The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards Automatic Learning of Procedures From Web Instructional Videos
Open accessAbstract
The potential for agents, whether embodied or software, to learn by observing other agents performing procedures involving objects and actions is rich. Current research on automatic procedure learning heavily relies on action labels or video subtitles, even during the evaluation phase, which makes them infeasible in real-world scenarios. This leads to our question: can the human-consensus structure of a procedure be learned from a large set of long, unconstrained videos (e.g., instructional videos from YouTube) with only visual evidence? To answer this question, we introduce the problem of procedure segmentation---to segment a video procedure into category-independent procedure segments. Given that no large-scale dataset is available for this problem, we collect a large-scale procedure segmentation dataset with procedure segments temporally localized and described; we use cooking videos and name the dataset YouCook2. We propose a segment-level recurrent network for generating procedure segments by modeling the dependencies across segments. The generated segments can be used as pre-processing for other tasks, such as dense video captioning and event parsing. We show in our experiments that the proposed model outperforms competitive baselines in procedure segmentation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.01497 · Cited by 70,812
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Show and tell: A neural image caption generator
Vinyals, O., Toshev, A., Bengio, S., & Erhan, D. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298935 · Cited by 6,318
Discovering Event Structure in Continuous Narrative Perception and Memory
Baldassano, C., Chen, J., Zadbood, A., Pillow, J. W., Hasson, U., & Norman, K. A. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.041 · Cited by 952
The Language of Actions: Recovering the Syntax and Semantics of Goal-Directed Human Activities
Kuehne, H., Arslan, A., & Serre, T. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.105 · Cited by 571
A Multi-stream Bi-directional Recurrent Neural Network for Fine-Grained Action Detection
Singh, B., Marks, T. K., Jones, M., Tuzel, O., & Shao, M. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.216 · Cited by 461
Combining embedded accelerometers with computer vision for recognizing food preparation activities
Stein, S., & McKenna, S. J. (2013) · Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing · doi:10.1145/2493432.2493482 · Cited by 448
Connectionist Temporal Modeling for Weakly Supervised Action Labeling
Huang, D.-A., Fei-Fei, L., & Niebles, J. C. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_9 · Cited by 226
Weakly supervised learning of actions from transcripts
Kuehne, H., Richard, A., & Gall, J. (2017) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2017.06.004 · Cited by 119
Cited by
Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey
Xu, P., Zhu, X., & Clifton, D. A. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2023.3275156 · Cited by 1,072
Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning
Alayrac, J.-B., Donahue, J., Luc, P., Miech, A., Barr, I., Hasson, Y., Lenc, K., Mensch, A., Millican, K., Reynolds, M., et al. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1723 · Cited by 966
From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoning
Zellers, R., Bisk, Y., Farhadi, A., & Choi, Y. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00688 · Cited by 769
MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-Around Player?
Liu, Y., Duan, H., Zhang, Y., Li, B., Zhang, S., Zhao, W., Yuan, Y., Wang, J., He, C., Liu, Z., et al. (2025) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72658-3_13 · Cited by 668
End-to-End Dense Video Captioning with Masked Transformer
Zhou, L., Zhou, Y., Corso, J. J., Socher, R., & Xiong, C. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00911 · Cited by 605
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, L., Xu, C., & Corso, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2018-04-27
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- 2374-3468
- OpenAlex
- W2952132648
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 7.62
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
