CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 134Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementIndigenous Peoples' Rights and LawIndigenous Cultures and History

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Possibility of Difference: Rethinking Co-management

Stevenson, Marc G.·2006·Human Organization
DOI 10.17730/humo.65.2.b2dm8thgb7wa4m53
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Many of Canada’s Aboriginal peoples have adopted the language, concepts and procedures of environmental resource management in order to advance their needs, rights and interests in co-management. Drawing on the author’s experiences in co-management, the advantages and disadvantages of this project for Canada, its Aboriginal peoples, and its landscapes are explored. Alternatives to the status quo, grounded in social, cultural and ecological sustainability, and modelled after the two-row wampum, are then considered. Both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal parties to co-management must critically examine current management policies and practices in order to develop innovative approaches that will create the space required for the meaningful and equitable inclusion of Aboriginal peoples in decisions taken in respect to their lands and resources.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17730/humo.65.2.b2dm8thgb7wa4m53

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Adams W.H. 2002 When Nature Won’t Stay Still: Conservation Equilibrium and Control. In Decolonizing Nature: Strategies for Conservation in a Post-colonial Era. W.M.Adams and M.Mulligan (eds) pp. 220-246 Earthscan London.
  2. Boyd R. (Ed.) 1999 Indians Fire and the Land in the Pacific Northwest. Oregon State University Press Corvallis Oregon.
  3. Derrida J. 1990 The Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority. Cardozzo Law Review 11:5–6.
  4. Egede I. 1996 Verbal presentation. In Circumpolar Aboriginal People and Co-management Practice: Current Issues in Co-management and Environmental Assessment. Proceedings of the Workshop on Circumpolar People and Co-management Practice 20-24 November 1995 Inuvik NWT. K.Roberts (ed) Arctic Institute of North America Calgary.
  5. Feit H.A. 1988 Self-management and State-management: Forms of Knowing and Managing Northern Wildlife. In Traditional Knowledge and Renewable Resources Management in Northern Regions. M.M.R.Freeman and L.N.Carbyn (eds.). Occasional PublicationNo. 23 pp. 72-91 Boreal Institute for Northern Studies Edmonton.
  6. Feit H.A. 1998 Reflections on Local Knowledge and Wildlife Resource Management: Differences Dominance and Decentralization. In Aboriginal Environmental Knowledge in the North: Definitions and Dimensions pp. 123-148. Groupe d’etudes Inuit et Circumpolaires University of Laval Quebec.
  7. Freeman M.M.R. L. Bogoslovskayas R.A.Caufiled I.Egede I.I.Krupnik and M.G. Stevenson 1998 Inuit Whaling and Sustainability. Altamira Press Walnut Creek CA.
  8. Howard A. and F.Widdowson 1996 Traditional Knowledge Threatens Environmental Assessment. Policy Options 17(9):34–36.
  9. Hotchkis R. and L. Dreidger 1992 Distance Education in Northern Remote Communities: Understanding Social Networks Change and Process. In Distance Education and Sustainable Community Development D. Wall and M.Owen (eds.) pp. 39-48 Canadian Circumpolar Institute Press and Athabasca University Press Edmonton.
  10. Innes L. 1997 Aboriginal Rights and Interpretative Responsibility. Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law 4(3):1–18.
  11. Klein D.R. 1994 Wilderness: A Western European Concept Alien to Arctic Cultures. Information North 20(3):1–8.
  12. Langdon S. J. 2002 Construing“Conservation”: An Examination of Conceptual Construction and Application to Yupik Cultural Practice. Paper presented at the 9th Conference on Hunting and Gathering Societies Edinburgh Scotland 9-13 September 2002.
  13. Nadasdy P. 2003 Hunters and Bureaucrats: Power Knowledge and Aboriginal-state Relations in the Southwest Yukon. UBC Press Vancouver.
  14. Natcher D. and S.Davis 2005 Rethinking Devolution: Challenges for Aboriginal Resource Management in the Yukon Territory. Society and Natural Resources (under review).
  15. Oshrenko G. 1988 Wildlife Management in the North American Arctic: The Case for Co-management. In Traditional Knowledge and Renewable Resources Management in Northern Regions. Occasional Publication No. 23 M.M.R.Freeman and L.N.Carbyn (eds.) pp. 99-104 Boreal Institute for Northern Studies Edmonton.
  16. Pinkerton E. 1993 Co-management Efforts as Social Movements. Alternatives 19(3):33–38.
  17. Roberts W. 2005 Restoring Aboriginal Cultural Landscapes with Iskatewizaagegan No. 39 Indpendent First Nation Shoal Lake Ontario. Masters Thesis University of Manitoba Winnipeg.
  18. Stevenson M. G. 1997a Inuit and Co-management. Paper Presented at the North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission’s Conference on Sealing St. John’s Newfoundland 25-27November1997.
  19. Stevenson M. G. 1999 What Are We Managing? Traditional Systems of Management and Knowledge in Cooperative and Joint Management. In Science and Practice: Sustaining the Boreal Forest. T.S.Veeman D.W.Smith B.G.Purdy F.J.Salkie G. A.Larkin (eds) pp.161-169 Sustainable Forest Management Network Edmonton.
  20. Stevenson M. G. 2000 No its Not Just Like Gardening: Colonial Discourse and Traditional Ecological Knowledge in the Modern World. Paper presented at the Canadian Indigenous/Native Studies Association Annual Conference 28-31 May 2000 Edmonton.
  21. Stevenson M. G. 2004a Decolonizing Co-management in Northern Canada. Cultural Survival Quarterly 28(1):68–72.
  22. Terborgh J. 1999 Requiem for Nature. Island Press Washington DC.
  23. Usher P.J. 1986 Devolution of Power in the Northwest Territories: Implications for Wildlife Management. In Native People and Renewable Resource Management pp. 69-80. Alberta Society of Professional Biologists Edmonton.
  24. Usher P.J. 1993 The Beverly-Kaminuruak Caribou Management Board: An Experience in Co-management. In Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Concepts and Cases. J.T. Inglis (ed) pp. 111-120 International Development Research Centre Ottawa.
  25. Wagner M.W. 1991 Footsteps Along the Road: Indian Land Claims and Access to Natural Resources. Alternatives 18(2):23–27.
  26. Whorf B. L. 1956 The Relation of Habitual Thought to Language. In Language Thought and Reality. B.L.Whorf (ed.) pp 134-159 Cambridge Technology Press.
  27. Williams N. and E.Hunn 1982 Resource Managers: North American and Australian Hunter-gatherers. Westview Press Boulder.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Stevenson, M. G.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Stevenson, Marc G.
Venue
Human Organization
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2006-06
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
167-180
ISSN
  • 0018-7259 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3525
DOI
10.17730/humo.65.2.b2dm8thgb7wa4m53
OpenAlex
W2063634883
Cited by
134
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Organization (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
Keywords
co-management, Aboriginal peoples, environmental resource management, Two Row Wampum, socio-cultural sustainability, environmental sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review