Cited by 74Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsSoft Robotics and Applications

VisuoSpatial Foresight for Multi-Step, Multi-Task Fabric Manipulation

Open access
Hoque, Ryan, Seita, Daniel, Balakrishna, Ashwin, Ganapathi, Aditya, Tanwani, Ajay, Jamali, Nawid, Yamane, Katsu, Iba, Soshi +1 more·2020·Robotics: Science and Systems XVI

Abstract

Robotic fabric manipulation has applications in home robotics, textiles, senior care and surgery.Existing fabric manipulation techniques, however, are designed for specific tasks, making it difficult to generalize across different but related tasks.We extend the Visual Foresight framework to learn fabric dynamics that can be efficiently reused to accomplish different fabric manipulation tasks with a single goal-conditioned policy.We introduce VisuoSpatial Foresight (VSF), which builds on prior work by learning visual dynamics on domain randomized RGB images and depth maps simultaneously and completely in simulation.We experimentally evaluate VSF on multi-step fabric smoothing and folding tasks against 5 baseline methods in simulation and on the da Vinci Research Kit (dVRK) surgical robot without any demonstrations at train or test time.Furthermore, we find that leveraging depth significantly improves performance.RGBD data yields an 80% improvement in fabric folding success rate over pure RGB data.Code, data, videos, and supplementary material are available at https://sites.google.com/view/fabric-vsf/.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15607/rss.2020.xvi.034

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Training an approximated dynamic model using supervised learning with transitions induced by a base policy generally does not work well in practice, especially in high-dimensional settings, mainly due to the distributional shift problem.

    “This approach generally does not work well in practice, especially in high-dimensional settings [37,38], mainly due to the distributional shift problem, i.e., ρπP^(st)≠ρπbase(st)[8]”

    From Data-Driven Robotic Manipulation of Cloth-like Deformable Objects: The Present, Challenges and Future Prospects (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    Section IV-C (Data Generation; page unavailable) says the dynamics model was trained on transitions from a random policy, and Section IV-E (VisuoSpatial Foresight; page unavailable) says MPC mitigates compounding model error. Neither passage addresses the distributional shift between a base policy’s state distribution and the learned model’s policy distribution. A search for “distributional shift” and base-policy distribution mismatch found no passage stating the cited point. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dian Chen, Brady Zhou, Vladlen Koltun, and Philipp Krahen- buhl. Learning by Cheating. In Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2019.
  2. Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. Deep Learning. MIT Press, 2016. http://www.deeplearningbook.org.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoque, R., Seita, D., Balakrishna, A., Ganapathi, A., Tanwani, A., Jamali, N., Yamane, K., Iba, S., & Goldberg, K.
Venue
Robotics: Science and Systems XVI
Published
2020-07-12
OpenAlex
W3039258510
Cited by
74
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 4
FWCI
21.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Robotics: Science and Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1734633)
  • Cisco Systems
  • Nvidia
  • Intuitive Surgical
  • National Physical Science Consortium
  • Toyota Research Institute
  • Amazon Robotics
  • Honda Research Institute, USA
  • Samsung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
Keywords
fabric manipulation, goal-conditioned policies, domain randomization, depth images, surgical robots, da Vinci Research Kit, fabric folding, sim-to-real transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review