Cited by 410Sentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsEmotion and Mood Recognition

Learning Relationships between Text, Audio, and Video via Deep Canonical Correlation for Multimodal Language Analysis

Open access
Sun, Zhongkai, Sarma, Prathusha, Sethares, William, Liang, Yingyu·2020·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Multimodal language analysis often considers relationships between features based on text and those based on acoustical and visual properties. Text features typically outperform non-text features in sentiment analysis or emotion recognition tasks in part because the text features are derived from advanced language models or word embeddings trained on massive data sources while audio and video features are human-engineered and comparatively underdeveloped. Given that the text, audio, and video are describing the same utterance in different ways, we hypothesize that the multimodal sentiment analysis and emotion recognition can be improved by learning (hidden) correlations between features extracted from the outer product of text and audio (we call this text-based audio) and analogous text-based video. This paper proposes a novel model, the Interaction Canonical Correlation Network (ICCN), to learn such multimodal embeddings. ICCN learns correlations between all three modes via deep canonical correlation analysis (DCCA) and the proposed embeddings are then tested on several benchmark datasets and against other state-of-the-art multimodal embedding algorithms. Empirical results and ablation studies confirm the effectiveness of ICCN in capturing useful information from all three views.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6431

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CCA approach for multimodal fusion, originally proposed for affect recognition datasets, also generalizes to the multimedia domain.

    “In particular, while the CCA approach for multimodal fusion was originally proposed for affect recognition datasets [145], we find that they also generalize to the multimedia domain.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [Akaho 2006] Akaho, S. 2006. A kernel method for canonical correlation analysis. arXiv preprint cs/0609071 . · arXiv
  2. [Andrew et al. 2013] Andrew, G.; Arora, R.; Bilmes, J.; and Livescu, K. 2013. Deep canonical correlation analysis. In ICML , 1247-1255.
  3. [Busso et al. 2008] Busso, C.; Bulut, M.; Lee, C.-C.; Kazemzadeh, A.; Mower, E.; Kim, S.; Chang, J. N.; Lee, S.; and Narayanan, S. S. 2008. Iemocap: Interactive emotional dyadic motion capture database. Language resources and evaluation 42(4):335.
  4. [Conneau et al. 2017] Conneau, A.; Kiela, D.; Schwenk, H.; Barrault, L.; and Bordes, A. 2017. Supervised learning of universal sentence representations from natural language inference data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.02364 . · arXiv
  5. [Degottex et al. 2014] Degottex, G.; Kane, J.; Drugman, T.; Raitio, T.; and Scherer, S. 2014. Covarepa collaborative voice analysis repository for speech technologies. In ICASSP , 960-964. IEEE.
  6. [Hazarika et al. 2018] Hazarika, D.; Poria, S.; Gorantla, S.; Cambria, E.; Zimmermann, R.; and Mihalcea, R. 2018. Cascade: Contextual sarcasm detection in online discussion forums. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.06413 . · arXiv
  7. [Hotelling 1936] Hotelling, H. 1936. Relations between two set of variables. Biometrika 28(3-4):321-377.
  8. [Lawrence et al. 1997] Lawrence, S.; Giles, C. L.; Tsoi, A. C.; and Back, A. D. 1997. Face recognition: A convolutional neural-network approach. IEEE transactions on neural networks 8(1):98-113.
  9. [Lee et al. 2014] Lee, G.; Singanamalli, A.; Wang, H.; Feldman, M. D.; Master, S. R.; Shih, N. N.; Spangler, E.; Rebbeck, T.; Tomaszewski, J. E.; and Madabhushi, A. 2014. Supervised multi-view canonical correlation analysis (smvcca): Integrating histologic and proteomic features for predicting recurrent prostate cancer. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 34(1):284-297.
  10. [Liu et al. 2018] Liu, Z.; Shen, Y.; Lakshminarasimhan, V. B.; Liang, P. P.; Zadeh, A.; and Morency, L.-P. 2018. Efficient low-rank multimodal fusion with modality-specific factors. ACL .
  11. [Martin and Maes 1979] Martin, N., and Maes, H. 1979. Multivariate analysis . Academic press London.
  12. [Poria et al. 2016] Poria, S.; Chaturvedi, I.; Cambria, E.; and Hussain, A. 2016. Convolutional mkl based multimodal emotion recognition and sentiment analysis. In ICDM , 439448. IEEE.
  13. [Rotman, Vuli´ c, and Reichart 2018] Rotman, G.; Vuli´ c, I.; and Reichart, R. 2018. Bridging languages through images with deep partial canonical correlation analysis. In ACL(Volume 1: Long Papers) , 910-921.
  14. [Sarma, Liang, and Sethares 2018] Sarma, P. K.; Liang, Y.; and Sethares, W. A. 2018. Domain adapted word embeddings for improved sentiment classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.04576 . · arXiv
  15. [Sun et al. 2019] Sun, Z.; Sarma, P. K.; Sethares, W.; and Bucy, E. P. 2019. Multi-modal sentiment analysis using deep canonical correlation analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.08696 . · arXiv
  16. [Tenenhaus and Tenenhaus 2011] Tenenhaus, A., and Tenenhaus, M. 2011. Regularized generalized canonical correlation analysis. Psychometrika 76(2):257.
  17. [Tsai et al. 2018] Tsai, Y.-H. H.; Liang, P. P.; Zadeh, A.; Morency, L.-P.; and Salakhutdinov, R. 2018. Learning factorized multimodal representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.06176 . · arXiv
  18. [Wang et al. 2018] Wang, Y.; Shen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Liang, P. P.; Zadeh, A.; and Morency, L.-P. 2018. Words can shift: Dynamically adjusting word representations using nonverbal behaviors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.09362 . · arXiv
  19. [Wang, Li, and Lazebnik 2016] Wang, L.; Li, Y.; and Lazebnik, S. 2016. Learning deep structure-preserving image-text embeddings. In CVPR , 5005-5013.
  20. [Zadeh et al. 2017] Zadeh, A.; Chen, M.; Poria, S.; Cambria, E.; and Morency, L.-P. 2017. Tensor fusion network for multimodal sentiment analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.07250 . · arXiv
  21. [Zadeh et al. 2018b] Zadeh, A.; Liang, P. P.; Poria, S.; Vij, P.; Cambria, E.; and Morency, L.-P. 2018b. Multi-attention recurrent network for human communication comprehension. In AAAI .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, Z., Sarma, P., Sethares, W., & Liang, Y.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2020-04-03
Volume
34
Issue
05
Pages
8992-8999
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W3037572520
Cited by
410
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 11
FWCI
18.12
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (public-domain)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
deep canonical correlation analysis, multimodal embeddings, sentiment analysis, emotion recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review