Cited by 38Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesArchaeological and Geological Studies

Cannibalism in the Prehistoric American Southwest. Occurrence, Taphonomy, Explanation, and Suggestions for Standardized World Definition.

Open access
TURNER, CHRISTY G. II, TURNER, JACQUELINE A.·1995·Anthropological Science

Abstract

Intentionally-damaged human skeletal remains indicating cannibalism and/or violence have been found scattered on room floors and deposited in pits in more than 40 archeological sites in Arizona, Utah, Colorado, and New Mexico. Most of the bone assemblages were in Anasazi sites. Using five standardized taphonomic criteria (perimortem cut marks, intentional breakage, burning, anvil/hammerstone abrasions, and many missing vertebrae), 32 assemblages meet our minimal requirement for proposing cannibalism. In the 32 cannibalized series, the minimal number of individuals (MNI) ranges from 1 to 35. The average MNI is 9.2 per site. The total MNI is 295. All ages and both sexes are represented. The earliest grouping of sites with evidence of cannibalism date around A.D. 900; the latest single site, A.D. 1700. The average date for the 32 sites is ca. A.D. 1100. Two proximate explanations involve social pathology and/or Mesoamerican influence. Prehistoric Southwest cannibalism has been explained by starvation (3 sites), social pathology (several sites), and recently, as a violent form of institutionalized social control associated with the post-A.D. 900 rise of the highly complex Chacoan social and religious center in New Mexico, its regional road system, and the linked outlier multi-storied Great House communities that were built elsewhere in New Mexico and also in Colorado, Arizona, and Utah. There is no identifiable direct connection with cannibalism in Mexico. When considered with the sites evidencing extensive violence, Southwest cannibalism appears to be part of a socially-pathological and chaotic development that began in the Anasazi area, possibly triggered by Mesoamerican influences such as Mexican traders.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Turner and Turner synthesize evidence for prehistoric cannibalism in the American Southwest, arguing that 32 skeletal assemblages meet minimal taphonomic criteria and cluster in or near the Anasazi and Chacoan world. They propose violent social control, possibly linked to Mesoamerican influence, rather than famine or ritual mortuary behavior.

Key findings

  • More than 40 archeological sites in Arizona, Utah, Colorado, and New Mexico have scattered human remains suggesting violence and/or cannibalism; most are Anasazi. Using five standardized taphonomic criteria in the abstract (perimortem cut marks, intentional breakage, burning, anvil/hammerstone abrasions, and many missing vertebrae), 32 assemblages meet the minimal requirement for proposing cannibalism; the body and conclusion add polishing as a sixth minimal feature.
  • In the 32 cannibalized series, the minimum number of individuals (MNI) ranges from 1 to 35; average MNI is 9.2 per site; total MNI is 295. All ages and both sexes are represented. The earliest grouping dates around A.D. 900; the latest single site is A.D. 1700; the average date for the 32 sites is ca. A.D. 1100.
  • Sites are not randomly distributed: they occur only in or very near the Anasazi culture area, many within a day’s walk of post-A.D. 900 Chaco outliers or in Chaco Canyon itself. Explanations considered are starvation (3 sites), social pathology (several sites), and institutionalized violent social control tied to the Chacoan system.
  • There is no identifiable direct connection with cannibalism in Mexico. Two Arizona individuals with notched teeth suggest Mesoamerican travelers, since tooth modification is not a prehistoric Southwest Indian trait. The taphonomic signature of cannibalism matches that of game animal food remains, and there is no known Southwest ethnographic example of such extensive human body processing.

Methods

  • Regional taphonomic synthesis of prehistoric human skeletal remains from the American Southwest, drawing on museum and archeological collections and prior site reports; examines more than 40 sites and identifies 32 assemblages meeting the criteria.
  • Uses standardized taphonomic criteria—perimortem breakage/cut marks, anvil or hammerstone abrasions, burning, missing vertebrae, and polishing—plus contextual and regional distribution analysis; compares human bone damage to game animal bone refuse.
  • Also examines dental modification (notched teeth) in two Arizona burials as possible evidence of Mesoamerican travelers.

