Cited by 607Muscle activation and electromyography studiesProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Control of Multifunctional Prosthetic Hands by Processing the Electromyographic Signal

Zecca, M., Micera, Silvestro, Carrozza, M. C., Dario, P.·2002·Critical Reviews? in Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

The human hand is a complex system, with a large number of degrees of freedom (DoFs), sensors embedded in its structure, actuators and tendons, and a complex hierarchical control. Despite this complexity, the efforts required to the user to carry out the different movements is quite small (albeit after an appropriate and lengthy training). On the contray, prosthetic hands are just a pale replication of the natural hand, with significantly reduced grasping capabilities and no sensory information delivered back to the user. Several attempts have been carried out to develop multifunctional prosthetic devices controlled by electromyographic (EMG) signals (myoelectric hands), harness (kinematic hands), dimensional changes in residual muscles, and so forth, but none ofthese methods permits the "natural" control of more than two DoFs. This article presents a review of the traditional methods used to control artificial hands by means of EMG signal, in both the clinical and research contexts, and introduces what could be the future developments in the control strategy of these devices.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v30.i456.80

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 607

Metadata

Authors
Zecca, M., Micera, S., Carrozza, M. C., & Dario, P.
Affiliations
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
Venue
Critical Reviews? in Biomedical Engineering
Publisher
Begell House
Published
2002
Volume
30
Issue
4-6
Pages
459-485
ISSN
0278-940X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4242470988
Cited by
606
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 38
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
prosthetic hand, myoelectric control, EMG signal processing, degrees of freedom, grasping, sensory feedback
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Limbs, Electromyography, Feedback, Hand, Hand Injuries, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Prosthesis Design, Quality Control, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review