken. Trials included provided therapy for at least 6 months with follow-up at least 1 year after drug cessation. Fixed or random effects meta-analyses were used to combine study data. Twelve trials compared a Block-Replace regimen (requiring a higher dose of anti-thyroid drug treatment) with a Titration regimen. Overall, there was no significant difference between the regimens for relapse of hyperthyroidism (relative risk (RR) = 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.03). Participants were more likely to withdraw due to adverse events with a Block-Replace regimen (RR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.85). Prescribing replacement thyroxine, either with the anti-thyroid drug treatment, or after this was completed, had no significant effect on relapse. Limited evidence suggested 12–18 months of anti-thyroid drug treatment should be used. The titration regimen appeared as effective as the Block-Replace regimen, and was associated with fewer adverse effects. However, relapse rates over 50% and high participant drop-out rates in trials mean that the results should be interpreted with caution, and may suggest that other strategies for the management of Graves’ disease, such as radioiodine, should be considered more frequently as first-line therapy. There were no data on the course of ophthalmopathy, health-related quality of life and economic outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/eje.1.01993

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abraham, P., Avenell, A., Park, C. M., Watson, W. A., & Bevan, J. S.
Affiliations
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Abraham, Prakash
Venue
European Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2005-10
Volume
153
Issue
4
Pages
489-498
ISSN
  • 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-683X
OpenAlex
W2134761697
Cited by
211
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Keywords
Graves' disease, Graves' hyperthyroidism, antithyroid drug therapy, hyperthyroidism recurrence, Graves' ophthalmopathy, adverse drug reactions, treatment duration, health-related quality of life, economic outcomes
MeSH terms
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Therapy, Combination, Graves Disease, Humans, Antithyroid Agents, Thyroxine, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review