Limitations

  • Stated: precise cause of death cannot be determined for any of the human remains; the exact morphogenetic affinity of the notched-tooth individuals cannot be identified because of their incompleteness; more perimortem-damaged human remains between the Anasazi area and the Valley of Mexico are needed to demonstrate Mexican influence; ultimate explanations are not presently on the theoretical horizon.
  • Stated: there is no known Southwest ethnographic example of such extensive human body processing for mortuary, ritual, social pathological, or cannibalistic reasons; the ethnographic record also lacks any account of a mass burial.
  • Evident: identification rests on circumstantial taphonomic evidence; the six features also occur in game animal bone refuse, and the authors reject ritual or mortuary alternatives largely on contextual grounds rather than direct proof.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1537/ase.103.1

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

1 of 43 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Cannibalism in the Prehistoric American Southwest: Occurrence, Taphonomy, Explanation, and Suggestions for Standardized World Definition

    In the 32 cannibalized series, the minimal number of individuals (MNI) ranges from 1 to 35.

    “In the 32 cannibalized series, the minimal number of individuals (MNI) ranges from 1 to 35.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given
    § Cannibalism in the Prehistoric American Southwest: Occurrence, Taphonomy, Explanation, and Suggestions for Standardized World Definition

    Most of the bone assemblages were in Anasazi sites.

    “Most of the bone assemblages were in Anasazi sites.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Cannibalism in the Prehistoric American Southwest: Occurrence, Taphonomy, Explanation, and Suggestions for Standardized World Definition

    Human remains with evidence of cannibalism and/or violence have been found scattered on room floors and deposited in pits in more than 40 archeological sites in Arizona, Utah, Colorado, and New Mexico.

    “and/or violence have been found scattered on room floors and deposited in pits in more than 40 archeological sites in Arizona, Utah, Colorado, and New Mexico.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Cannibalism in the Prehistoric American Southwest: Occurrence, Taphonomy, Explanation, and Suggestions for Standardized World Definition

    The total MNI is 295.

    “The total MNI is 295.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Cannibalism in the Prehistoric American Southwest: Occurrence, Taphonomy, Explanation, and Suggestions for Standardized World Definition

    The average MNI is 9.2 per site.

    “The average MNI is 9.2 per site.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 22
  • May combine two claims. 18
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Cannibalism in the Prehistoric American Southwest: Occurrence, Taphonomy, Explanation, and Suggestions for Standardized World Definition

    Until recently, conflict and warfare were given little attention in the study of the evolution of Southwest cultures.

    “Until recently, conflict and warfare were given little attention in the study of the evolution of South westcultures (Haas, 1990;Haas and Creamer, 1993;Hurst and Turner, 1993;Mackey and Green, 1979).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Haas, 1990

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Haas and Creamer, 1993 source
    • cites Hurst and Turner, 1993

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Cannibalism in the Prehistoric American Southwest: Occurrence, Taphonomy, Explanation, and Suggestions for Standardized World Definition

    There is no identifiable direct connection with cannibalism in Mexico.

    “There is no identifiable direct connection with cannibalism in Mexico.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Cannibalism in the Prehistoric American Southwest: Occurrence, Taphonomy, Explanation, and Suggestions for Standardized World Definition

    All ages and both sexes are represented.

    “All ages and both sexes are represented.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Cannibalism in the Prehistoric American Southwest: Occurrence, Taphonomy, Explanation, and Suggestions for Standardized World Definition

    In no instances can the precise cause of death be determined.

    “In no instances can the precise cause of death be determined.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Cannibalism in the Prehistoric American Southwest: Occurrence, Taphonomy, Explanation, and Suggestions for Standardized World Definition

    The fourth class of skeletons is very rare and has physical characteristics that differ completely from skeletons associated with natural or traumatic death.

    “The fourth class of skeletons is very rare and has physical characteristics that differ completely from skeletons associated with natural or traumatic death.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The perimortem bone breakage is intentional, usually followed by butchering as indicated by cut marks.

    “The perimortem (at or around the time of death) bone breakage is intentional (Fig. 2), usually followed by butchering as indicated by cut marks in Fig. 3.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Perimortem cut marks made with stone knives or sharp stone flakes have long been informally recognized on Southwest animal bones as indications of butchering.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The Polacca Wash charnel deposit is one of the largest assemblages.

