The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stan : A Probabilistic Programming Language
Open accessAbstract
Stan is a probabilistic programming language for specifying statistical models. A Stan program imperatively defines a log probability function over parameters conditioned on specified data and constants. As of version 2.14.0, Stan provides full Bayesian inference for continuous-variable models through Markov chain Monte Carlo methods such as the No-U-Turn sampler, an adaptive form of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling. Penalized maximum likelihood estimates are calculated using optimization methods such as the limited memory Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno algorithm. Stan is also a platform for computing log densities and their gradients and Hessians, which can be used in alternative algorithms such as variational Bayes, expectation propagation, and marginal inference using approximate integration. To this end, Stan is set up so that the densities, gradients, and Hessians, along with intermediate quantities of the algorithm such as acceptance probabilities, are easily accessible. Stan can be called from the command line using the cmdstan package, through R using the rstan package, and through Python using the pystan package. All three interfaces support sampling and optimization-based inference with diagnostics and posterior analysis. rstan and pystan also provide access to log probabilities, gradients, Hessians, parameter transforms, and specialized plotting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When dealing with more complex models that go beyond the staple analyses such as t tests, there exist a number of software packages that allow custom coding, such as JAGS (Plummer, 2003) or Stan (Carpenter et al., 2017).”
From The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis (2021) · cites this paper as Carpenter et al., 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276 · cited 8×
“This supplies fairly diffuse starting points when transformed back to the constrained scale, and thus help with convergence diagnostics as discussed in (Gelman et al. 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationInference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences
Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177011136 · Cited by 16,627 · cited 2×
“Before performing output analysis, we recommend generating multiple independent chains in order to more effectively monitor convergence; see (Gelman and Rubin 1992) for more analysis.”
MethodSelf-citationBraun, W. J., & Murdoch, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108993456.011 · Cited by 14,099
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790942 · Cited by 13,597
Self-citationNocedal, J. M., & Wright, S. J. (2006) · Springer series in operations research/Springer series in operations research and financial engineering · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-40065-5 · Cited by 10,206
WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility
Lunn, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2000) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1023/a:1008929526011 · Cited by 5,397 · cited 3×
“(Gelman et al. 2013, Section 5.1) define a hierarchical model of the incidence of tumors in rats in control groups across trials; a very similiar model is defined for mortality rates in pediatric surgeries across hospitals in (Lunn et al. 2000, 2009, Examples, Volume 1).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialJAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling
Plummer, M. (2003) · Cited by 4,720
Duane, S., Kennedy, A. D., Pendleton, B. J., & Roweth, D. (1987) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-x · Cited by 4,081
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,020
Parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification for systems biology models
Mitra, E. D., & Hlavacek, W. S. (2019) · Current Opinion in Systems Biology · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2019.10.006 · Cited by 90
“Although no biology-specific tools support AD, it is supported in the statistical modeling package Stan [31, 32], where it can be applied to ODE models.”
MethodJacobucci, R., Brandmaier, A. M., & Kievit, R. (2019) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245919826527 · Cited by 78
Seroprevalence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 IgG in Juba, South Sudan, 20201
Wiens, K. E., Mawien, P. N., Rumunu, J. P., Slater, D., Jones, F. K., Moheed, S., Caflisch, A. C., Bior, B. K., Jacob, I. A., Lako, R. L. L., et al. (2021) · Emerging infectious diseases · doi:10.3201/eid2706.210568 · Cited by 77
“org) (28) using the rstan package in R (https://cran.”
von Schmalensee, L., Gunnarsdóttir, K. H., Näslund, J., Gotthard, K., & Lehmann, P. (2021) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.13779 · Cited by 82
Ulitzsch, E., Pohl, S., Khorramdel, L., Kroehne, U., & von Davier, M. (2021) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-021-09817-7 · Cited by 78
“Bayesian estimation was conducted using Stan version 2.19 (Carpenter et al., 2017) employing the rstan package version 2.19.3 (Guo, Gabry, & Goodrich, 2018).”
