Cited by 25Sentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningEmotion and Mood RecognitionMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Multimodal Sentiment Analysis Based on Cross-Modal Attention and Gated Cyclic Hierarchical Fusion Networks

Open access
Quan, Zhibang, Sun, Tao, Su, Mengli, Wei, Jishu·2022·Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience

Abstract

Multimodal sentiment analysis has been an active subfield in natural language processing. This makes multimodal sentiment tasks challenging due to the use of different sources for predicting a speaker’s sentiment. Previous research has focused on extracting single contextual information within a modality and trying different modality fusion stages to improve prediction accuracy. However, a factor that may lead to poor model performance is that this does not consider the variability between modalities. Furthermore, existing fusion methods tend to extract the representational information of individual modalities before fusion. This ignores the critical role of intermodal interaction information for model prediction. This paper proposes a multimodal sentiment analysis method based on cross-modal attention and gated cyclic hierarchical fusion network MGHF. MGHF is based on the idea of distribution matching, which enables modalities to obtain representational information with a synergistic effect on the overall sentiment orientation in the temporal interaction phase. After that, we designed a gated cyclic hierarchical fusion network that takes text-based acoustic representation, text-based visual representation, and text representation as inputs and eliminates redundant information through a gating mechanism to achieve effective multimodal representation interaction fusion. Our extensive experiments on two publicly available and popular multimodal datasets show that MGHF has significant advantages over previous complex and robust baselines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2022/4767437

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gated fusion uses mechanisms such as neural network gates or attention mechanisms to dynamically emphasize or de-emphasize different aspects or modalities of the data based on the context.

    “Gated fusion [145,146] uses mechanisms such as neural network gates or attention mechanisms to dynamically emphasize or de-emphasize different aspects or modalities of the data based on the context.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quan, Z., Sun, T., Su, M., & Wei, J.
Affiliations
Qilu University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Sun, Tao
Venue
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-08-09
Volume
2022
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 1687-5265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-5273
OpenAlex
W4292438865
Cited by
25
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Basic Research Program of China (2019YFB1404700)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
multimodal sentiment analysis, cross-modal attention, cross-modal interaction, distribution matching, gating mechanism, temporal interactions
MeSH terms
Sentiment Analysis, Attention, Natural Language Processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review