Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 932

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maize association population: a high‐resolution platform for quantitative trait locus dissection

Flint‐Garcia, Sherry A., Thuillet, Anne‐Céline, Yu, Jianming, Pressoir, Gael, Romero, Susan M., Mitchell, Sharon E., Doebley, John, Kresovich, Stephen, Goodman, Major M., Buckler, Edward S.·2005·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Crop improvement and the dissection of complex genetic traits require germplasm diversity. Although this necessary phenotypic variability exists in diverse maize, most research is conducted using a small subset of inbred lines. An association population of 302 lines is now available – a valuable research tool that captures a large proportion of the alleles in cultivated maize. Provided that appropriate statistical models correcting for population structure are included, this tool can be used in association analyses to provide high‐resolution evaluation of multiple alleles. This study describes the population structure of the 302 lines, and investigates the relationship between population structure and various measures of phenotypic and breeding value. On average, our estimates of population structure account for 9.3% of phenotypic variation, roughly equivalent to a major quantitative trait locus (QTL), with a high of 35%. Inclusion of population structure in association models is critical to meaningful analyses. This new association population has the potential to identify QTL with small effects, which will aid in dissecting complex traits and in planning future projects to exploit the rich diversity present in maize.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02591.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Beavis W.D., 1994, Proceedings of the Annual Corn and Sorghum Industry Research Conference, 250
  2. Belkhir K., 2001, genetix, Software (Windows) for Population Genetics
  3. 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00238-8 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1093/genetics/138.3.963 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1534/genetics.104.028993 · DOI
  6. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01576.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. Falconer D.S., 1996, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics
  8. Felsenstein J., 1993, PHYLIP – Phylogeny Inference Package, Version 3.5c
  9. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134907 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.2135/1993.compilationofnorthamerican · DOI
  11. 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400040013x · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1017/S0016672300004857 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003963 · DOI
  14. Holland J.B., 2003, Estimating and interpreting heritability for plant breeding: an update, Plant Breed. Rev., 22, 9
  15. 10.2135/cropsci2003.8290 · DOI
  16. Knowler W.C., 1988, Gm3−5,13,14 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: an association in American Indians with genetic admixture, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 43, 520
  17. 10.1093/genetics/124.3.743 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1023/A:1014893521186 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1093/genetics/165.4.2117 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1101/gr.9.8.720 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1073/pnas.052125199 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1105/tpc.012526 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02396.x · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1086/302959 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00240-6 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1002/1098-2272(200101)20:1<4::AID-GEPI2>3.0.CO;2-T · doi:10.1002/1098-2272(200101)20:1<4::aid-gepi2>3.0.co;2-t
  27. 10.1073/pnas.201394398 · DOI · Paper page
  28. SAS Institute, 1999, SAS Proprietary Software Release 8.2
  29. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2000.01122.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1093/genetics/139.1.457 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1007/s00122-005-1973-0 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.151244298 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1038/90135 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1385/1-59259-413-1:123 · DOI
  35. 10.1105/tpc.104.025700 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1949.tb02451.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 932

Metadata

Authors
Flint‐Garcia, S. A., Thuillet, A., Yu, J., Pressoir, G., Romero, S. M., Mitchell, S. E., Doebley, J., Kresovich, S., Goodman, M. M., & Buckler, E. S.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11-24
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1054-1064
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2142486812
Cited by
932
References
3
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maize association population: a high‐resolution platform for quantitative trait locus dissection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02591.x
The paper
Flint‐Garcia, S. A., Thuillet, A., Yu, J., Pressoir, G., Romero, S. M., Mitchell, S. E., Doebley, J., Kresovich, S., Goodman, M. M., & Buckler, E. S. (2005). Maize association population: a high‐resolution platform for quantitative trait locus dissection. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02591.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.