The DOI matches its Crossref record; 403 of the 403 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Realising REDD+: national strategy and policy options
Open accessAbstract
CIFOR advances human wellbeing, environmental conservation and equity by conducting research to inform policies and practices
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
Munger, M. C., & North, D. C. (1991) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1060065 · Cited by 24,871
(1980) · Cited by 22,286
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Field, B. C., & Ostrom, E. (1992) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146384 · Cited by 18,859
The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Richards, J. W. (1915) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.42.1074.161 · Cited by 13,983
Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · Cited by 9,953
(2007) · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · Cited by 9,690
Mauro, P. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2946696 · Cited by 8,820
Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies
Swidler, A. (1986) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095521 · Cited by 8,661
A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
Ostrom, E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172133 · Cited by 8,656
Institutions and organizations
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1848 · Cited by 8,003
Cited by
Porter-Bolland, L., Ellis, E. A., Guariguata, M. R., Ruiz-Mallén, I., Negrete-Yankelevich, S., & Reyes-García, V. (2012) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.034 · Cited by 755
McDermott, M., Mahanty, S., & Schreckenberg, K. (2013) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006 · Cited by 645
Putz, F. E., Zuidema, P. A., Synnott, T., Peña‐Claros, M., Pinard, M. A., Sheil, D., Vanclay, J. K., Sist, P., Gourlet‐Fleury, S., Griscom, B., et al. (2012) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00242.x · Cited by 620
Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices
A., A., M., B., W.D., S., L., V., & eds (2012) · Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks · doi:10.17528/cifor/003805 · Cited by 477
Self-citationMulti-level governance and power in climate change policy networks
Di Gregorio, M., Fatorelli, L., Paavola, J., Locatelli, B., Pramova, E., Nurrochmat, D. R., May, P. H., Brockhaus, M., Sari, I. M., & Kusumadewi, S. D. (2019) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.003 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- A., A., M., B., M., K., E., S., W.D., S., S., W.-K., & (eds.)
- Venue
- Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks
- Published
- 2009
- OpenAlex
- W1501662969
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 403
- FWCI
- 42.55
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Realising REDD+: national strategy and policy options. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17528/cifor/002871
- The paper
- A., A., M., B., M., K., E., S., W.D., S., S., W.-K., & (eds.). (2009). Realising REDD+: national strategy and policy options. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/002871
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