InfluentialSynthesis reveals approximately balanced biotic differentiation and homogenization
Blowes, S. A., McGill, B. J., Brambilla, V., Chow, C. F. Y., Engel, T., Fontrodona‐Eslava, A., Martins, I. S., McGlinn, D. J., Moyes, F., Sagouis, A., et al. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adj9395 · Cited by 79
“…ENS , and correlations between levels of the grouping factors are estimated using the Cholesky decomposition of the correlation matrix ( R ), and assumed an LKJ prior We fit all models using the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) sampler Stan ( 40 ), and models were coded using the brms package ( 41 ).”
Hauser, A., Counotte, M. J., Margossian, C. C., Konstantinoudis, G., Low, N. N., Althaus, C. L., & Riou, J. (2020) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.03.04.20031104 · Cited by 78
“We implemented the model in a Bayesian framework using Stan [15] .”
MethodWatson, J., Taylor, W. R. J., Bancone, G., Chu, C. S., Jittamala, P., & White, N. J. (2018) · PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0006440 · Cited by 77
National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), G., Palmintier, B., USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), S. E. T. O. (.-4., Broderick, R., Mather, B., Coddington, M., Baker, K., Ding, F., Reno, M., Lave, M., et al. (2016) · doi:10.2172/1253980 · Cited by 108
Spatial correlations of ground motion for non‐ergodic seismic hazard analysis
Kuehn, N. M., & Abrahamson, N. (2019) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.3221 · Cited by 77
Somatic evolution and global expansion of an ancient transmissible cancer lineage
Baez‐Ortega, A., Gori, K. C., Strakova, A., Allen, J. L., Allum, K. M., Bansse-Issa, L., Bhutia, T. N., Bisson, J. L., Briceño, C., Domracheva, A. C., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau9923 · Cited by 80
Clayson, P. E., Baldwin, S. A., & Larson, M. J. (2021) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13762 · Cited by 84
Bayesian latent time joint mixed effect models for multicohort longitudinal data
Li, D., Iddi, S., Thompson, W. K., Donohue, M., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2017) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280217737566 · Cited by 81
IMAGINE: a comprehensive view of the interstellar medium, Galactic magnetic fields and cosmic rays
Boulanger, F., Enßlin, T. A., Fletcher, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/08/049 · Cited by 76
“In particular the IMAGINE pipeline can exploit available inference packages such as PyMC [289], PyMC 3 [290] and STAN [291].”
MethodThe impact of environmental change on the use of early pottery by East Asian hunter-gatherers
Lucquin, A., Robson, H. K., Eley, Y. L., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1803782115 · Cited by 76
Preferences and constraints: the value of economic games for studying human behaviour
Pisor, A. C., Gervais, M. M., Purzycki, B. G., & Ross, C. T. (2020) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.192090 · Cited by 82
“Analyses were coded in Stan [69] and implemented with the R statistical program (v. 3.6.0, [70]) using the RStan package (v. 2.18.2, [71]).”
InfluentialYackulic, C. B., Dodrill, M. J., Dzul, M. C., et al. (2020) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2112 · Cited by 76
Iguro, S., & Watanabe, R. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2020)006 · Cited by 76
“In this work, a Bayesian fit analysis is applied to obtain allowed ranges of the HQET parameters and |Vcb| with the use of Markov-Chain-Monte-Carlo (MCMC) method by Stan [21], a state-of-the-art platform for statistical modeling and high-performance statistical computation, implemented in MathematicaStan [39].”
InfluentialSandre, A., Banica, I., Riesel, A., Flake, J. K., Klawohn, J., & Weinberg, A. (2020) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.06.016 · Cited by 76
Dynamic social learning in temporally and spatially variable environments
Deffner, D., Kleinow, V., & McElreath, R. L. (2020) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.200734 · Cited by 78
“All models were fitted using the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo engine Stan [36] in R v. 3.6.0 [37] from Rstan v. 2.19.2 [38].”
