Harderian gland tumorigenesis: low-dose- and LET-response
Abstract
Increased cancer risk remains a primary concern for travel into deep space and may preclude manned missions to Mars due to large uncertainties that currently exist in estimating cancer risk from the spectrum of radiations found in space with the very limited available human epidemiological radiation-induced cancer data. Existing data on human risk of cancer from X-ray and gamma-ray exposure must be scaled to the many types and fluences of radiations found in space using radiation quality factors and dose-rate modification factors, and assuming linearity of response since the shapes of the dose responses at low doses below 100 mSv are unknown. The goal of this work was to reduce uncertainties in the relative biological effect (RBE) and linear energy transfer (LET) relationship for space-relevant doses of charged-particle radiation-induced carcinogenesis. The historical data from the studies of Fry et al. and Alpen et al. for Harderian gland (HG) tumors in the female CB6F1 strain of mouse represent the most complete set of experimental observations, including dose dependence, available on a specific radiation-induced tumor in an experimental animal using heavy ion beams that are found in the cosmic radiation spectrum. However, these data lack complete information on low-dose responses below 0.1 Gy, and for chronic low-dose-rate exposures, and there are gaps in the LET region between 25 and 190 keV/μm. In this study, we used the historical HG tumorigenesis data as reference, and…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A similar functional response provided an optimal global fit to the Harderian gland tumor study with several heavy ions.
“A similar functional response provided an optimal global fit to the Harderian gland tumor study with several heavy ions (Chang et al., 2016;Cucinotta et al., 2018).”
From A proposed change to astronaut exposures limits is a giant leap backwards for radiation protection (2021) · cites this paper as Chang et al., 2016
In Harderian gland tumors in B6CF1 female mice, the dose response for Fe particles was qualitatively different from γ-rays.
“Harderian Gland Tumors in B6CF1 female mice (Chang et al., 2016;Fry et al., 1985;Alpen et al., 1993) Dose response for Fe particles was qualitatively different from γ-rays.”
From A proposed change to astronaut exposures limits is a giant leap backwards for radiation protection (2021) · cites this paper as Chang et al., 2016
Cites
How Safe Is Safe Enough? Radiation Risk for a Human Mission to Mars
Cucinotta, F. A., Kim, M.-H. Y., Chappell, L. J., & Huff, J. L. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074988 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Self-citationTumorigenic Potential of High-Z, High-LET Charged-Particle Radiations
Alpen, E. L., Powers-Risius, P., Curtis, S. B., & DeGuzman, R. (1993) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3578551 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Weil, M. M., Bedford, J. S., Bielefeldt-Ohmann, H., Ray, F. A., Genik, P. C., Ehrhart, E. J., Fallgren, C. M., Hailu, F., Battaglia, C. L. R., Charles, B., et al. (2009) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr1648.1 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
A New Approach to Reduce Uncertainties in Space Radiation Cancer Risk Predictions
Cucinotta, F. A. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120717 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
First measurements of the radiation dose on the lunar surface
Zhang, S., Wimmer-Schweingruber, R. F., Yu, J., Wang, C., Fu, Q., Zou, Y., Sun, Y., Wang, C., Hou, D., Böttcher, S. I., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz1334 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Parihar, V. K., Maroso, M., Syage, A., Allen, B. D., Angulo, M. C., Soltesz, I., & Limoli, C. L. (2018) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2018.03.009 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
A proposed change to astronaut exposures limits is a giant leap backwards for radiation protection
Cucinotta, F. A., Schimmerling, W., Blakely, E. A., & Hei, T. K. (2021) · Life Sciences in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2021.07.005 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Chang, P. Y., Cucinotta, F. A., Bjornstad, K. A., Bakke, J., Rosen, C. J., Du, N., Fairchild, D. G., Cacao, E., & Blakely, E. A.
- Affiliations
- SRI International (US)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Blakely, Eleanor A.
- Venue
- Radiation Research
- Publisher
- Radiation Research Society
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 185
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 449-460
- ISSN
- 0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-5404
- OpenAlex
- W2336635052
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Radiation Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R24DK084970)
- Brookhaven National Laboratory
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
- Keywords
- heavy ion irradiation, linear energy transfer, relative biological effectiveness, cosmic rays, CB6F1 mice, titanium ions, silicon ions
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Extraterrestrial Environment, Female, Harderian Gland, Male, Radiation Dosage, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Linear Energy Transfer, Uncertainty, Mice, Carcinogenesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review