Cited by 19Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and applicability of the Brazilian version of the frontotemporal dementia rating scale (FTD-FRS)

Open access
Lima-Silva, Thais Bento, Bahia, Valéria Santoro, Carvalho, Viviane Amaral, Guimarães, Henrique Cerqueira, Caramelli, Paulo, Balthazar, Márcio, Damasceno, Benito, Bottino, Cássio Machado de Campos +4 more·2013·Dementia & Neuropsychologia

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Staging scales for dementia have been devised for grading Alzheimer's disease (AD) but do not include the specific symptoms of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). OBJECTIVE: To translate and adapt the Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS) to Brazilian Portuguese. METHODS: The cross-cultural adaptation process consisted of the following steps: translation, back-translation (prepared by independent translators), discussion with specialists, and development of a final version after minor adjustments. A pilot application was carried out with 12 patients diagnosed with bvFTD and 11 with AD, matched for disease severity (CDR=1.0). The evaluation protocol included: Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Executive Interview (EXIT-25), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS) and Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR). RESULTS: The Brazilian version of the FTD-FRS seemed appropriate for use in this country. Preliminary results revealed greater levels of disability in bvFTD than in AD patients (bvFTD: 25% mild, 50% moderate and 25% severe; AD: 36.36% mild, 63.64% moderate). It appears that the CDR underrates disease severity in bvFTD since a relevant proportion of patients rated as having mild dementia (CDR=1.0) in fact had moderate or severe levels of disability according to the FTD-FRS. CONCLUSION: The Brazilian version of the FTD-FRS seems suitable to aid staging and determining disease progression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s1980-57642013dn74000006

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The FRS is a well-established dementia staging tool in frontotemporal dementia and has been validated in Alzheimer's disease with superior ability to stage dementia than the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale.

    “The scale is a well-established dementia staging tool in frontotemporal dementia and has been validated in Alzheimer's disease with superior ability to stage dementia than the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (Lima-Silva et al., 2013).”

    From Exploring the impact of carer stressors and psychological inflexibility on depression and anxiety in family carers of people with dementia (2020) · cites this paper as Lima-Silva et al., 2013

    The Introduction describes the FTD-FRS as a tool for staging frontotemporal dementia, and the Discussion reports that it detected moderate severity in 64% of patients with Alzheimer’s disease whom the CDR classified as mild. But the Discussion calls these results preliminary and says further psychometric study is needed; it does not establish validation in Alzheimer’s disease or overall superiority to the CDR. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lima-Silva, T. B., Bahia, V. S., Carvalho, V. A., Guimarães, H. C., Caramelli, P., Balthazar, M., Damasceno, B., Bottino, C. M. D. C., Brucki, S. M. D., Mioshi, E., Nitrini, R., & Yassuda, M. S.
Affiliations
  • University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
  • Neuroscience Research Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Yassuda, Mônica Sanches
Venue
Dementia & Neuropsychologia
Published
2013-12
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
387-396
ISSN
1980-5764 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101591602
Cited by
19
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Dementia & Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Scientific Electronic Library Online (São Paulo Research Foundation, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
frontotemporal lobar degeneration, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, Alzheimer's disease, cross-cultural adaptation, Brazilian Portuguese translation, disease staging, disease progression, disability assessment, Clinical Dementia Rating, neuropsychiatric symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review