    “This is one of the largest assemblages.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The basal sands beneath the bone bed at Polacca Wash show no signs of fire or previous human activity.

    “The basal sands beneath the bone bed show no signs of fire or previous human activity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The bone breakage on the Wupatki femur is post-mortem and unrelated to the perimortem abrasions.

    “Bone breakage is post-mortem and unrelated to perimortem abrasions”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Cannibalism in the Prehistoric American Southwest: Occurrence, Taphonomy, Explanation, and Suggestions for Standardized World Definition

    When considered with the sites evidencing extensive violence, Southwest cannibalism appears to be part of a socially-pathological and chaotic development that began in the Anasazi area, possibly triggered by Mesoamerican influences such as Mexican traders.

    “When considered with the sites evidenc ingextensive violence, Southwest cannibalism appears to be part of a socially -pathological and chaotic development that began in the Anasazi area, possibly triggered by Mesoamerican influences such as Mexican traders.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Cannibalism in the Prehistoric American Southwest: Occurrence, Taphonomy, Explanation, and Suggestions for Standardized World Definition

    Decapitation and taking of trophy heads as well as scalping were practiced as early as Basketmaker II times (200 B.C. to A.D. 400), presumably associated with conflict.

    “although decapitation and taking of trophy heads as well as scalping were practiced as early as Basketmaker II times (200 B.C. to A.D. 400), presumably associated with conflict (Kidder and Gurnsey, 1919;Wilcox and Haas, 1989).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kidder and Gurnsey, 1919

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Wilcox and Haas, 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Southwest cannibalism has been hypothesized by several workers when a minimum number of certain types of human-induced bone damage occur in a skeletal series.

    “Southwest cannibalism has been hypothesized by several workers when a minimum number of certain types of human-induced bone damage occur in a skeletal series (Figs.123456).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The pochteca trader idea has been difficult to demonstrate, and until recently no pochteca burials have been convincingly identified.

    “The idea has been difficult to demonstrate, and while archeologists have searched for pochteca burials, until recently none has been convincingly identified (Akins and Schelberg, 1984;Frisbie, 1978;Kelley, 1986;Nelson, 1986;Pepper, 1909;Reyman, 1978).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Akins and Schelberg, 1984

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Frisbie, 1978

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kelley, 1986

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Shell, as with other trade items, could simply pass from community to community without necessarily requiring a long-distance carrier or trader.

    “but shell, as with other trade items could simply pass from community to community without necessarily requiring a long distancecarrier or trader.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The pochteca trader idea has been a model for suggesting Mesoamerican influence on the development of Southwest culture.

    “One of the most interesting models for suggesting Mesoamerican influence on the development of Southwest culture has been the pochteca trader idea, advocated by the late Charles C. Di Peso (1974).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Di Peso, 1974

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There was Mexican influence on the cultural development in the Southwest.

    “Few Southwesternists doubt that there was Mexican influence on the cultural development in the Southwest.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cordell, 1984
    • cites Kelley and Kelley, 1975

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Lekson, 1986

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Cannibalism in the Prehistoric American Southwest: Occurrence, Taphonomy, Explanation, and Suggestions for Standardized World Definition

    Cannibalism occurs in wild non-human primates and many other vertebrate species.

    “recent careful research has shown without question that cannibalism occurs in wild non-human primates (Goodall, 1977; Nishida and Kankawa, 1985; Norikoshi, 1982), and many other vertebrate species (Elgar and Crespi , 1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Goodall, 1977 source
    • cites Nishida and Kankawa, 1985

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Norikoshi, 1982 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Cannibalism in the Prehistoric American Southwest: Occurrence, Taphonomy, Explanation, and Suggestions for Standardized World Definition

    These characteristics are believed to have resulted from acts of cannibalism.

    “These characteristics are believed to have resulted from acts of cannibalism, the subject of this paper.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Tooth modification is a well known Mesoamerican culture element, but not a feature of prehistoric Southwest Indians.

