CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 207Cerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersInfant Development and Preterm CareNeonatal and fetal brain pathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enriched environments and motor outcomes in cerebral palsy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Morgan, Catherine, Novak, Iona, Badawi, Nadia·2013·PEDIATRICS
DOI 10.1542/peds.2012-3985
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neuroplasticity evidence from animals favors an early enriched environment for promoting optimal brain injury recovery. In infants, systematic reviews show environmental enrichment (EE) improves cognitive outcomes but the effect on motor skills is less understood. The objective of this review was to appraise the effectiveness evidence about EE for improving the motor outcomes of infants at high risk of cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (PubMed), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Education Resource Information Center, SocINDEX, and PsycINFO databases were searched for literature meeting inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trials; high risk of /diagnosis of CP; >25% participants ≤2 years; parent or infant interventions postdischarge; and motor outcomes reported. Data were extracted using the Cochrane protocol regarding participants, intervention characteristics, and outcomes. Methodological quality was assessed using risk of bias assessment and GRADE. RESULTS: A total of 226 studies were identified. After removing duplicates and unrelated studies, 16 full-text articles were reviewed, of which 7 studies met inclusion criteria. The risk of bias varied between studies with the more recent studies demonstrating the lowest risk. Enrichment interventions varied in type and focus, making comparisons difficult. A meta-analysis was conducted of studies that compared enrichment to standard care (n = 5), and totaled 150 infants. A small positive effect for enrichment was found; standardized mean difference 0.39 (95% confidence interval 0.05-0.72; I(2) = 3%; P = .02) CONCLUSIONS: EE looks promising for CP, and therefore high-quality studies with well-defined EE strategies are urgently required.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2012-3985

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 58 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 207

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Morgan, C., Novak, I., & Badawi, N.
Affiliations
  • Cerebral Palsy Alliance (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
ORCID
Venue
PEDIATRICS
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Published
2013-09-01
Volume
132
Issue
3
Pages
e735-e746
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
DOI
10.1542/peds.2012-3985
OpenAlex
W2059028608
Cited by
207
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline@ND (The University of Notre Dame) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
Keywords
environmental enrichment, cerebral palsy, motor outcome, neuroplasticity, motor development, early intervention, brain injury recovery
MeSH terms
Brain, Cerebral Palsy, Child, Preschool, Cognition Disorders, Education, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Psychomotor Disorders, Social Environment, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Physical Therapy Modalities, Mobility Limitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review