Cited by 55Frailty in Older AdultsGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management

Quantitative characterization of biological age and frailty based on locomotor activity records

Open access
Pyrkov, Timothy V., Getmantsev, Evgeny, Zhurov, Boris, Avchaciov, Konstantin, Pyatnitskiy, Mikhail, Menshikov, Leonid, Khodova, Kristina, Gudkov, Andrei V. +1 more·2018·Aging

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We performed a systematic evaluation of the relationships between locomotor activity and signatures of frailty, morbidity, and mortality risks using physical activity records from the 2003-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and UK BioBank (UKB). We proposed a statistical description of the locomotor activity tracks and transformed the provided time series into vectors representing physiological states for each participant. The Principal Component Analysis of the transformed data revealed a winding trajectory with distinct segments corresponding to subsequent human development stages. The extended linear phase starts from 35-40 years old and is associated with the exponential increase of mortality risks according to the Gompertz mortality law. We characterized the distance traveled along the aging trajectory as a natural measure of biological age and demonstrated its significant association with frailty and hazardous lifestyles, along with the remaining lifespan and healthspan of an individual. The biological age explained most of the variance of the log-hazard ratio that was obtained by fitting directly to mortality and the incidence of chronic diseases. Our findings highlight the intimate relationship between the supervised and unsupervised signatures of the biological age and frailty, a consequence of the low intrinsic dimensionality of the aging dynamics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18632/aging.101603

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Principal component analysis-based biological age estimators, which involve unsupervised dimensionality reduction to unbiasedly identify ageing signals, seemingly perform even better than clocks that train on chronological age.

    “This concept has been demonstrated by principal component analysis-based biological age estimators, which involve unsupervised dimensionality reduction to unbiasedly identify ageing signals, seemingly even better than clocks that train on chronological age173–175.”

    From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [175]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]Liu Z, Kuo PL, Horvath S, Crimmins E, Ferrucci L, Levine M. Phenotypic age: a novel signature of mortality and morbidity risk. bioRxiv. 2018 363291 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/07/05/363291
  2. [12]Feldman RS. Development across the life span. Prentice Hall, 2003.
  3. [24]Podolskiy D, Molodtcov I, Zenin A, Kogan V, Menshikov LI, Gladyshev V, Robert J Shmookler Reis RS, Fedichev PO. Critical dynamics of gene networks is a mechanism behind ageing and gompertz law. arXiv. 2015; 1502.04307.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pyrkov, T. V., Getmantsev, E., Zhurov, B., Avchaciov, K., Pyatnitskiy, M., Menshikov, L., Khodova, K., Gudkov, A. V., & Fedichev, P. O.
Affiliations
  • Gero LLC, Moscow, 1015064, Russia
  • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (RU)
Venue
Aging
Published
2018-10-26
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
2973-2990
ISSN
1945-4589 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951064640
Cited by
55
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aging (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17228)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Keywords
biological age, frailty, locomotor activity, aging trajectories, Gompertz mortality law, mortality risk, healthspan, chronic disease incidence, hazard ratio, stages of human development
MeSH terms
Frailty, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Locomotion, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Nutrition Surveys, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Time Factors, United States, Models, Statistical, Geriatric Assessment, Frail Elderly, Risk Assessment, Young Adult, Actigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review