The DOI matches its Crossref record; 234 of the 234 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized clinical trials of dental bleaching – Compliance with the CONSORT Statement: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
We reviewed the literature to evaluate: a) The compliance of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on bleaching with the CONSORT; and b) the risk of bias of these studies using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool (CCRT). We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed and other electronic databases, to find RCTs focused on bleaching (or whitening). The articles were evaluated in compliance with CONSORT in a scale: 0 = no description, 1 = poor description and 2 = adequate description. Descriptive analyses of the number of studies by journal, follow-up period, country and quality assessments were performed with CCRT for assessing risk of bias in RCTs. 185 RCTs were included for assessment. More than 30% of the studies received score 0 or 1. Protocol, flow chart, allocation concealment and sample size were more critical items, as 80% of the studies scored 0. The overall CONSORT score for the included studies was 16.7 ± 5.4 points, which represents 52.2% of the maximum CONSORT score. A significant difference among journal, country and period of time was observed (p < 0.02). Only 7.6% of the studies were judged at "low" risk; 62.1% were classified as "unclear"; and 30.3% as "high" risk of bias. The adherence of RCTs evaluating bleaching materials and techniques to the CONSORT is still low with unclear/high risk of bias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The evaluation of compliance with the CONSORT statement was performed using a previously validated tool that has been applied in other studies (Loguercio et al. 2017; Reis et al. 2018).”
From Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on dentin hypersensitivity treatment using mouthwashes (2025) · cites this paper as Loguercio et al. 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Some published studies have, however, shown lower adherence to the CONSORT guidelines (Loguercio et al. 2017; Menne et al. 2022; Knippschild et al. 2021; Rezende et al. 2022; Flint and Harrison 2010).”
From Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on dentin hypersensitivity treatment using mouthwashes (2025) · cites this paper as Loguercio et al. 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These variations may be due to methodological choices made by authors when analyzing CONSORT adherence, such as the criteria used for selecting RCTs, the method of conformity assessment, or the publication period (Loguercio et al. 2017).”
From Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on dentin hypersensitivity treatment using mouthwashes (2025) · cites this paper as Loguercio et al. 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovic, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., Sterne, J. A. C., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928 · Cited by 33,817
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-18 · Cited by 13,371
Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K. F., Montori, V., Gotzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., Elbourne, D., Egger, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c869 · Cited by 8,883
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Higgins, J. P. T., Green, S., & Ben Van Den, A. (2020) · International Coaching Psychology Review · doi:10.53841/bpsicpr.2020.15.2.123 · Cited by 5,670
Schulz (1995) · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520290060030 · Cited by 5,634
Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
Jüni, P., Altman, D. G., & Egger, M. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42 · Cited by 3,309
GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Schünemann, H. J., Tugwell, P., & Knottnerus, A. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011 · Cited by 3,094
The Levels of Evidence and Their Role in Evidence-Based Medicine
Burns, P. B., Rohrich, R. J., & Chung, K. C. (2011) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e318219c171 · Cited by 2,155
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-32 · Cited by 1,871
Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K. F., Montori, V., Gøtzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., Elbourne, D., Egger, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004 · Cited by 1,858
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Gomes RS, 2008, Avaliação clínica da eficiência do uso do sistema LED-laser, LED e luz halógena na ativação do agente clareador em dentes vitalizados, Rev Dental Press Estét, 5, 62
- Reis A, 2017, Compliance of randomized clinical trials in non-carious cervical lesions with the CONSORT Statement: a methodology systematic review, Oper Dent
- Geus JL, 2015, Effectiveness of and tooth sensitivity with at-home bleaching in smokers: a multicenter clinical trial, J Am Dent Assoc, 146, 233, 10.1016/j.adaj.2014.12.014 · DOI
- Fernández E, 2015, Efficacy and tooth sensitivity of at-home bleaching in smokers: a two-center clinical trial, J Am Dent Assoc, 146
- Gallo JR, 2009, Evaluation of 30% carbamide peroxide at-home bleaching gels with and without potassium nitrate: a pilot study, Quintessence Int, 40, e1
- Garcia-Godoy F, 2004, Placebo-controlled, 6-week clinical trial on the safety and efficacy of a low-gel, 14% hydrogen-peroxide whitening strip, Compend Contin Educ Dent, 25, 21
- Gerlach R, 2000, A randomized clinical trial comparing a novel 5.3 percent hydrogen peroxide whitening strip to 10 percent, 15 percent, and 20 percent carbamide peroxide tray-based bleaching systems, Compend Contin Educ Dent, 29, S22
- Gerlach RW, 2004, Clinical trial comparing two daytime hydrogen-peroxide professional vital-bleaching systems, Compend Contin Educ Dent, 25, 33
- Posso Moreno SL, 2010, Comparación del blanqueamiento dental con peróxido de hidrógeno al 25 percent en consultorio, utilizando o no activación con lámpara de luz halógena, Univ Odontol, 29, 19
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Veloso, S., Lemos, C., de Moraes, S. D., Vasconcelos, B. C. D. E., Pellizzer, E., & Monteiro, G. Q. D. M. (2018) · Clinical Oral Investigations · doi:10.1007/s00784-018-2429-7 · Cited by 193
In-office dental bleaching with light vs. without light: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Maran, B. M., Burey, A., de Paris Matos, T., Loguercio, A. D., & Reis, A. (2018) · Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.11.007 · Cited by 137
Self-citationCONSORT endorsement improves the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials in dentistry
Sarkis-Onofre, R., Poletto-Neto, V., Cenci, M. S., Moher, D., & Pereira-Cenci, T. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.020 · Cited by 59
Widbiller, M., Knüttel, H., Meschi, N., & Durán‐Sindreu, F. (2022) · International Endodontic Journal · doi:10.1111/iej.13784 · Cited by 40
Cardenas, A. F. M., Maran, B. M., Araújo, L. C. R., Siqueira, F., Wambier, L. M., Gonzaga, C. C., Loguércio, A. D., & Reis, A. (2019) · Clinical Oral Investigations · doi:10.1007/s00784-019-03042-4 · Cited by 39
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- LOGUERCIO, A. D., MARAN, B. M., HANZEN, T. A., PAULA, A. M. D., PERDIGÃO, J., & REIS, A.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Brazil
- Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (BR)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Brazilian Oral Research
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2017-08-28
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- suppl 1
- Pages
- e60-e60
- ISSN
- 1517-7491 (ISSN-L)
- 1806-8324
- OpenAlex
- W2749572431
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 234
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Brazilian Oral Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (304104/2013-9, 305,588/2014-1, 2013-9, 2014-1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Erosion and Treatment
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Keywords
- tooth bleaching, CONSORT statement, reporting quality, risk of bias, allocation concealment, protocol registration, flowcharts, sample size, randomized controlled trials
- MeSH terms
- Dental Bonding, Humans, Research Design, Risk Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Publication Bias, Risk Assessment, Guideline Adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
