The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parentage and Sibship Inference From Multilocus Genotype Data Under Polygamy
Open accessAbstract
Likelihood methods have been developed to partition individuals in a sample into sibling clusters using genetic marker data without parental information. Most of these methods assume either both sexes are monogamous to infer full sibships only or only one sex is polygamous to infer full sibships and paternal or maternal (but not both) half sibships. We extend our previous method to the more general case of both sexes being polygamous to infer full sibships, paternal half sibships, and maternal half sibships and to the case of a two-generation sample of individuals to infer parentage jointly with sibships. The extension not only expands enormously the scope of application of the method, but also increases its statistical power. The method is implemented for both diploid and haplodiploid species and for codominant and dominant markers, with mutations and genotyping errors accommodated. The performance and robustness of the method are evaluated by analyzing both simulated and empirical data sets. Our method is shown to be much more powerful than pairwise methods in both parentage and sibship assignments because of the more efficient use of marker information. It is little affected by inbreeding in parents and is moderately robust to nonrandom mating and linkage of markers. We also show that individually much less informative markers, such as SNPs or AFLPs, can reach the same power for parentage and sibship inferences as the highly informative marker simple sequence repeats (SSRs), as long as a sufficient number of loci are employed in the analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Prospects for inferring pairwise relationships with single nucleotide polymorphisms
Glaubitz, J. C., Rhodes, O. E., & Dewoody, J. A. (2003) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01790.x · Cited by 136
Cited by
Computationally efficient sibship and parentage assignment from multilocus marker data
Wang, J. (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.111.138149 · Cited by 126
Self-citationFerrie, G. M., Cohen, O. R., Schutz, P., Leighty, K. A., Plasse, C., Bettinger, T. L., & Hoffman, E. A. (2013) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21090 · Cited by 25
The use and integration of molecular DNA information in conservation breeding programmes: a review
(2013) · The Journal of zoo and aquarium research · doi:10.19227/jzar.v1i2.31 · Cited by 17
Modesto, P., Biolatti, C., Favaro, L., Colussi, S., Peletto, S., Piga, S., Riina, M. V., Pessani, D., Trincas, E., Isaja, V., et al. (2018) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esy032 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J., & Santure, A. W.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-04-01
- Volume
- 181
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1579-1594
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2152778230
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parentage and Sibship Inference From Multilocus Genotype Data Under Polygamy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.108.100214
- The paper
- Wang, J., & Santure, A. W. (2009). Parentage and Sibship Inference From Multilocus Genotype Data Under Polygamy. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.100214
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.