Cited by 240SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Reduced risk of reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 after COVID-19 vaccination—Kentucky, May–June 2021

Open access
Cavanaugh, Alyson M., Spicer, Kevin B., Thoroughman, Douglas, Glick, Connor, Winter, Kathleen·2021·MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Abstract

Although laboratory evidence suggests that antibody responses following COVID-19 vaccination provide better neutralization of some circulating variants than does natural infection (1,2), few real-world epidemiologic studies exist to support the benefit of vaccination for previously infected persons. This report details the findings of a case-control evaluation of the association between vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in Kentucky during May-June 2021 among persons previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 in 2020. Kentucky residents who were not vaccinated had 2.34 times the odds of reinfection compared with those who were fully vaccinated (odds ratio [OR] = 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.58-3.47). These findings suggest that among persons with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, full vaccination provides additional protection against reinfection. To reduce their risk of infection, all eligible persons should be offered vaccination, even if they have been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15585/mmwr.mm7032e1

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Mounib EL, Satchi T. Automating the selection of controls in case-control studies. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2000. https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings/proceedings/sugi25/25/po/25p230.pdf
  2. [6]Wang P, Nair MS, Liu L, Increased resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.351 and B.1.1.7 to antibody neutralization. bioRxiv [Preprint posted online February 4, 2021]. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.25.428137v2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cavanaugh, A. M., Spicer, K. B., Thoroughman, D., Glick, C., & Winter, K.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Cavanaugh, Alyson M.
Venue
MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Published
2021-08-13
Volume
70
Issue
32
Pages
1081-1083
ISSN
  • 0149-2195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-861X
OpenAlex
W3192403639
Cited by
240
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 34
FWCI
18.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department for Public Health, Cabinet for Health and Family Services
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 vaccination, reinfection, vaccine effectiveness, antibody response, natural infection
MeSH terms
Reinfection, COVID-19, COVID-19 Vaccines, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Kentucky, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review