Cited by 1,775Psychometric Methodologies and TestingReliability and Agreement in MeasurementMental Health Research Topics

Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures

Raykov, Tenko·1997·Applied Psychological Measurement

Abstract

A structural equation model is described that permits estimation of the reliability index and coefficient of a composite test for congeneric measures. The method is also helpful in exploring the factorial structure of an item set, and its use in scale reliability estimation and development is illustrated. The modeling. estimator of composite reliability it yields does not possess the general underestimation property of Cronbach's coefficient a.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01466216970212006

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raykov, T.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Raykov, Tenko
Venue
Applied Psychological Measurement
Published
1997-06
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
173-184
ISSN
  • 0146-6216 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3497
OpenAlex
W2061288618
Cited by
1,775
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 164 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 143 · 2023: 160 · 2022: 141 · 2021: 152 · 2020: 150 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 129 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 38
FWCI
9.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
composite reliability, structural equation modeling, scale reliability, Cronbach's alpha, factor structure, scale development, reliability estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review