CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 600

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and cardiovascular diseases: a review

Bhat, Tariq, Teli, Sumaya, Rijal, Jharendra, Bhat, Hilal, Raza, Muhammad, Khoueiry, Georges, Meghani, Mustafain, Akhtar, Muhammad, Costantino, Thomas·2013·Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
DOI 10.1586/erc.12.159
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The role of inflammatory markers in cardiovascular diseases has been studied extensively and a consistent relationship between various inflammatory markers and cardiovascular diseases has been established in the past. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a new addition to the long list of these inflammatory markers. NLR, which is calculated from complete blood count with differential, is an inexpensive, easy to obtain, widely available marker of inflammation, which can aid in the risk stratification of patients with various cardiovascular diseases in addition to the traditionally used markers. It has been associated with arterial stiffness and high coronary calcium score, which are themselves significant markers of cardiovascular disease. NLR is reported as an independent predictor of outcome in stable coronary artery disease, as well as a predictor of short- and long-term mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. It is linked with increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and higher long-term mortality in patients undergoing PCI irrespective of indications of PCI. In patients admitted with advanced heart failure, high NLR was reported with higher inpatient mortality. Recently, NLR has been reported as a prognostic marker for outcome from coronary artery bypass grafting and postcoronary artery bypass grafting atrial fibrillation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1586/erc.12.159

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Ates, 2011, Cardiol. J., 18, 371, 10.5603/CJ.2011.0045 · DOI
  2. Buckley, 2009, Ann. Intern. Med., 151, 483, 10.7326/0003-4819-151-7-200910060-00009 · DOI
  3. Danesh, 1998, JAMA, 279, 1477, 10.1001/jama.279.18.1477 · DOI
  4. Ensrud, 1992, Am. Heart J., 124, 207, 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90942-O · DOI
  5. Lee, 2001, Am. J. Epidemiol., 154, 758, 10.1093/aje/154.8.758 · DOI
  6. Guasti, 2011, Thromb. Haemost., 106, 591, 10.1160/TH11-02-0096 · DOI
  7. Pearson, 2003, Circulation, 107, 499, 10.1161/01.CIR.0000052939.59093.45 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Olivares, 1993, Am. J. Epidemiol., 137, 49, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116601 · DOI
  9. Horne, 2005, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 45, 1638, 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.054 · DOI
  10. Papa, 2008, Clin. Chim. Acta, 395, 27, 10.1016/j.cca.2008.04.019 · DOI
  11. Kalay, 2012, Angiology, 63, 213, 10.1177/0003319711412763 · DOI
  12. Park, 2011, Clin. Chim. Acta, 412, 925, 10.1016/j.cca.2011.01.021 · DOI
  13. Tsai, 2007, Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev., 23, 111, 10.1002/dmrr.647 · DOI
  14. McCaig, 2001, Adv. Data, 320, 1
  15. Takakuwa, 2008, Radiology, 248, 438, 10.1148/radiol.2482072169 · DOI
  16. Romagnoli, 2010, Radiol. Med., 115, 341, 10.1007/s11547-009-0482-7 · DOI
  17. Mingels, 2012, PLoS ONE, 7, e35059, 10.1371/journal.pone.0035059 · DOI
  18. Zazula, 2008, Arq. Bras. Cardiol., 90, 31, 10.1590/S0066-782X2008000100006 · DOI
  19. Li, 2009, Chin. Med. J., 122, 1738
  20. Muhmmed Suliman, 2010, Arch. Med. Res., 41, 618, 10.1016/j.arcmed.2010.11.006 · DOI
  21. Tamhane, 2008, Am. J. Cardiol., 102, 653, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.05.006 · DOI
  22. Duffy, 2006, Am. J. Cardiol., 97, 993, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.10.034 · DOI
  23. Poludasu, 2009, Clin. Cardiol., 32, E6, 10.1002/clc.20503 · DOI
  24. Núñez, 2008, Am. J. Cardiol., 101, 747, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.11.004 · DOI
  25. Cho, 2011, Am. J. Cardiol., 107, 849, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.10.067 · DOI
  26. Kruk, 2008, Circ. J., 72, 205, 10.1253/circj.72.205 · DOI
  27. Blangy, 2007, Europace, 9, 724, 10.1093/europace/eum102 · DOI
  28. Konstantino, 2007, Clin. Cardiol., 30, 408, 10.1002/clc.20110 · DOI
  29. 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00145.x · DOI
  30. Wu, 2012, Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging, 5, 178, 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.968024 · DOI
  31. Chatterjee, 2011, Cardiovasc. Hematol. Disord. Drug Targets, 11, 58, 10.2174/187152911798346981 · DOI
  32. Cooper, 1999, Am. J. Cardiol., 84, 252, 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00272-6 · DOI
  33. Engström, 2009, Circ. Heart Fail., 2, 217, 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.827071 · DOI
  34. Arruda-Olson, 2009, Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes, 2, 656, 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.831024 · DOI
  35. Kyne, 2000, Am. Heart J., 139, 94, 10.1016/S0002-8703(00)90314-4 · DOI
  36. Rudiger, 2006, Am. J. Emerg. Med., 24, 451, 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.10.010 · DOI
  37. Uthamalingam, 2011, Am. J. Cardiol., 107, 433, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.09.039 · DOI
  38. Gibson, 2007, Am. Heart J., 154, 995, 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.06.043 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Gibson, 2010, Am. J. Cardiol., 105, 186, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.09.007 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bhat, T., Teli, S., Rijal, J., Bhat, H., Raza, M., Khoueiry, G., Meghani, M., Akhtar, M., & Costantino, T.
Venue
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
55-59
ISSN
  • 1477-9072
  • 1744-8344
DOI
10.1586/erc.12.159
Cited by
600
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review