Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4Innovation and Knowledge ManagementKnowledge Management and SharingManagement and Organizational Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The roles of knowledge acquisition activities and organizational communication on innovation: focusing on the mediation effect of organizational trust to the subjects of power

Open access
오석영·2013·The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18211/kjhrdq.2013.15.4.005

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 김정환, HRD연구, 15, 83
  2. 오석영, 고용직업능력개발연구, 14, 75
  3. 이성엽, HRD연구, 11, 1
  4. 전기석, HRD연구, 15, 307
  5. 장덕호, 교육행정학연구, 28, 175
  6. Crossan, M. M., Academy of Management Review, 24, 522, 10.5465/amr.1999.2202135 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Lawrence, T. B., Academy of Management Review, 26, 624, 10.5465/amr.2001.5393901 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Nonaka, I., Organization Science, 32, 7
  9. Rowley J., Management Decision, 47, 1323

Cited by

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
오석영
Corresponding author
오석영
Venue
The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly
Published
2013-11
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
101-123
ISSN
1229-5086 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2625620951
Cited by
4
References
30
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Organizational Practices
Keywords
organizational communication, innovation, organizational trust, mediating effect, power relations, knowledge management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.