Cited by 319Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseInjury Epidemiology and Prevention

Suicide Trends Among and Within Urbanization Levels by Sex, Race/Ethnicity, Age Group, and Mechanism of Death—United States, 2001–2015

Open access
Ivey-Stephenson, Asha Z., Crosby, Alex E., Jack, Shane P. D., Haileyesus, Tadesse, Kresnow-Sedacca, Marcie-jo·2017·MMWR. Surveillance Summaries

Abstract

PROBLEM/CONDITION: Suicide is a public health problem and one of the top 10 leading causes of death in the United States. Substantial geographic variations in suicide rates exist, with suicides in rural areas occurring at much higher rates than those occurring in more urban areas. Understanding demographic trends and mechanisms of death among and within urbanization levels is important to developing and targeting future prevention efforts. REPORTING PERIOD: 2001-2015. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM: Mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) include demographic, geographic, and cause of death information derived from death certificates filed in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. NVSS was used to identify suicide deaths, defined by International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) underlying cause of death codes X60-X84, Y87.0, and U03. This report examines annual county level trends in suicide rates during 2001-2015 among and within urbanization levels by select demographics and mechanisms of death. Counties were collapsed into three urbanization levels using the 2006 National Center for Health Statistics classification scheme. RESULTS: Suicide rates increased across the three urbanization levels, with higher rates in nonmetropolitan/rural counties than in medium/small or large metropolitan counties. Each urbanization level experienced substantial annual rate changes at different times during the study period. Across urbanization levels, suicide rates were consistently highest for men and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Natives compared with rates for women and other racial/ethnic groups; however, rates were highest for non-Hispanic whites in more metropolitan counties. Trends indicate that suicide rates for non-Hispanic blacks were lowest in nonmetropolitan/rural counties and highest in more urban counties. Increases in suicide rates occurred for all age groups across urbanization levels, with the highest rates for persons aged 35-64 years. For mechanism of death, greater increases in rates of suicide by firearms and hanging/suffocation occurred across all urbanization levels; rates of suicide by firearms in nonmetropolitan/rural counties were almost two times that of rates in larger metropolitan counties. INTERPRETATION: Suicide rates in nonmetropolitan/rural counties are consistently higher than suicide rates in metropolitan counties. These trends also are observed by sex, race/ethnicity, age group, and mechanism of death. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION: Interventions to prevent suicides should be ongoing, particularly in rural areas. Comprehensive suicide prevention efforts might include leveraging protective factors and providing innovative prevention strategies that increase access to health care and mental health care in rural communities. In addition, distribution of socioeconomic factors varies in different communities and needs to be better understood in the context of suicide prevention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15585/mmwr.ss6618a1

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The WHO highlights that harmful use of alcohol and substance use disorders contribute to suicide ideation in all age groups.

    “However, the WHO highlights that some risk factors, such as harmful use of alcohol and substance use disorders, contribute to suicide ideation in all age groups [14,53].”

    From Toxicological Findings of Self-Poisoning Suicidal Deaths: A Systematic Review by Countries (2022) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Introduction discusses influences on suicide, and the Discussion mentions drug overdoses and alcohol-related mortality alongside suicides. Neither passage says that harmful alcohol use or substance use disorders contribute to suicidal ideation in all age groups, or attributes that claim to the WHO. Searches for those risk factors and suicidal ideation found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The young age of victims correlates with their vulnerability and impulsiveness and their easy access to toxic drugs.

    “The young age of the victims correlates with their vulnerability and impulsiveness and their easy access to toxic drugs [52,53].”

    From Toxicological Findings of Self-Poisoning Suicidal Deaths: A Systematic Review by Countries (2022) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Results and Discussion (pages not provided) report suicide rates by age and mechanism, including drug poisoning, but do not link young age to vulnerability, impulsiveness, or access to toxic drugs. Searches for those proposed links found no passage addressing them. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ivey-Stephenson, A. Z., Crosby, A. E., Jack, S. P. D., Haileyesus, T., & Kresnow-Sedacca, M.-J.
Affiliations
  • National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (US)
  • Division of Analysis, Research, and Practice Integration, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC
Corresponding author
Ivey-Stephenson, Asha Z.
Venue
MMWR. Surveillance Summaries
Published
2017-10-06
Volume
66
Issue
18
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 1545-8636 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-0738
OpenAlex
W2762275952
Cited by
319
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 1
FWCI
31.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • MMWR Surveillance Summaries (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Keywords
suicide, suicide rates, urbanization level, urban-rural differences, sex differences, racial and ethnic disparities, age groups, mechanism of death, firearm suicide, suicide prevention, non-Hispanic blacks, non-Hispanic whites
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cause of Death, Child, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Suicide, United States, Urbanization, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Racial Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review