The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cut-off for EI:BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Markers of the Validity of Reported Energy Intake
Livingstone, M. B. E., & Black, A. E. (2003) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/133.3.895s · Cited by 1,081
Self-citationMeasurement of dietary intake in children
Livingstone, M. B. E., & Robson, P. J. (2000) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1017/s0029665100000318 · Cited by 750
Nutrient adequacy and dietary diversity in rural Mali: association and determinants
Torheim, L. E., Ouattara, F., Diarra, M. M., Thiam, F. D., Barikmo, I., Hatløy, A., & Oshaug, A. (2004) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601853 · Cited by 359
Rutishauser, I. H. (2005) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2005798 · Cited by 307
BLACK, A. E., & COLE, T. J. (2001) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(01)00018-9 · Cited by 249
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Black, A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 395-404
- ISSN
- 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5640
- OpenAlex
- W2051529690
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cut-off for EI:BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600971
- The paper
- Black, A. (2000). The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cut-off for EI:BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600971
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
