Cited by 24Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Education and ValidationPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Portuguese version of the quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction questionnaire: a validation study

Open access
Zubaran, Carlos, Foresti, Katia, Thorell, Mariana Rossi, Franceschini, Paulo Roberto, Homero, Wagner·2009·Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) among substance users in southern Brazil. METHODS: The original English version of the Q-LES-Q was translated into Portuguese taking into account semantic and conceptual equivalence. The Portuguese versions of the Q-LES-Q and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF) were used to assess quality of life among crack cocaine and inhalant users. Factorial and reliability analyses as well as correlation studies were conducted to establish the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Q-LES-Q. RESULTS: All areas of the Q-LES-Q achieved significant Cronbach's coefficients. Significant Pearson correlation coefficients were obtained between various subscales of the Q-LES-Q and the four dimensions of the WHOQOL-BREF. Correlations were significant when crack and inhalant users were analyzed separately or conjointly. Inhalant users presented significantly higher scores than crack users in the social (p=0.035) and general (p=0.005) subscales of the Q-LES-Q. CONCLUSION: The Portuguese version of the Q-LES-Q possesses sound internal validity. The English version of the Q-LES-Q was adequately adapted to Portuguese. Inhalant users may present lower levels of satisfaction with social life and overall quality of life than crack users. The Portuguese version of the Q-LES-Q is a reliable questionnaire for future research and clinical use with substance users in Brazil.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s1020-49892009000500010

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Q-LES-Q-SF was translated and validated for Portuguese (Cronbach's alpha = 0.78).

    “The Q-LES-Q-SF includes 16 items and has been translated and validated (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.78) into Portuguese.44”

    From Improved quality of life and reduced depressive symptoms in medical students after a single-session intervention (2020) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Quality-of-life assessment section describes the short form as 14 general-activities items plus two additional items, and the Discussion supports its Portuguese adaptation and validation. But Table 2 reports Cronbach’s alpha of 0.84 for general activities, the short form—not 0.78. The 0.78 value belongs to the work subscale. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. The WHOQOL Group. The development of the World Health Organisation quality of life assessment instrument: The WHOQOL. In: Orley J and Kuyken W, eds. Quality of life as- sessment: international perspectives. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Telos; 1994. Pp. 41-60.
  2. Barros MB. The use of the concept of social class in the epidemiological profiles studies: a proposal. Rev Saude Publica. 1986;20(4): 269-73.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zubaran, C., Foresti, K., Thorell, M. R., Franceschini, P. R., & Homero, W.
Affiliations
  • Santa Casa Hospital (BR)
  • Universidade de Caxias do Sul (BR)
Venue
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
Published
2009-05
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
443-8
ISSN
1020-4989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140285242
Cited by
24
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Q-LES-Q, Portuguese translation, psychometric validation, quality of life, substance users, crack cocaine users, WHOQOL-BREF, cross-cultural adaptation, internal validity, reliability statistics
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brazil, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review