The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large-Scale Screening for Targeted Knockouts in the Caenorhabditis elegans Genome
Open accessAbstract
The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is a powerful model system to study contemporary biological problems. This system would be even more useful if we had mutations in all the genes of this multicellular metazoan. The combined efforts of the C. elegans Deletion Mutant Consortium and individuals within the worm community are moving us ever closer to this goal. At present, of the 20,377 protein-coding genes in this organism, 6764 genes with associated molecular lesions are either deletions or null mutations (WormBase WS220). Our three laboratories have contributed the majority of mutated genes, 6841 mutations in 6013 genes. The principal method we used to detect deletion mutations in the nematode utilizes polymerase chain reaction (PCR). More recently, we have used array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH) to detect deletions across the entire coding part of the genome and massively parallel short-read sequencing to identify nonsense, splicing, and missense defects in open reading frames. As deletion strains can be frozen and then thawed when needed, these strains will be an enduring community resource. Our combined molecular screening strategies have improved the overall throughput of our gene-knockout facilities and have broadened the types of mutations that we and others can identify. These multiple strategies should enable us to eventually identify a mutation in every gene in this multicellular organism. This knowledge will usher in a new age of metazoan genetics in which the contribution to any biological process can be assessed for all genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans
Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M. K., Kostas, S. A., Driver, S. E., & Mello, C. C. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35888 · Cited by 15,429
The functions of animal microRNAs
Ambros, V. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02871 · Cited by 10,728
The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
Sulston, J. E., Schierenberg, E., White, J. G., & Thomson, J. N. (1983) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/0012-1606(83)90201-4 · Cited by 4,199
TAL effectors: customizable proteins for DNA targeting
Bogdanove, A. J., & Voytas, D. F. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1204094 · Cited by 984
The structure of the ventral nerve cord of Caenorhabditis elegans
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., & Brenner, S. (1976) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1976.0086 · Cited by 616
Most Caenorhabditis elegans microRNAs Are Individually Not Essential for Development or Viability
Miska, E. A., Alvarez-Saavedra, E., Abbott, A. L., Lau, N. C., Hellman, A. B., McGonagle, S. M., Bartel, D. P., Ambros, V. R., & Horvitz, H. R. (2007) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030215 · Cited by 484 · cited 2×
“Just over 40% of these genes have been deleted, and most do not display an overt phenotype (Miska et al. 2007).”
BackgroundMethod
Cited by
Kinesin-2 autoinhibition requires elbow phosphorylation
Chen, G., Guo, Z., Zhu, Z., Xie, S., Zhou, T., & Ou, G. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.103648.3 · Cited by 4
Hecquet, T., Arbogast, N., Suhner, D., Goetz, A., Amann, G., Yürekli, S., Marangoni, F., Quintin, S., Greve, J. N., Di Donato, N., et al. (2025) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.113652 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- The C. elegans Deletion Mutant Consortium
- Venue
- G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-11-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1415-1425
- ISSN
- 2160-1836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3145751116
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large-Scale Screening for Targeted Knockouts in the Caenorhabditis elegans Genome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/g3.112.003830
- The paper
- The C. elegans Deletion Mutant Consortium. (2012). Large-Scale Screening for Targeted Knockouts in the Caenorhabditis elegans Genome. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.112.003830
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.