    “Tooth modification is a well known Mesoamerican culture element, but not a feature of prehistoric Southwest Indians.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ekholm, 1942
    • cites Powell and Powell, 1992

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Benfer, 1968

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The term pochteca is strictly-speaking inappropriate because it refers to a specialized class within Aztec society that traded exclusively to the south of the Valley of Mexico.

    “Although the term pochteca is strictly-speaking inappropriate because it refers to a specialized class within Aztec society that traded exclusively to the south of the Valley of Mexico (P. Weigand, personal communication, Oct. 29, 1993)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites P. Weigand, personal communication, Oct. 29, 1993

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These features are breakage, cutting, anvil or hammerstone abrasions, burning, missing vertebrae, and fragment polishing.

    “These features are breakage, cutting, anvil or hammerstone abrasions, burning, missing vertebrae, and fragment polishing (Turner and Turner, 1992).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Turner and Turner, 1992

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The oldest known example of dental modification north of the Valley of Mexico was found in Nuevo Leon and dates to 1750 B.P.

    “The oldest (1750 B.P.) known example of dental modification north of the Valley of Mexico was found in Nuevo Leon (Powell and Powell, 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Powell and Powell, 1992

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Maize was introduced early in the Southwest.

    “Maize was introduced early, and later there was trade in turquoise, macaws, shell, copper bells, and probably slaves, cotton cloth, and other valuables (Cordell, 1984;Harbottle and Weigand, 1992;Matson, 1991).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cordell, 1984
    • cites Harbottle and Weigand, 1992 source
    • cites Matson, 1991

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Turner and Morris (1970) are among the earliest published papers to illustrate cut human bone.

    “Turner and Morris (1970) are among the earliest published papers to illustrate cut human bone.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Turner and Morris (1970) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    It is not possible to identify the exact morphogenetic affinity of these individuals because of their incompleteness.

    “Unfortunately, it is not possible to identify the exact morphogenetic affinity of these individuals because of their incompleteness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Later there was trade in turquoise, macaws, shell, copper bells, and probably slaves, cotton cloth, and other valuables.

    “Maize was introduced early, and later there was trade in turquoise, macaws, shell, copper bells, and probably slaves, cotton cloth, and other valuables (Cordell, 1984;Harbottle and Weigand, 1992;Matson, 1991).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cordell, 1984
    • cites Harbottle and Weigand, 1992 source
    • cites Matson, 1991

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    With these physical items must also have come a torrent of Mesoamerican ideas and concepts.

    “With these physical items must also have come a torrent of Mesoamerican ideas and concepts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The two examples of Southwest tooth notching can only represent individuals who were either from Mesoamerica, or had been there during part of their lives and underwent the operation for notching.

    “Southwest tooth notching can only represent individuals who were either from Mesoamerica, or had been there during part of their lives and underwent the operation for notching.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Tooth notching is absent in the U.S. culture areas adjacent to the Southwest—California, Great Basin, and Plains.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Cannibalism in the Prehistoric American Southwest: Occurrence, Taphonomy, Explanation, and Suggestions for Standardized World Definition

    Throughout the Southwest the most common burial type was a single person interred in a flexed position with some form of grave offering.

    “Throughout the Southwest the most common burial type was a single person interred in a flexed position with some form of grave offering (Stanislawski, 1963).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stanislawski, 1963 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    There must have been prehistoric central Mexican traders, religious and military entrepreneurs, miners, pilgrims, and other sorts of explorers and adventurers in and out of the religious-military government circles who traveled and explored northward from central Mexico.

    “nevertheless, there must have been prehistoric central Mexican traders, religious and military entrepreneurs, miners, pilgrims, and other sorts of explorers and adventurers in and out of the religious -military government circles who traveled and explored northward from central”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Public displays of human sacrifice and cannibalism could have enhanced the amount and regularity of tribute in the Chacoan sphere of influence.

    “so what worked in the Valley of Mexico could just as well have enhanced the amount and regularity of tribute in the Chacoan sphere of influence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Much breakage occurs after muscle and other tissues have been removed, otherwise, the anvil or hammerstone abrasions could not occur, especially on the bones of the heavily fleshed upper arms and legs, and of the back.

