The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of energy and macronutrient intake in young men: a comparison of 4-day food record and 24-hour dietary recall
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the quantitative agreement between a 4-day food record and a 24-hour dietary recall in young men. METHODS: Thirty-four healthy men aged 18-25 years had their food intake estimated by 4-day food record within one week following 24-hour dietary recall in a cross-sectional study. Resting metabolic rate was assessed by indirect calorimetry and Energy Expenditure was estimated by physical activity records completed simultaneously with food intake records. The validity of food records was determined by direct comparison of Energy Intake and Energy Expenditure (95% confidence interval for Energy Intake/Energy Expenditure). RESULTS: There were good agreements between the measurements of energy and macronutrient intakes by 24-hour dietary recall and 4-day food record at the group level, but not at the individual level. Compared to energy expenditure, about 20% and 9% of participants underreported their Energy Intake by 4-day food record and 24-hour dietary recall, respectively. Over 30% of underreporters of Energy Intake estimated by 24-hour dietary recall underreported Energy Intake estimated by 4-day food record. CONCLUSION: Both diet methods, 24-hour dietary recall and 4-day food record, may be used to collect data at the group level, but not at the individual level. Both methods, however, appear to underestimate Energy Intake. Underreporting may be subject-specific and appears that is more difficult to retrieve valid dietary data from some people than others.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Single 24 h recalls are comparable to 3- or 4-day food records for mean intakes of energy and macronutrients (i.e., at the group level) [31,32], but not when assessed by Bland–Altman plots (i.e., at the individual level) [32].”
From Dietary Intake of Athletes at the World Masters Athletics Championships as Assessed by Single 24 h Recall (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
BLACK, A. E., & COLE, T. J. (2001) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(01)00018-9 · Cited by 249
Høidrup, S., Andreasen, A., Osler, M., Pedersen, A., Jørgensen, L., Jørgensen, T., Schroll, M., & Heitmann, B. (2002) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601292 · Cited by 68
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Briefel RR, 1997, Dietary methods research in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: underreporting of energy intake, Am J Clin Nutr, 65, 1203S, 10.1093/ajcn/65.4.1203S · DOI · Paper page
- Biro G, 2002, Selection of methodology to assess food intake, Eur J Clin Nutr, 56, S25, 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601426 · DOI · Paper page
- Edington J, 1989, Assessment of nutritional intake using dietary records with estimated weight, J Hum Nutr Diet, 2, 407, 10.1111/j.1365-277X.1989.tb00045.x · DOI
- Kortzinger I, 1997, Dietary underreporting: validity of dietary measurements of energy intake using a 7-day dietary record and a diet history in non-obese subjects, Ann Nutr Metab, 41, 37, 10.1159/000177976 · DOI
- Howat PM, 1994, Validity and reliability of reported dietary intake data, J Am Diet Assoc, 94, 169, 10.1016/0002-8223(94)90242-9 · DOI
- Weir JB, 1949, New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism, J Physiol, 109, 1, 10.1113/jphysiol.1949.sp004363 · DOI · Paper page
- Bouchard C, 1983, A method to assess energy expenditure in children and adults, Am J Clin Nutr, 37, 461, 10.1093/ajcn/37.3.461 · DOI · Paper page
- Black AE, 2000, The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cut-off for EI: BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity, Eur J Clin Nutr, 54, 395, 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600971 · DOI · Paper page
- Black AE, 2000, Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake: basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 24, 1119, 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801376 · DOI · Paper page
- Conway JM, 2004, Accuracy of dietary recall using the USDA five-step multiplepass method in men: an observational validation study, J Am Diet Assoc, 104, 595, 10.1016/j.jada.2004.01.007 · DOI · Paper page
- Ard JD, 2006, Dietary restraint and disinhibition do not affect accuracy of 24-hour recall in a multiethnic population, J Am Diet Assoc, 106, 434, 10.1016/j.jada.2005.12.006 · DOI
- Karvetti RL, 1985, Validity of the 24-hour dietary recall, J Am Diet Assoc, 85, 1437, 10.1016/S0002-8223(21)03818-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Jonnalagadda SS, 2000, Accuracy of energy intake data estimated by a multiple-pass, 24-hour dietary recall technique, J Am Diet Assoc, 100, 303, 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00095-X · DOI · Paper page
- Poppitt SD, 1998, Assessment of selective under-reporting of food intake by both obese and non-obese women in a metabolic facility, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 22, 303, 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800584 · DOI · Paper page
- Ainslie PN, 2003, Estimating human energy expenditure: a review of techniques with particular reference to doubly labelled water, Sports Med, 33, 683, 10.2165/00007256-200333090-00004 · DOI · Paper page
- Black AE, 1996, Human energy expenditure in affluent societies: an analysis of 574 doubly-labelled water measurements, Eur J Clin Nutr, 50, 72
- Livingstone MB, 1992, Validation of estimates of energy intake by weighed dietary record and diet history in children and adolescents, Am J Clin Nutr, 56, 29, 10.1093/ajcn/56.1.29 · DOI · Paper page
- Champagne CM, 2002, Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians, J Am Diet Assoc, 102, 1428, 10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90316-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Black AE, 1986, Use of food quotients to predict respiratory quotients for the doubly-labelled water method of measuring energy expenditure, Hum Nutr Clin Nutr, 40, 381
- Bingham SA, 1987, The dietary assessment of individualsç methods, accuracy, new techniques and recommendations, Nutr Abstr Rev, 57, 705
- Nelson M, 1989, Betweenand within-subject variation in nutrient intake from infancy to old age: estimating the number of days required to rank dietary intakes with desired precision, Am J Clin Nutr, 50, 155, 10.1093/ajcn/50.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
- McKenzie DC, 2002, Impact of interviewer's body mass index on underreporting energy intake in overweight and obese women, Obes Res, 10, 471, 10.1038/oby.2002.65 · DOI
- Hebert JR, 2002, Systematic Errors in Middle-Aged Women's Estimates of Energy Intake: comparing three self-report measures to total energy expenditure from doubly labeled water, Ann Epidemiol, 12, 577, 10.1016/S1047-2797(01)00297-6 · DOI
- Asbeck I, 2002, Severe underreporting of energy intake in normal weight subjects: use of an appropriate standard and relation to restrained eating, Public Health Nutr, 5, 683, 10.1079/PHN2002337 · DOI
- Black AE, 1993, Measurements of total energy expenditure provide insights into the validity of dietary measurements of energy intake, J Am Diet Assoc, 93, 572, 10.1016/0002-8223(93)91820-G · DOI · Paper page
- MacDiarmid JI, 1997, Dietary under-reporting: what people say about recording their food intake, Eur J Clin Nutr, 51, 199, 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600380 · DOI
- Vuckovic N, 2000, A qualitative study of participants' experiences with dietary assessment, J Am Diet Assoc, 100, 1023, 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00301-1 · DOI
Cited by
Leonhardt, T. P. M., Bristol, A., McLaurin, N., Forbes, S. C., Tanaka, H., Frings-Meuthen, P., Pesta, D., Rittweger, J., & Chilibeck, P. D. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16040564 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Liberato, S. C., Bressan, J., & Hills, A. P.
- Affiliations
- Menzies School of Health Research, Australia; Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Brazil
- Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Brazil
- Queensland University of Technology, Australia
- Venue
- Revista de Nutrição
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 621-630
- ISSN
- 1415-5273
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
