Cited by 130Child Nutrition and Water AccessEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentInfant Development and Preterm Care

Stimulation Interventions and Parenting in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Meta-analysis

Jeong, Joshua, Pitchik, Helen O., Yousafzai, Aisha K.·2018·PEDIATRICS

Abstract

CONTEXT: Early childhood stimulation interventions positively impact early child development (ECD) outcomes in low- and middle-income countries. However, trials have less comprehensively evaluated the effects of such parenting programs on caregivers’ skills and capacities. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of stimulation interventions on improving parenting outcomes. DATA SOURCES: Six electronic bibliographic databases. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials of stimulation interventions designed to improve ECD outcomes during the first 2 years of life that measured any maternal or parenting-related outcome after the start of the intervention. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers extracted data by using a structured form. RESULTS: Fifteen studies representing 13 unique randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) based on random-effects models revealed medium-to-large benefits of stimulation interventions for improving the home caregiving environment (n = 10; SMD = 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.77), mother-child interactions (n = 3; SMD = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.74), and maternal knowledge of ECD (n = 6; SMD = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.31). No significant difference was seen for maternal depressive symptoms (n = 9; SMD = −0.10; 95% CI, −0.23 to −0.03). LIMITATIONS: Limitations include heterogeneity across interventions, lack of standardized measures, and different time points of assessments across studies. CONCLUSIONS: Early childhood stimulation interventions improve several distinct aspects of maternal parenting. Improvements in parenting capacities may serve as key mechanisms by which these programs benefit ECD outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2017-3510

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeong, J., Pitchik, H. O., & Yousafzai, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Jeong, Joshua
Venue
PEDIATRICS
Published
2018-04-01
Volume
141
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2790883626
Cited by
130
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
parent training, early childhood development, mother-child interaction, maternal depressive symptoms, low- and middle-income countries, early intervention
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Female, Humans, Income, Male, Mother-Child Relations, Poverty, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review