Cited by 364SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchImmune responses and vaccinationsCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Binding and Neutralization Antibody Titers After a Single Vaccine Dose in Health Care Workers Previously Infected With SARS-CoV-2

Open access
Saadat, Saman, Rikhtegaran Tehrani, Zahra, Logue, James, Newman, Michelle, Frieman, Matthew B., Harris, Anthony D., Sajadi, Mohammad M.·2021·JAMA

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Current shortages in COVID-19 vaccine production and distribution have led some experts to suggest untested regimens.1 Persons who have had COVID-19 are thought to have protective immunity and memory responses 2 for at least 6 months; however, neither recall responses nor ideal vaccine dosing regimens have been studied in those previously infected with SARS-CoV-2.We assessed whether health care workers with previous COVID-19 infection could mount recall responses to a single dose of an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine.Methods | Health care workers who had previously enrolled in a hospital-wide serosurvey study, 3 conducted from July to August 2020 at the University of Maryland Medical Center, were randomly contacted based on stratification into 3 groups: SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody-negative (Ab-negative); IgG-positive asymptomatic COVID-19 (asymptomatic); and IgG-positive with history of symptomatic COVID-19 (symptomatic).Participants were vaccinated with either the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccine, depending on personal preference and availability.Blood was drawn at days 0 (baseline), 7, and 14 postvaccination in December 2020 and January 2021 (draws could be within 1 day from assigned day).Plasma was tested using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for IgG to spike trimer, which was modified from an assay 4 to give a readout of half-

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2021.3341

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vaccination increased plasma RBD antibody levels in convalescent individuals, with IgG titres increasing by nearly 30-fold compared with unvaccinated individuals.

    “Consistent with previous reports5–8, vaccination increased the plasma RBD antibody levels, with IgG titres increasing by nearly 30-fold compared with unvaccinated individuals (Fig. 1a, right).”
  • Estimates based on serological data from blood donors suggest substantial geographic variability in detection rates, which may contribute to observed differences in reinfection patterns by province.

    “Estimates based on serological data from blood donors suggest substantial geographic variability in detection rates ( 22 ), which may contribute to the observed differences in reinfection patterns by province (fig. S1).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saadat, S., Rikhtegaran Tehrani, Z., Logue, J., Newman, M., Frieman, M. B., Harris, A. D., & Sajadi, M. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore
Corresponding author
Sajadi, Mohammad M.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2021-04-13
Volume
325
Issue
14
Pages
1467
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W3134757598
Cited by
364
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 127 · 2021: 184
FWCI
28.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U01CK000556)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI147870)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 vaccines, mRNA vaccines, prior COVID-19 infection, single-dose vaccination, healthcare workers, neutralizing antibodies, asymptomatic infection, symptomatic infection, BNT162b2, Moderna vaccine, seroconversion
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, mRNA Vaccines, Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Viral, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Male, Middle Aged, Vaccines, Synthetic, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Asymptomatic Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review