    “Much breakage occurs after muscle and other tissues have been removed, otherwise, the anvil or hammerstone abrasions shown in Fig. 4 could not occur, especially on the bones of the heavily fleshed upper arms and legs, and of the back.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Part of the explanation for Anasazi cannibalism is tied to whatever explanation is finally worked out for the development of the Chaco Great House, road, and outlier sociopolitical system.

    “The relatively large number of Southwest sites evidencing probable cannibalism, and the concentration of these sites in and relatively near Chaco Great Houses and outliers, leads to the hypothesis that part of the explanation for Anasazi cannibalism is tied to whatever explanation is finally worked out for the development of the Chaco Great House, road, and outlier sociopolitical system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given

    The minimal six taphonomic features used to identify Southwest cannibalism herein are as definitive as circumstantial evidence can ever be.

    “In conclusion, we believe that the minimal six taphonomic features used to identify Southwest cannibalism herein are as definitive as circumstantial evidence can ever be.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The Aztec and earlier Toltec use of ritual human sacrifice and cannibalism for social control, as well as for religious and ideological functions, could have worked just as well for the same duel purposes in the Anasazi area as they did in Mesoamerica.

    “The Aztec and earlier Toltec use of ritual human sacrifice and cannibalism for social control, as well as for religious and ideological functions, could have worked just as well for the same duel purposes in the Anasazi area as they did in Mesoamerica.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    There are other qualities associated with the cannibal signature, especially good preservation, but the key six must be present before cannibalism can even be suggested.

    “We emphasize that there are other qualities associated with the cannibal signature, especially good preservation, but the key six must be present before cannibalism can even be suggested.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The region of the northern frontier of Mesoamerica where dental modification was practiced appears to be west Mexico, where prehistoric human sacrifice, cannibalism, and dental modification have been identified.

    “For the moment, that would appear to be in west Mexico where prehistoric human sacrifice, cannibalism, and dental modification have been identified (Pickering and Foster, 1994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pickering and Foster, 1994

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The adult male buried at the Grand Canal Hohokam site, Phoenix, central Arizona, originated in Mexico, where tooth modification was practiced.

    “suggesting this man originated in Mexico where tooth modification was practiced”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Dental modification is not a characteristic of prehistoric Southwest Indians.
38 of 38
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cannibalism in the literature has most often been treated or exemplified by isolated episodes.

    “Despite an abundant literature on the topic of cannibalism, it has most often been treated or exemplified by isolated episodes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Regional treatment of the topic and standardized taphonomic tests for proposing cannibalism have so far been developed only in the American Southwest.

    “Regional treatment of the topic and standardized taphonomic tests for proposing cannibalism have so far been developed only in the American Southwest.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Disturbed burials and isolated human bones and teeth are seldom studied from a taphonomic perspective.

    “They are seldom studied from a taphonomic perspective.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Perimortem cut marks made with stone knives or sharp stone flakes have long been informally recognized on Southwest animal bones as indications of butchering.

    “Perimortem cut marks made with stone knives or sharp stone flakes have long been informally recognized on Southwest animal bones as indications of butchering.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cut marks are usually v-shaped in cross-section, and within a cut mark, shelfing or irregularities can be recognized with a dissecting microscope.

    “Cut marks are usually v-shaped in cross-section, and within a cut mark, shelfing or irregularities can be recognized with a dissecting microscope.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Tooth notching is absent in the U.S. culture areas adjacent to the Southwest—California, Great Basin, and Plains.

    “Moreover, tooth notching is absent in the U.S. culture areas adjacent to the Southwest-California, Great Basin, and Plains.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The taphonomic signature of human cannibalism matches that of game animal food remains.

    “In actuality, the taphonomic signature of human cannibalism matches that of game animal food remains.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Dental modification is not a characteristic of prehistoric Southwest Indians.

    “Dental modification is not a characteristic of prehistoric Southwest Indians”
8 of 8

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Five criteria in the opening summary, but six required in the conclusion

    Major

    The opening summary says five taphonomic criteria were used to identify the 32 assemblages. The conclusion says six must be present before cannibalism can even be suggested, leaving the stated basis for identifying those assemblages inconsistent.

