Cited by 26Coffee research and impactsFood and Agricultural SciencesFermentation and Sensory Analysis

Can Cold Brew Coffee Be Convenient? A Pilot Study For Caffeine Content in Cold Brew Coffee Concentrate Using High Performance Liquid Chromatography

Open access
Lane, Sarah, Palmer, Josh, Christie, Brian, Ehlting, Juergen, Le, Cuong·2017·The Arbutus Review

Abstract

Cold brew coffee is a brewing method that is increasing in prevalence. While it has been anecdotally suggested that this method may provide a more aromatic and flavourful coffee product, there is little research published that looks at the concentration of caffeine or other coffee substituents in cold brew coffee. The potential alteration in chemical composition in cold brew provides a few interesting avenues for research. Can caffeine in cold brew be quantified by conventional methods? If so, how does the caffeine profile of cold brews relate to hot brew methods? Here we report the caffeine content and variability in small batch cold brew coffee and show that HPLC/UV-Vis, a standard method for quantitation of caffeine in other extraction methods, is useful for detection of caffeine in cold brew coffee. The mean concentration of caffeine in an average 355 mL serving was found to be 207.22 ± 39.17 mg over five distinct batches of cold brew coffee concentrate. Cold brew preparation methods produce similar quantities of caffeine as hot brew preparation, yet may have increased storage capabilities including improved retention of flavonoids and other secondary metabolites. Therefore, cold brew may provide utility in clinical trials examining caffeine and the effect of other components of coffee as it is commonly consumed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18357/tar81201716816

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An exhaustive literature search returned only four peer-reviewed studies related to cold brew coffee.

    “An exhaustive literature search returned only four peer-reviewed studies related to cold brew coffee29–32.”

    From Acidity and Antioxidant Activity of Cold Brew Coffee (2018) · cites this paper as [30]

    The paper's section C says that, to the authors' knowledge, few peer-reviewed studies had examined caffeine or secondary psychoactive components in cold brew. It does not report an exhaustive literature search or a count of four studies, and its statement is narrower than studies related to cold brew coffee generally. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lane, S., Palmer, J., Christie, B., Ehlting, J., & Le, C.
Affiliations
University of Victoria (CA)
Venue
The Arbutus Review
Published
2017-10-30
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
15-23
ISSN
1923-1334 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765988422
Cited by
26
References
15
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Arbutus Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Keywords
cold brew coffee, caffeine content, caffeine quantification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review