Cited by 8Education during COVID-19 pandemicCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Prevention and Impact

Urban classification, not COVID-19 community rates, was associated with modes of learning in US K-12 schools?

Open access
Goldman, Jennifer L., Schuster, Jennifer E., Maier, Vanessa F., Anand, Rohit, Hill, Elizabeth E., Butteris, Sabrina M., DeMuri, Gregory P., Omidfar, Samantha A. +4 more·2022·PEDIATRICS

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with the decision to provide in-person, hybrid, and remote learning in kindergarten through 12th grade school districts during the 2020-2021 school year. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study evaluating school district mode of learning and community coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) incidence and percentage positivity rates at 3 time points during the pandemic: (1) September 15, 2020 (the beginning of the school year, before Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance); (2) November 15, 2020 (midsemester after the release of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance and an increase of COVID-19 cases); and (3) January 15, 2021 (start of the second semester and peak COVID-19 rates). Five states were included in the analysis: Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, and Wisconsin. The primary outcome was mode of learning in elementary, middle, and high schools during 3 time points. The measures included community COVID-19 incidence and percentage positivity rates, school and student demographics, and county size classification of school location. RESULTS: No relationship between mode of learning and community COVID-19 rates was observed. County urban classification of school location was associated with mode of learning with school districts in nonmetropolitan and small metropolitan counties more likely to be in-person. CONCLUSIONS: Community COVID-19 rates did not appear to influence the decision of when to provide in-person learning. Further understanding of factors driving the decisions to bring children back into the classroom are needed. Standardizing policies on how schools apply national guidance to local decision-making may decrease disparities in emergent crises.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2021-054268m

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [12]12. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services . COVID-19 nursing home data. Available at: https://data.cms.gov/covid-19/covid-19-nursing-home-data. 2021. Accessed August 13, 2021 [PubMed]
  2. [19]19. van den Berg P, Schechter-Perkins EM, Jack RS, et al. Effectiveness of three versus six feet of physical distancing for controlling spread of COVID-19 among primary and secondary students and staff: a retrospective, state-wide cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(10):1871–1878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldman, J. L., Schuster, J. E., Maier, V. F., Anand, R., Hill, E. E., Butteris, S. M., DeMuri, G. P., Omidfar, S. A., Brookhart, M. A., Pak, J., Benjamin, D. K., & Zimmerman, K. O.
Affiliations
  • Children's Mercy Hospital (US)
  • Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine & Public Health
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Departments of Population Health Sciences
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
PEDIATRICS
Published
2022-02-01
Volume
149
Issue
Supplement_2
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W3209206439
Cited by
8
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U24MD016258)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (OT2HD107559, OT2HD107543, OT2HD107556, HHSN275201000003C, OT2HD107558, OT2HD107544, HHSN275201000003I, OT2HD107555, OT2HD107553, OT2HD107557)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, in-person learning, hybrid learning, distance education, K-12 schools, school districts, nonmetropolitan counties, school district policy, CDC guidelines
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Retrospective Studies, United States, Urban Population, Education, Distance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review