  • Pot-polishing is described as both optional and required

    Major

    The paper says polishing may occur depending on whether cooking vessels were available, but later requires all six features, including polishing, before cannibalism can be suggested.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Akins, N.J., and Schelberg, J.D. (1984) Evidence of organizational complexity as seen from the mortuary practices in Chaco Canyon. In Recent Research in Chaco Prehistory (Judge, W.J., and Schelberg, J.D., eds.), Reports, Chaco Center, No. 8, Nat. Park Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
  2. M.A. thesis, Dept. Anthropol., Brigham Young Univ., Provo, Utah.
  3. Barber, I. (1992) Archaeology, ethnography, and the record of Maori cannibalism before 1815: A critical review. J. Polynesian Soc. 101(3), 241-292.
  4. Benfer, R.A. (1968) An Analysis of a Prehistoric Skeletal Population, Casas Grandes, Chihuahua, Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Anthropol., Univ. Texas, Austin.
  5. Brown, B.A. (1984) Ochpaniztli in historical perspective. In Ritual Human Sacrifice in Mesoamerica (Boone, E.H., ed.), Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C., pp. 195-210.
  6. Brues, Alice (1946) Appendix B. Alkali Ridge skeletons, pathology and anomaly. In Archaeology of Alkali Ridge, Southeastern Utah, Brew, J.O., Peabody Museum, Harvard Univ., No. 21, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 327-329.
  7. Burton, S., and Chiang, O. (1993) Unspeakable crimes. Time 141(3), 35.
  8. Demarest, A. (1984) Overview: Mesoamerican human sacrifice in evolutionary perspective. In Ritual Human Sacrifice in Mesoamerica (Boone, E.H., ed.), Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C., pp. 227-247.
  9. Dice, M.H. (1993a) A Disarticulated Human Bone Assemblage from Leroux Wash, Arizona. M.A. thesis, Dept. Anthropol., Arizona State Univ., Tempe.
  10. Di Peso, C.C. (1974) Casas Grandes. A Fallen Trading Center of the Gran Chichimeca, Vol. 2. Northland Press, Flagstaff.
  11. Dittert, A.E., Jr., Eddy, F.W., and Dickey, B.L. (1966) LA 4195, Sambrito Village. In Prehistory in the Navajo Reservoir District Northwestern New Mexico (Eddy, F.W., ed.), Papers in Anthropol. No. 15, Part I. Museum of New Mexico, Santa Fe, pp. 230-254.
  12. Frisbie, Theodore R. (1978) High status burials in the Greater Southwest: An interpretative synthesis. In Across the Chichimec Sea: Papers in Honor off. Charles Kelley (Riley, CL., and Hedrick, B.C., eds.), Southern Illinois Univ. Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, pp. 202-227.
  13. Haas, J. (1990) Warfare and the evolution of tribal polities in the prehistoric Southwest. In The Anthropology of War (Haas, J. ed.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 171-189.
  14. Hagberg, E.B. (1939) Southwestern Indian Burial Practices. M.A. thesis, Univ. Arizona, Tucson.
  15. Harris, D.R. (1987) Aboriginal subsistence in a tropical rain forest environment: Food procurement, cannibalism, and population regulation in northeastern Australia. In Food and Evolution: Toward a Theory of Human Food Habits (Harris, M., and Ross, E.B., eds.), Temple Univ. Press, Philadelphia, pp. 357-385.
  16. Hurst, W.B., and Turner, C.G., II (1993) Rediscovering the "great discovery": Wetherill's first Cave 7 and its record of Basketmaker violence. In Anasazi Basketmaker. Papers from the 1990 Wetherill- Grand Gulch Symposium (Akins, V.M., ed.), Bureau of Land Management Cultural Resources Series No. 24. Salt Lake City, Utah, pp. 143-191.
  17. Kelley, E.A. (1978) The temple of the skulls at Alta Vista, Chalchihuites. In Across the Chichimec Sea: Papers in Honor off. Charles Kelley (Riley, C.L., and Hedrick, B.C., eds.), Southern Illinois Univ. Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, pp. 102-126.
