Cited by 28Digital Communication and LanguageLinguistic research and analysisDigital Marketing and Social Media

Write like i write: Herding in the language of online reviews

Open access
Michael, Loizos, Otterbacher, Jahna·2014·Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Abstract

Our behaviors often converge with those of others, and language within social media is no exception. We consider reviews of tourist attractions at TripAdvisor (TA), the world's largest resource for travel information. Unlike social networking sites, TA review forums do not facilitate direct interaction between participants. Nonetheless, theory suggests that language is guided by writers' conception of their audience, and that their style can shift in response. We implement a model of herding as a local transmission process, exploring the hypothesis that a reviewer is influenced by how preceding reviews manifest a given stylistic feature (e.g., pronouns, paralinguistic devices). We find that reviewers are more likely to use unusual features when such characteristics appear in their local context. The extent to which reviewers are influenced by context is correlated to attributes shared in their profiles, as well as their sentiment toward the attraction reviewed. Our results suggest that language can be influenced by others, even in an asynchronous environment with little to no interpersonal interaction. In other words, our behaviors may be susceptible to manipulation in social media; it may not always be the case that we write like ourselves.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14511

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior ratings and reviews introduce significant bias in individual rating behavior and writing style, creating a herding effect.

    “prior ratings and reviews introduce significant bias in individual rating behavior and writing style, creating a herding effect”

    From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Michael and Otterbacher, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michael, L., & Otterbacher, J.
Affiliations
Open University of Cyprus (CY)
Venue
Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
Published
2014-05-16
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
356-365
ISSN
  • 2162-3449 (ISSN-L)
  • 2334-0770
OpenAlex
W818634956
Cited by
28
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.31
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • Kypseli (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistic research and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
herding behavior, online reviews, TripAdvisor, tourist attractions, stylistic features, local transmission, social influence, pronouns, sentiment, asynchronous interaction, social media language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review