Cited by 6Education during COVID-19 pandemicSchool Choice and PerformanceCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

In-Person Instruction and Educational Outcomes of K–8 Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Open access
Uthappa, Diya M., Pak, Joyce, McGann, Kathleen A., Brookhart, M. Alan, McKinzie, Kaylee, Abdelbarr, Mariam, Cockrell, Jed, Hickerson, Jesse +8 more·2023·Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Quantify the relationship between district policy permitting in-person instruction and educational outcomes during the 2020 to 2021 academic year for kindergarten through eighth grade students. METHODS: An ecological, repeated cross-sectional analysis of grade-level proficiency of students enrolled in public school districts in North Carolina (n = 115 school districts) was conducted. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the association between the proportion of the school year a district spent in-person and 2020 to 2021 end-of-year student proficiency in the district. We then fit a multivariable linear regression model, weighted by district size, and adjusted for district-level 2018 to 2019 proficiency and district-level factors (rural or urban, area deprivation). RESULTS: Compared to 2018 to 2019, there was a 12.1% decrease (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.8–19.3) in mathematics and an 18.1% decrease (95% CI: 10.8–13.4) in reading proficiency across the state at the end of 2020 to 2021. Compared to a district that remained entirely remote for the 2020 to 2021 school year, a district offering full in-person instruction had 12% (95% CI: 11%–12.9%) and 4.1% (95% CI: 3.5%–4.8%) more students achieve grade-level proficiency in mathematics and reading, respectively. In-person instruction was associated with greater increases in mathematics proficiency than reading, and greater increases in elementary-level students’ proficiency than middle school–level. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of students achieving grade-level proficiency in 2020 to 2021 fell below prepandemic levels at each evaluated time point in the academic year. Increased time spent in-person by a school district was associated with an increased proportion of students achieving grade-level end-of-grade proficiency in both mathematics and reading.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2022-060352l

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The movement away from in-person instruction during the 2020-2021 school year reduced student achievement, worsened children's mental health, and decreased school enrollment.

    “There is a growing body of literature suggesting that the movement away from in-person instruction during the 2020-2021 school year reduced student achievement,8,10,11,12 worsened children’s mental health,13,14,15,16 and decreased school enrollment.17,18”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uthappa, D. M., Pak, J., McGann, K. A., Brookhart, M. A., McKinzie, K., Abdelbarr, M., Cockrell, J., Hickerson, J., Armstrong, S., D’Agostino, E. M., Weber, D. J., Kalu, I. C., Benjamin, D. K., Zimmerman, K. O., Boutzoukas, A. E., & Collaborative, A. S.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • cDepartment of Pediatrics
  • dDepartment of Population Health Sciences
  • North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics (US)
  • gYadkin County Schools, Yadkinville, North Carolina
  • hDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
  • iDepartment of Family Medicine & Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2023-07-01
Volume
152
Issue
Supplement 1
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W4382919487
Cited by
6
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Pfizer
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Gilead Sciences (COVID-19)
  • Atara Biotherapeutics
  • Melinta Therapeutics
  • Sun Pharma
  • National Institutes of Health (U24TR001608, HHSN275201000003I, COVID-19)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1T32HD094671)
  • Allergan
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (HHSN275201000003C)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN-275201000003I)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (HHSN275201000003I)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U24MD016258)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (OT2HD107559, HHSN275201000003I, T32HD094671)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
face-to-face teaching, COVID-19 pandemic, school closures, student academic outcomes, mathematics proficiency, reading proficiency, K-8 students, school district policy, distance education, North Carolina public schools
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Status, Humans, Schools, Students, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review