  18. Kelley, J.C., and Kelley, E.A. (1975) An alternative hypothesis for the explanation of Anasazi culture history. In Collected Papers in Honor of Florence Hawley Ellis (Frisbie, T.R., ed.), Hooper Pub. Co., Norman, Okla., pp. 178-223.
  19. Liu, B. (translated by P. Link) (1993) An unnatural disaster. Review of Lishi de Yibufen (A Part of History) and Hongse Jinianbei (Red Memorial), by Zheng Yi. New York Review of Books 40(7), 2-6.
  20. Martinez Vargas, E., and Gonzalez Miranda, L.A. (1991) Una estructura funeraria Teotihuacana. In Teotihuacan 1980-1982. Nuevas Interpretaciones (Cabrera Castro, R., Rodriguez Garcia, I., and Morelos Garcia, N., coordinadores), Inst. Nacional de Antropol. e Historia, Mexico, D.F., pp. 327-333.
  21. Martin, P.S. (1929) The 1928 archaeological expedition of the State Historical Society of Colorado. Colorado Magazine 6(1), 1-35.
  22. Mathien, F.J. (1986) External contact and the Chaco Anasazi. In Ripples in the Chichimec Sea: New Considerations of Southwestern-Mesoamerican Interactions (Mathien, F.J., and McGuire, R.H., eds.), Southern Illinois Univ. Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, pp. 220-242.
  23. Matos Moctezuma, E. (1984) The Templo Mayor of Tenochtitlan: Economics and ideology. In Ritual Human Sacrifice in Mesoamerica (Boone, E.H., ed.), Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C., pp. 133-164.
  24. M.A. thesis, Dept. Anthropol., Arizona State University, Tempe.
  25. Nelson, R.S. (1986) Pochtecas and prestige: Mesoamerican artifacts in Hohokam Sites. In Ripples in the Chichimec Sea: New Considerations of Southwestern Mesoamerican Interactions (Mathien, F.J., and McGuire, R.H., eds.), Southern Illinois Univ. Press, Carbondale, pp. 154-182.
  26. Pepper, G.H. (1909) The exploration of a burial-room in Pueblo Bonito, New Mexico. In Putnam Anniversary Volume. Anthropological Essays (ed. not given), Stechert & Co., New York, pp. 196-252.
  27. Pickering, R.B., and MS. Foster (1994) A survey of prehistoric disease and trauma in northwest and west Mexico. Proc. Denver Museum of Nat. History Series 3(7), 1-14.
  28. Pijoan A., C.M., and Pastrana C., A. (1985) Evidencias de antropofagia y sacrificio humano en restos oseos. Advances en antropologia fisica, 2, INAH, Mexico, pp. 37-45.
  29. Ravesloot, J.C. (1988) Mortuary Practices and Social Differentiation at Casas Grandes, Chihuahua, Mexico, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson.
  30. Reyman, J.E. (1978) Pochteca burials at Anasazi sites? In Across the Chichimec Sea: Papers in Honor of J. Charles Kelley (Riley, C.L., and Hedrick, B.C., eds.), Southern Illinois Univ. Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, pp. 242-259.
  31. Riley, C.L. (1989) Warfare in the protohistoric Southwest: An overview. In Cultures in Conflict: Current Archaeological Perspectives (Tkaczuk, D.C., and Vivian, B.C., eds.), Proc. 20th Annual Conf. Chacmool., Univ. of Calgary Archaeol. Assoc., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, pp. 138-146.
  32. Romain B., and Alberto, J. (1987) La ofrenda no. 48 del Templo Major. Un caso de sacrificios infantiles. In The Aztec Templo Mayor (Boone, E.H., ed.), Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C., pp. 131-143.
  33. Shipman, J.H. (1980) Part 10. Human skeletal remains from the Salmon Ruin (LA 8846). Appendix 10.0. Basic data on skeletal remains from the Salmon site (LA 8846), New Mexico: Statewide and room 64W. In Investigations at the Salmon Ruins: The Structure of Chacoan Society in the Northern Southwest, Vol. IV (Irwin-Williams, C., and Shelley, P.H., eds.), Eastern New Mexico Univ. Print. Services, pp. 47-58.
  34. Sloane, W. (1992) Russian serial killer sentenced to death (Associated Press). State Press, Arizona State Univ., 76(38), 3.
  35. Sugiyama K., S. (1991) Descubrimientos de entierros y ofrendas dedicadas al Templo Viejo de Quetzalcoatl. In Teotihuacan 1980-1982 (Cabrera Castro, R., Rodriguez Garcia, I., and Morelos Garcia, N., coordinadores), Inst. Nacional de Antropol. e Historia, Mexico, D.F., pp. 275-326.
