Cited by 62Coffee research and impactsFood Chemistry and Fat AnalysisFermentation and Sensory Analysis

Extraction of espresso coffee by using gradient of temperature. Effect on physicochemical and sensorial characteristics of espresso

Salamanca, C. Alejandra, Fiol, Núria, González, Carlos, Saez, Marc, Villaescusa, Isabel·2017·Food Chemistry

Abstract

Espresso extraction is generally carried out at a fixed temperature within the range 85-95°C. In this work the extraction of the espressos was made in a new generation coffee machine that enables temperature profiling of the brewing water. The effect of using gradient of temperature to brew espressos on physicochemical and sensorial characteristics of the beverage has been investigated. Three different extraction temperature profiles were tested: updrawn gradient (88-93°C), downdrawn gradient (93-88°C) and fixed temperature (90°C). The coffee species investigated were Robusta, Arabica natural and Washed Arabica. Results proved that the use of gradient temperature for brewing espressos allows increasing or decreasing the extraction of some chemical compounds from coffee grounds. Moreover an appropriate gradient of temperature can highlight or hide some sensorial attributes. In conclusion, the possibility of programming gradient of temperature in the coffee machines recently introduced in the market opens new expectations in the field of espresso brewing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.120

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some differences were observed when espresso was prepared using a temperature gradient (ramping up or ramping down between 88 °C and 93 °C) compared to a fixed temperature (90 °C), with the "ramp up" gradient espressos evaluated more favourably by panellists than the espressos prepared with fixed or "ramp down" gradients in brewing temperature.

    “Some differences were also observed when espresso was prepared using a temperature gradient (ramping up or ramping down between 88 °C and 93 °C) compared to a fixed temperature (90 °C), with the “ramp up” gradient espressos evaluated more favourably by panellists than the espressos prepared with fixed or “ramp down” gradients in brewing temperature27.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salamanca, C. A., Fiol, N., González, C., Saez, M., & Villaescusa, I.
Affiliations
Universitat de Girona (ES)
Corresponding author
Fiol, Núria
Venue
Food Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
214
Pages
622-630
ISSN
0308-8146 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2505291553
Cited by
62
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Keywords
espresso, temperature gradient, coffee extraction, Coffea canephora, Coffea arabica, physicochemical properties, sensory properties, coffee machines
MeSH terms
Coffee, Hot Temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review