Cited by 21Digital Mental Health InterventionsPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsWorkplace Health and Well-being

A web-based training program using cognitive behavioral therapy to alleviate psychological distress among employees : randomized controlled pilot trial

Open access
Mori, Makiko, Tajima, Miyuki, Kimura, Risa, Sasaki, Norio, Somemura, Hironori, Ito, Yukio, Okanoya, June, Yamamoto, Megumi +2 more·2014·JMIR Research Protocols

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A number of psychoeducational programs based on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to alleviate psychological distress have been developed for implementation in clinical settings. However, while these programs are considered critical components of stress management education in a workplace setting, they are required to be brief and simple to implement, which can hinder development. OBJECTIVE: The intent of the study was to examine the effects of a brief training program based on CBT in alleviating psychological distress among employees and facilitating self-evaluation of stress management skills, including improving the ability to recognize dysfunctional thinking patterns, transform dysfunctional thoughts to functional ones, cope with stress, and solve problems. METHODS: Of the 187 employees at an information technology company in Tokyo, Japan, 168 consented to participate in our non-blinded randomized controlled study. The training group received CBT group education by a qualified CBT expert and 1 month of follow-up Web-based CBT homework. The effects of this educational program on the psychological distress and stress management skills of employees were examined immediately after completion of training and then again after 6 months. RESULTS: Although the training group did exhibit lower mean scores on the Kessler-6 (K6) scale for psychological distress after 6 months, the difference from the control group was not significant. However, the ability of training group participants to recognize dysfunctional thinking was significantly improved both immediately after training completion and after 6 months. While the ability of participants to cope with stress was not significantly improved immediately after training, improvement was noted after 6 months in the training group. No notable improvements were observed in the ability of participants to transform thoughts from dysfunctional to functional or in problem-solving skills. A sub-analysis of participants who initially exhibited clinically significant psychological distress (K6 score ≥5) showed that the mean K6 score was significantly improved immediately after training completion for the training group compared to the control group (-2.50 vs -0.07; mean difference 2.43, 95% CI 0.55-4.31; d=0.61), with this effect remaining even after 6 months (-3.49 vs -0.50; mean difference 2.99, 95% CI 0.70-5.29; d=0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a brief stress management program that combines group CBT education with Web-based CBT homework moderately alleviates the distress of employees with clinically significant psychological distress. In addition, the program might help improve employees' ability to evaluate their own stress management skills.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/resprot.3629

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mori et al.'s blended web-based CBT program produced a small significant improvement versus controls in the intervention group's ability to transform thoughts postintervention (d = 0.26).

    “A small significant improvement versus controls was observed in the intervention group's ability to transform thoughts postintervention (d = 0.26) and their ability to cope with stress at 6-month follow-up (d = 0.37).”
  • Among 73 participants with clinically significant levels of emotional distress at baseline, participants with distress in the intervention group reported significantly lower psychological distress scores postintervention compared with similar participants in the control group, with medium effect size (d = 0.61).

    “Participants with distress in the intervention group reported significantly lower psychological distress scores postintervention compared with similar participants in the control group with medium effect size (d = 0.61).”
  • Mori et al.'s blended web-based CBT program produced a small significant improvement versus controls in the intervention group's ability to cope with stress at 6-month follow-up (d = 0.37).

    “A small significant improvement versus controls was observed in the intervention group's ability to transform thoughts postintervention (d = 0.26) and their ability to cope with stress at 6-month follow-up (d = 0.37).”
  • The improvement in psychological distress among the 73 distressed participants was maintained at 6-month follow-up (d = 0.60).

    “Improvement was maintained at 6-month-follow-up (d = 0.60).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [48]Christensen H Griffiths KM Jorm AF Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial BMJ 2004 1 31 328 7434 265 10.1136/bmj.37945.566632.EE 14742346 14742346 PMC324455 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mori, M., Tajima, M., Kimura, R., Sasaki, N., Somemura, H., Ito, Y., Okanoya, J., Yamamoto, M., Nakamura, S., & Tanaka, K.
Affiliations
Kitasato University (JP)
Corresponding author
Mori, Makiko
Venue
JMIR Research Protocols
Published
2014-12-02
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
e70
ISSN
1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073362721
Cited by
21
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, online training, psychological distress, workplace stress management, workers, dysfunctional thinking, stress coping, group psychoeducation, Kessler-6, IT professionals, brief intervention, problem-solving skills, follow-up outcomes, attrition bias, workplace mental health promotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review