Cited by 62Cancer survivorship and careDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Results of the Optimune trial: A randomized controlled trial evaluating a novel Internet intervention for breast cancer survivors

Open access
Holtdirk, Franziska, Mehnert, Anja, Weiss, Mario, Mayer, Johannes, Meyer, Björn, Bröde, Peter, Claus, Maren, Watzl, Carsten·2021·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Introduction: After the acute treatment phase, breast cancer patients often experience low quality of life and impaired mental health, which could potentially be improved by offering cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and addressing exercise and dietary habits. However, CBT and other behavioural interventions are rarely available beyond the acute treatment phase. Internet-based interventions could bridge such treatment gaps, given their flexibility and scalability. In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), we investigated the effects of such an intervention (“ Optimune ”) over three months. Methods: This RCT included 363 female breast cancer survivors (age range = 30–70), recruited from the community, who had completed the active treatment phase. Inclusion criteria were: breast cancer diagnosis less than 5 years ago and acute treatment completion at least 1 month ago. Participants were randomly assigned to (1) an intervention group ( n = 181), in which they received care as usual (CAU) plus 12-month access to Optimune immediately after randomization, or (2) a control group ( n = 182), in which they received CAU and Optimune after a delay of 3 months. Primary endpoints were quality of life (QoL), physical activity, and dietary habits at three months. We hypothesized that intervention group participants would report better QoL, more physical activity, and improved dietary habits after 3 months. Results: Intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses revealed significant effects on QoL ( d = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.07–0.48) and dietary habits ( d = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.15–0.56), but the effect on physical exercise was not significant ( d = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.10–0.51). Discussion: These findings suggest the effectiveness of Optimune , a new CBT-based Internet intervention for breast cancer survivors, in facilitating improvements in quality of life and dietary habits. Efforts to disseminate this intervention more broadly may be warranted. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03643640 . Registered August 23rd 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03643640 .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0251276

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Depression in cancer patients is associated with a higher risk of suicide and systemic inflammation, which may worsen long-term health outcomes.

    “Depression, in particular, has been associated with a higher risk of suicide and systemic infammation, which may worsen long-term health outcomes [4,7].”

    From Internet‐Based Telecare and Bibliotherapy Delivery of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Reducing Anxiety and Depression in Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. (2026) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says psychological distress in breast cancer survivors—including depression—may be linked to chronic systemic inflammation, which could predict a worse prognosis over time. It does not address suicide risk, and its inflammation statement concerns psychological distress broadly rather than depression specifically. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holtdirk, F., Mehnert, A., Weiss, M., Mayer, J., Meyer, B., Bröde, P., Claus, M., & Watzl, C.
Affiliations
  • GAIA (Germany) (DE)
  • University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
  • TU Dortmund University (DE)
Corresponding author
Meyer, Björn
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2021-05-07
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
e0251276
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3159954902
Cited by
62
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Gaia, Germany
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
breast cancer survivors, online intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy, quality of life, dietary habits, physical activity
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Internet-Based Intervention, Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Diet, Female, Humans, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review