Cited by 227Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Deep Learning in Protein Structural Modeling and Design

Open access
Gao, Wenhao, Mahajan, Sai Pooja, Sulam, Jeremias, Gray, Jeffrey J.·2020·Patterns

Abstract

function" paradigm. This review is directed to help both computational biologists to gain familiarity with the deep learning methods applied in protein modeling, and computer scientists to gain perspective on the biologically meaningful problems that may benefit from deep learning techniques.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patter.2020.100142

Cites

273 of 273 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep learning has already been exploited in structural modeling and design, analysis, and linking these to function.

    “Deep learning has also been already exploited in structural modeling and design60,194−196 and analysis191 and linking these to function.197”

    From AlphaFold, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Allostery (2022) · cites this paper as [60]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [56]Bahdanau, D.; Cho, K.H.; Bengio, Y. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015—Conference Track Proceedings. 2015.
  2. [66]Arjovsky M. Chintala S. Bottou L. Wasserstein G.A.N. arXiv 1701 2017 07875
  3. [67]Kurach K. Lučić M. Zhai X. Michalski M. Gelly S. A large-scale study on regularization and normalization in GANs Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. 2019 3581 3590
  4. [69]Niepert M. Ahmed M. Kutzkov K. Learning convolutional neural networks for graphs Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. 2016 2014 2023
  5. [139]Wang W. Gómez-Bombarelli R. Learning coarse-grained particle latent space with auto-encoders Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 1 2019
  6. [170]Du Y. Meier J. Ma J. Fergus R. Rives A. Energy-based models for atomic-resolution protein conformations arXiv 2004 2020 13167
  7. [187]Riesselman A.J. Shin J.-E. Kollasch A.W. McMahon C. Simon E. Sander C. Manglik A. Kruse A.C. Marks D.S. Accelerating protein design using autoregressive generative models bioRxiv 2019 757252 PMC8065141 33893299
  8. [210]Karimi M. Zhu S. Cao Y. Shen Y. De novo protein design for novel folds using guided conditional Wasserstein generative adversarial networks J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2020 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00593 PMC7775287 32945673 · DOI
  9. [231]You J. Liu B. Ying R. Pande V. Leskovec J. Graph convolutional policy network for goal-directed molecular graph generation Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2018 6410 6421

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, W., Mahajan, S. P., Sulam, J., & Gray, J. J.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Gray, Jeffrey J.
Venue
Patterns
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
1
Issue
9
Pages
100142
ISSN
2666-3899 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3100159300
Cited by
227
References
273
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patterns (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01-GM078221)
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
deep learning, protein structure modeling, protein design, protein structure prediction, protein function prediction, computational biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review