Cited by 416Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Ethical Issues of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Healthcare

Open access
Farhud, Dariush D., Zokaei, Shaghayegh·2021·Iranian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

The article's abstract is not available.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18502/ijph.v50i11.7600

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Training AI systems with culturally representative data and considering local ethical and regulatory contexts may improve trust, relevance, and uptake.

    “Training AI systems with culturally representative data and considering local ethical and regulatory contexts may improve trust, relevance, and uptake [87].”

    From Generative AI Mental Health Chatbots as Therapeutic Tools: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Their Role in Reducing Mental Health Issues (2025) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Introduction says practitioners should consider medical ethics before integrating AI into healthcare, and the Privacy and Data Protection section discusses legal safeguards in different jurisdictions (page numbers unavailable). The paper does not say that culturally representative training data or attention to local contexts improves trust, relevance, or uptake. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Integration of AI into emotionally sensitive domains such as oncology introduces a new set of unresolved ethical, relational, and epistemological challenges.

    “However, despite these advances, the integration of AI into emotionally sensitive domains such as oncology introduces a new set of unresolved ethical, relational, and epistemological challenges [12].”

    From Empathic AI for Patient-Centered Cancer Care: A Scoping Review of Patient Navigation, Support, and Clinical Practice (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Introduction identifies ethical challenges in healthcare AI, and its “Medical Consultation, Empathy, and Sympathy” section discusses difficulties with empathy and patient–clinician relationships. The paper does not specifically address oncology or identify epistemological challenges, so those parts of the attributed claim are not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6]Farhud DD (2019). Epigenetic and Ethics: How are Ethical Traits Inherited? International Journal of Ethics & Society (IJES), 1: 1– 4.
  2. [11]Informed Consent: American Medical Association (AMA). https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/informed-consent

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farhud, D. D., & Zokaei, S.
Affiliations
  • Iranian Academy of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR)
Corresponding author
Farhud, Dariush D.
Venue
Iranian Journal of Public Health
Published
2021-10-27
Volume
50
Issue
11
Pages
i-v
ISSN
  • 0304-4556 (ISSN-L)
  • 2251-6093
  • 2251-6085
OpenAlex
W3207467282
Cited by
416
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 144 · 2023: 32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Iranian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
artificial intelligence, medical ethics, health care ethics, ethical considerations, artificial intelligence in healthcare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review