Cited by 155Adrenal Hormones and DisordersSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchMyasthenia Gravis and Thymoma

The natural history of adrenal function in autoimmune patients with adrenal autoantibodies

Betterle, C., Scalici, C., Presotto, F., Pedini, B., Moro, L., Rigon, F., Mantero, F.·1988·Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

Adrenal autoantibodies (AA) were found in 23 of 2571 (0.9%) patients with organ-specific autoimmune diseases, in one of 632 first-degree relatives of insulin-dependent diabetic patients, and in none of 375 normal controls. In AA-positive subjects the prevalence of human leucocyte antigens (HLA)-A1, -B8 and -DR3 was significantly higher with respect to the general population. Two groups were followed (15 subjects persistently positive for AA and 51 negative subjects) for a mean period of 3.2 years. Yearly tests were made for AA and adrenal function. Of the 15 subjects persistently positive for AA, six developed Addison's disease after a period varying from 6 months to 10 years. Of the 51 subjects initially negative, two became positive during follow-up, and one of these developed Addison's disease 15 months later. In contrast, all the remaining 49 persistently negative subjects maintained normal adrenal function tests. Overall, of the 17 positive subjects, seven (41%) developed Addison's disease, three (18%) showed various degrees of subclinical adrenocortical failure and the remaining seven maintained normal glandular function. In the positive patients the yearly incidence of detriment in adrenal function was 19%. Patients who developed Addison's disease showed significant association with HLA-B8 phenotype. The development from normal adrenocortical function to overt Addison's disease seemed to progress through four distinct stages of functional impairment: increased plasma r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1677/joe.0.1170467

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Betterle, C., Scalici, C., Presotto, F., Pedini, B., Moro, L., Rigon, F., & Mantero, F.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Venue
Journal of Endocrinology
Published
1988-06-01
Volume
117
Issue
3
Pages
467-475
ISSN
  • 0022-0795 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-6805
OpenAlex
W1990429184
Cited by
155
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Keywords
adrenal autoantibodies, Addison's disease, adrenal insufficiency, autoimmune disease, HLA-B8, HLA-DR3, HLA-A1, plasma renin activity, ACTH stimulation test, cortisol, disease progression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adrenal Glands, Adult, Autoantibodies, Autoimmune Diseases, Female, HLA Antigens, Humans, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review