The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Mixed-Model Approach to Association Mapping Using Pedigree Information With an Illustration of Resistance to Phytophthora infestans in Potato
Open accessAbstract
Association or linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based mapping strategies are receiving increased attention for the identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) in plants as an alternative to more traditional, purely linkage-based approaches. An attractive property of association approaches is that they do not require specially designed crosses between inbred parents, but can be applied to collections of genotypes with arbitrary and often unknown relationships between the genotypes. A less obvious additional attractive property is that association approaches offer possibilities for QTL identification in crops with hard to model segregation patterns. The availability of candidate genes and targeted marker systems facilitates association approaches, as will appropriate methods of analysis. We propose an association mapping approach based on mixed models with attention to the incorporation of the relationships between genotypes, whether induced by pedigree, population substructure, or otherwise. Furthermore, we emphasize the need to pay attention to the environmental features of the data as well, i.e., adequate representation of the relations among multiple observations on the same genotypes. We illustrate our modeling approach using 25 years of Dutch national variety list data on late blight resistance in the genetically complex crop of potato. As markers, we used nucleotide binding-site markers, a specific type of marker that targets resistance or resistance-analog genes. To assess the consistency of QTL identified by our mixed-model approach, a second independent data set was analyzed. Two markers were identified that are potentially useful in selection for late blight resistance in potato.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data
Verbeke, G. (1997) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2294-1_3 · Cited by 3,506
Genomic Control for Association Studies
Devlin, B., & Roeder, K. (1999) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00997.x · Cited by 3,162
Mixed models including environmental covariables for studying QTL by environment interaction
Malosetti, M., Voltas, J., Romagosa, I., Ullrich, S. E., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2004) · Euphytica · doi:10.1023/b:euph.0000040511.46388.ef · Cited by 167
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- 2002, Plant Breed., 121, 281, 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.730285.x · DOI · Paper page
- 2002, Plant J., 30, 361, 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2001.01292.x · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, Mol. Plant Microbe Interact., 17, 1126, 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.10.1126 · doi:10.1094/mpmi.2004.17.10.1126
- 2005, Theor. Appl. Genet., 110, 660, 10.1007/s00122-004-1891-6 · doi:10.1007/s00122-004-1891-6
- 2005, Euphytica, 142, 169, 10.1007/s10681-005-1681-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 1999, Mol. Breed., 5, 387, 10.1023/A:1009601427062 · doi:10.1023/a:1009601427062
- 1993, Genetics, 134, 943, 10.1093/genetics/134.3.943 · DOI · Paper page
- 2002, Nat. Rev. Genet., 3, 22, 10.1038/nrg701 · DOI · Paper page
- 1997, Heredity, 79, 162, 10.1038/hdy.1997.139 · DOI
- 2001, Theor. Popul. Biol., 60, 155, 10.1006/tpbi.2001.1542 · DOI · Paper page
- 2000, Mol. Breed., 6, 25, 10.1023/A:1009648408198 · doi:10.1023/a:1009648408198
- 2003, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 54, 357, 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134907 · DOI · Paper page
- 2001, Heredity, 87, 530, 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00937.x · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00937.x
- 2004, Mol. Breed., 13, 93, 10.1023/B:MOLB.0000012878.89855.df · DOI
- 1997, Theor. Appl. Genet., 95, 1181, 10.1007/s001220050679 · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, Mol. Plant Microbe Interact., 17, 428, 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.4.428 · doi:10.1094/mpmi.2004.17.4.428
- 2002, Plant Mol. Biol., 48, 511, 10.1023/A:1014875800036 · DOI
- 2001, Trends Plant Sci., 6, 337, 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02017-9 · DOI
- 1992, J. Anim. Sci., 70, 2000, 10.2527/1992.7072000x · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, Genetics, 168, 435, 10.1534/genetics.104.026831 · DOI · Paper page
- 1999, Genetics, 152, 1753, 10.1093/genetics/152.4.1753 · DOI · Paper page
- 1998, Mol. Gen. Genet., 259, 150, 10.1007/s004380050800 · doi:10.1007/s004380050800
- 2003, Genetics, 163, 1153, 10.1093/genetics/163.3.1153 · DOI · Paper page
- 1999, Mol. Breed., 5, 399, 10.1023/A:1009623212180 · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, Theor. Appl. Genet., 109, 508, 10.1007/s00122-004-1666-0 · DOI
- 2001, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 69, 1, 10.1086/321275 · DOI · Paper page
- 2000, Genetics, 155, 945, 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 · DOI · Paper page
- 2000, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 67, 170, 10.1086/302959 · DOI · Paper page
- 2001, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 11479, 10.1073/pnas.201394398 · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, Theor. Appl. Genet., 108, 217, 10.1007/s00122-003-1431-9 · doi:10.1007/s00122-003-1431-9
- 2004, Mol. Genet. Genomics, 271, 522, 10.1007/s00438-004-1010-z · DOI
- 2005, Mol. Breed., 15, 233, 10.1007/s11032-004-4824-9 · doi:10.1007/s11032-004-4824-9
- 2001, Nat. Genet., 28, 286, 10.1038/90135 · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, Theor. Appl. Genet., 109, 384, 10.1007/s00122-004-1642-8 · DOI
- 2003, Plant J., 36, 867, 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01934.x · DOI · Paper page
- 2003, Theor. Appl. Genet., 106, 317, 10.1007/s00122-002-1021-2 · doi:10.1007/s00122-002-1021-2
- 2002, Genetics, 160, 1203, 10.1093/genetics/160.3.1203 · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, Plant Cell, 16, 2719, 10.1105/tpc.104.025700 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Commun. Stat. A, 22, 1079, 10.1080/03610919308813143 · DOI · Paper page
- 1999, Mol. Breed., 5, 505, 10.1023/A:1009684409326 · DOI · Paper page
- 2006, Nat. Genet., 38, 203, 10.1038/ng1702 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Association mapping: critical considerations shift from genotyping to experimental design
Myles, S., Peiffer, J., Brown, P. J., Ersoz, E. S., Zhang, Z., Costich, D. E., & Buckler, E. S. (2009) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.109.068437 · Cited by 857
Malosetti, M., Ribaut, J.-M., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00044 · Cited by 539
“, 2011), or association mapping panels (Malosetti et al., 2007; van Eeuwijk et al., 2010).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDaetwyler, H. D., Calus, M. P. L., Pong-Wong, R., de los Campos, G., & Hickey, J. M. (2013) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.112.147983 · Cited by 455
Modelling Crop Improvement in a G×E×M Framework via Gene–Trait–Phenotype Relationships
Messina, C., Hammer, G., Dong, Z., Podlich, D., & Cooper, M. (2009) · Crop Physiology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374431-9.00010-4 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Malosetti, M., van der Linden, C. G., Vosman, B., & van Eeuwijk, F. A.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-02-01
- Volume
- 175
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 879-889
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2155244871
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Mixed-Model Approach to Association Mapping Using Pedigree Information With an Illustration of Resistance to Phytophthora infestans in Potato. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.105.054932
- The paper
- Malosetti, M., van der Linden, C. G., Vosman, B., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2007). A Mixed-Model Approach to Association Mapping Using Pedigree Information With an Illustration of Resistance to Phytophthora infestans in Potato. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.054932
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.