Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 232

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Mixed-Model Approach to Association Mapping Using Pedigree Information With an Illustration of Resistance to Phytophthora infestans in Potato

Open access
Malosetti, M, van der Linden, C G, Vosman, B, van Eeuwijk, F A·2007·Genetics

Abstract

Association or linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based mapping strategies are receiving increased attention for the identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) in plants as an alternative to more traditional, purely linkage-based approaches. An attractive property of association approaches is that they do not require specially designed crosses between inbred parents, but can be applied to collections of genotypes with arbitrary and often unknown relationships between the genotypes. A less obvious additional attractive property is that association approaches offer possibilities for QTL identification in crops with hard to model segregation patterns. The availability of candidate genes and targeted marker systems facilitates association approaches, as will appropriate methods of analysis. We propose an association mapping approach based on mixed models with attention to the incorporation of the relationships between genotypes, whether induced by pedigree, population substructure, or otherwise. Furthermore, we emphasize the need to pay attention to the environmental features of the data as well, i.e., adequate representation of the relations among multiple observations on the same genotypes. We illustrate our modeling approach using 25 years of Dutch national variety list data on late blight resistance in the genetically complex crop of potato. As markers, we used nucleotide binding-site markers, a specific type of marker that targets resistance or resistance-analog genes. To assess the consistency of QTL identified by our mixed-model approach, a second independent data set was analyzed. Two markers were identified that are potentially useful in selection for late blight resistance in potato.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.105.054932

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 2002, Plant Breed., 121, 281, 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.730285.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2002, Plant J., 30, 361, 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2001.01292.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2004, Mol. Plant Microbe Interact., 17, 1126, 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.10.1126 · doi:10.1094/mpmi.2004.17.10.1126
  4. 2005, Theor. Appl. Genet., 110, 660, 10.1007/s00122-004-1891-6 · doi:10.1007/s00122-004-1891-6
  5. 2005, Euphytica, 142, 169, 10.1007/s10681-005-1681-5 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 1999, Mol. Breed., 5, 387, 10.1023/A:1009601427062 · doi:10.1023/a:1009601427062
  7. 1993, Genetics, 134, 943, 10.1093/genetics/134.3.943 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2002, Nat. Rev. Genet., 3, 22, 10.1038/nrg701 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 1997, Heredity, 79, 162, 10.1038/hdy.1997.139 · DOI
  10. 2001, Theor. Popul. Biol., 60, 155, 10.1006/tpbi.2001.1542 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2000, Mol. Breed., 6, 25, 10.1023/A:1009648408198 · doi:10.1023/a:1009648408198
  12. 2003, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 54, 357, 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134907 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 2001, Heredity, 87, 530, 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00937.x · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00937.x
  14. 2004, Mol. Breed., 13, 93, 10.1023/B:MOLB.0000012878.89855.df · DOI
  15. 1997, Theor. Appl. Genet., 95, 1181, 10.1007/s001220050679 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 2004, Mol. Plant Microbe Interact., 17, 428, 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.4.428 · doi:10.1094/mpmi.2004.17.4.428
  17. 2002, Plant Mol. Biol., 48, 511, 10.1023/A:1014875800036 · DOI
  18. 2001, Trends Plant Sci., 6, 337, 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02017-9 · DOI
  19. 1992, J. Anim. Sci., 70, 2000, 10.2527/1992.7072000x · DOI · Paper page
  20. 2004, Genetics, 168, 435, 10.1534/genetics.104.026831 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 1999, Genetics, 152, 1753, 10.1093/genetics/152.4.1753 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 1998, Mol. Gen. Genet., 259, 150, 10.1007/s004380050800 · doi:10.1007/s004380050800
  23. 2003, Genetics, 163, 1153, 10.1093/genetics/163.3.1153 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 1999, Mol. Breed., 5, 399, 10.1023/A:1009623212180 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 2004, Theor. Appl. Genet., 109, 508, 10.1007/s00122-004-1666-0 · DOI
  26. 2001, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 69, 1, 10.1086/321275 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 2000, Genetics, 155, 945, 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 2000, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 67, 170, 10.1086/302959 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 2001, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 11479, 10.1073/pnas.201394398 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 2004, Theor. Appl. Genet., 108, 217, 10.1007/s00122-003-1431-9 · doi:10.1007/s00122-003-1431-9
  31. 2004, Mol. Genet. Genomics, 271, 522, 10.1007/s00438-004-1010-z · DOI
  32. 2005, Mol. Breed., 15, 233, 10.1007/s11032-004-4824-9 · doi:10.1007/s11032-004-4824-9
  33. 2001, Nat. Genet., 28, 286, 10.1038/90135 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 2004, Theor. Appl. Genet., 109, 384, 10.1007/s00122-004-1642-8 · DOI
  35. 2003, Plant J., 36, 867, 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01934.x · DOI · Paper page
  36. 2003, Theor. Appl. Genet., 106, 317, 10.1007/s00122-002-1021-2 · doi:10.1007/s00122-002-1021-2
  37. 2002, Genetics, 160, 1203, 10.1093/genetics/160.3.1203 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 2004, Plant Cell, 16, 2719, 10.1105/tpc.104.025700 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 1993, Commun. Stat. A, 22, 1079, 10.1080/03610919308813143 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 1999, Mol. Breed., 5, 505, 10.1023/A:1009684409326 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 2006, Nat. Genet., 38, 203, 10.1038/ng1702 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 232

Metadata

Authors
Malosetti, M., van der Linden, C. G., Vosman, B., & van Eeuwijk, F. A.
Venue
Genetics
Published
2007-02-01
Volume
175
Issue
2
Pages
879-889
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W2155244871
Cited by
232
References
3
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Mixed-Model Approach to Association Mapping Using Pedigree Information With an Illustration of Resistance to Phytophthora infestans in Potato. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.105.054932
The paper
Malosetti, M., van der Linden, C. G., Vosman, B., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2007). A Mixed-Model Approach to Association Mapping Using Pedigree Information With an Illustration of Resistance to Phytophthora infestans in Potato. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.054932

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.