The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainable Production of Second-Generation Biofuels: Potential and Perspectives in Major Economies and Developing Countries
Open accessAbstract
Global biofuel production has been increasing rapidly over the last decade, but the expanding biofuel industry has recently raised important concerns. In particular, the sustainability of many first-generation biofuels – which are produced primarily from food crops such as grains, sugar cane and vegetable oils – has been increasingly questioned over concerns such as reported displacement of food-crops, effects on the environment and climate change. In general, there is growing consensus that if significant emission reductions in the transport sector are to be achieved, biofuel technologies must become more efficient in terms of net lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions while at the same time be socially and environmentally sustainable. It is increasingly understood that most first-generation biofuels, with the exception of sugar cane ethanol, will likely have a limited role in the future transport fuel mix. The increasing criticism of the sustainability of many first-generation biofuels has raised attention to the potential of so-called second-generation biofuels. Depending on the feedstock choice and the cultivation technique, second-generation biofuel production has the potential to provide benefits such as consuming waste residues and making use of abandoned land. In this way, the new fuels could offer considerable potential to promote rural development and improve economic conditions in emerging and developing regions. However, while second-generation biofuel crops and production technologies are more efficient, their production could become unsustainable if they compete with food crops for available land. Thus, their sustainability will depend on whether producers comply with criteria like minimum lifecycle GHG reductions, including land use change, and social standards.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change
Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R. A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., & Yu, T.-H. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151861 · Cited by 4,888 · cited 1×
“Some authors (Fargione et al., 2008; Searchinger et al., 2008) evaluated the impact of this indirect land use change.”
Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Hawthorne, P. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152747 · Cited by 3,902
The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland.
Mucina, L., & Rutherford, M. C. (2006) · Murdoch University Research Portal · Cited by 3,012
UNDP – United Nations Development Programme
Klingebiel, S., & Hildebrand, M. (2010) · A Concise Encyclopedia of the United Nations · doi:10.1163/ej.9789004180048.i-962.604 · Cited by 1,678
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-4490 · Cited by 1,218
The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studies
Berndes, G., Hoogwijk, M., & van den Broek, R. (2003) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/s0961-9534(02)00185-x · Cited by 1,149
The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19
Mucina, L., Rutherford, M. C., & Powrie, L. W. (2006) · Cited by 1,073
Cherubini, F., Bird, N. D., Cowie, A., Jungmeier, G., Schlamadinger, B., & Woess-Gallasch, S. (2009) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.013 · Cited by 973
Macedo, I. C., Seabra, J. E. A., & Silva, J. E. A. R. (2008) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.12.006 · Cited by 943
World agriculture: towards 2015/2030: an FAO perspective
Thomson, K. J. (2003) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/s0264-8377(03)00047-4 · Cited by 868
Cited by
Ghimire, A., Frunzo, L., Pirozzi, F., Trably, E., Escudie, R., Lens, P. N. L., & Esposito, G. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.045 · Cited by 1,027
The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment
Popp, J., Lakner, Z., Harangi-Rákos, M., & Fári, M. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.056 · Cited by 967
Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment
Creutzig, F., Ravindranath, N. H., Berndes, G., Bolwig, S., Bright, R., Cherubini, F., Chum, H., Corbera, E., Delucchi, M., Faaij, A., et al. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12205 · Cited by 752
Alternative fuels for internal combustion engines
Bae, C., & Kim, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the Combustion Institute · doi:10.1016/j.proci.2016.09.009 · Cited by 622
Mohr, A., & Raman, S. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.033 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Venue
- IEA Energy Papers
- Published
- 2010-02-01
- ISSN
- 2079-2581 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153011973
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 41
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainable Production of Second-Generation Biofuels: Potential and Perspectives in Major Economies and Developing Countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1787/5kmh3njpt6r0-en
- The paper
- Sustainable Production of Second-Generation Biofuels: Potential and Perspectives in Major Economies and Developing Countries. (2010). IEA Energy Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kmh3njpt6r0-en
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.