  36. Suzuki, H. (1966) Cannibalism of the Aeneolithic Yayoi period in Japan. Proc. 20th Joint Meeting, Anthropol. Soc. Nippon and Japanese Soc. Ethnol.
  37. Turner, C.G., II (1961) Appendix II. Human skeletons from the Coombs site: Skeletal and dental aspects. In The Coombs Site Part III, Summary and Conclusions (Lister R.H., and Lister, F.C.), Anthropol. Papers No. 41 (Glen Canyon Series No. 8), Dept. Anthropol., Univ. Utah, Salt Lake City, pp. 117-136.
  38. Turner, C.G., II (1983) Taphonomic reconstructions of human violence and cannibalism based on mass burials in the American Southwest. In Carnivores, Human Scavengers & Predators: A Question of Bone Technology (LeMoine, G.M., and MacEachern, AS., eds.), Archaeol. Assoc. Univ. Calgary, Calgary, Canada, pp. 219-240.
  39. Turner, C.G., II (1988) Appendix 2H. Another prehistoric Southwest mass human burial suggesting violence and cannibalism: Marshview Hamlet, Colorado. In Dolores Archaeological Program: Aceramic and Late Occupations at Dolores (Gross, G.T., and Kane, A.E., eds.), Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, pp. 81-83.
  40. Washburn, D.K. (1980) The Mexican connection: Cylinder jars from the Valley of Oaxaca. Transactions Illinois Academy Science 72(4), 70-82.
  41. White, T.D. (1988) Appendix C. Cottonwood Wash, southeastern Utah: The human osteology of Feature 3, FS#27, Site 42SA12209. In Salvage Excavations of 425A12209. Yellow Jacket, Colorado (Fetterman, J.K., Honeycutt, L., and Kuckelman, K., eds.), Woods Canyon Archaeologi calConsultants, Yellow Jacket, Colorado, pp. 1-7.
  42. White, T.D. (1991) Human Osteology, Academic Press, New York.
  43. Wiener, A.L. (1988) Appendix 2D. Human remains from Marshview Hamlet. In Delores Archaeo- logical Program. Aceramic and Late Occupations at Dolores (Gross, G.T. and Kane, A.E., eds.), Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado, pp. 71-72.
  44. Wilcox, D.R., and Haas, J. (n.d.) The reality of competition and conflict in the prehistoric Southwest. In The Organization and Evolution of Southwestern Society (Gumerman, G.J., ed.), School of American Research, Santa Fe (in press).
  45. Wilkerson, S.J.K. (1984) In search of the Mountain of Foam: Human sacrifice in eastern Mesoamerica. In Ritual Human Sacrifice in Mesoamerica (Boone, E.H., ed.) Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C., pp. 101-132.
  46. Windes, T. (1984) A new look at population in Chaco Canyon. In Recent Research on Chaco Prehistory (Judge, W.J., and Schelberg, J.D., eds.), Reports, Chaco Center, No. 8, Nat. Park Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico, pp. 75-87.
  47. Woodbury, R.B. (1979) Prehistory: Introduction. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 9, Southwest (Ortiz, A., ed.), Smithsonian Instit., Washington, D.C., pp. 22-30.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
TURNER, C. G. I., & TURNER, J. A.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Anthropological Science
Published
1995
Volume
103
Issue
1
Pages
1-22
ISSN
  • 0918-7960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1348-8570
OpenAlex
W1995111083
Cited by
38
References
55
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
16.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Anthropological Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • National Geographic Society
  • Arizona State University
  • National Museum of Natural History
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
cannibalism, Ancestral Puebloans, taphonomy, skeletal remains, Mesoamerican influence, social pathology, violence, minimum number of individuals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-17.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-17.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review