InfluentialAI in drug development: a multidisciplinary perspective
Gallego, V., Naveiro, R., Roca, C., Insua, D. R., & Campillo, N. E. (2021) · Molecular Diversity · doi:10.1007/s11030-021-10266-8 · Cited by 85
“In particular their solution would facilitate the development of probabilistic programming languages [166, 167].”
BackgroundGonadectomy effects on the risk of immune disorders in the dog: a retrospective study
Sundburg, C. R., Belanger, J. M., Bannasch, D. L., Famula, T. R., & Oberbauer, A. M. (2016) · BMC Veterinary Research · doi:10.1186/s12917-016-0911-5 · Cited by 83
“resulting in a MCMC sample of 3000 values [39].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDrivers of biomass recovery in a secondary forested landscape of West Africa
N’Guessan, A. E., N’Dja, J. K., Yao, O. N., Amani, B. H. K., Gouli, R. G. Z., Piponiot, C., Zo‐Bi, I. C., & Hérault, B. (2018) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.11.021 · Cited by 76
Refugia under threat: Mass bleaching of coral assemblages in high‐latitude eastern Australia
Kim, S. W., Sampayo, E. M., Sommer, B., Sims, C. A., Cabrera, M. D. C. G., Dalton, S. J., Beger, M., Malcolm, H. A., Ferrari, R., Fraser, N. J., et al. (2019) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14772 · Cited by 78
Metabolic Modelling as a Framework for Metabolomics Data Integration and Analysis
Volkova, S., Matos, M. R. A., Mattanovich, M., & de Mas, I. M. (2020) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo10080303 · Cited by 77
Modernising fish and shark growth curves with Bayesian length-at-age models
Smart, J. J., & Grammer, G. L. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246734 · Cited by 75
Using digital surveillance tools for near real-time mapping of the risk of infectious disease spread
Bhatia, S., Lassmann, B., Cohn, E. L., Desai, A. N., Carrion, M. N., Kraemer, M. U. G., Herringer, M., Brownstein, J. S., Madoff, L., Cori, A., et al. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00442-3 · Cited by 78
“Model fi tting was done in a Bayesian framework using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) as implemented in the software Stan 65 and its R interface rstan 66 .”
Motor cortex stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain: results of a double-blind randomized study
Hamani, C., Fonoff, E. T., Parravano, D. C., da Silva, V. A., Galhardoni, R., de Mônaco, B. A., Navarro, J., Yeng, L. T., Teixeira, M. J., & de Andrade, D. C. (2021) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awab189 · Cited by 83
Principles of Bayesian Inference Using General Divergence Criteria
Jewson, J., Smith, J. Q., & Holmes, C. C. (2018) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e20060442 · Cited by 75
“Throughout these experiments stan (Carpenter et al., 2016) is used to produce fast and efficient samples from the general Bayesian posteriors of interest.”
MethodCarbon recovery dynamics following disturbance by selective logging in Amazonian forests
Piponiot, C., Sist, P. L. J., Mazzei, L., Peña‐Claros, M., Putz, F. E., Rutishauser, E., Shenkin, A. F., Ascarrunz, N. L., de Azevedo, C. P., Baraloto, C., et al. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.21394 · Cited by 73
“Codes were developed using the R language (RRID:SCR_ 001905) (R Developement Core Team, 2015) and the Rstan package (Carpenter et al., 2015).”
InfluentialLunnemann, P., Jensen, M. H., & Jauffred, L. (2019) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0256-3 · Cited by 74
“We use a hierarchical Bayesian inference model and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling (Carpenter et al., 2017).”
MethodBärenbold, O., Garba, A., Colley, D. G., Fleming, F. M., Haggag, A. A., Ramzy, R. M. R., Assaré, R. K., Tukahebwa, E. M., Mbonigaba, J. B., Bucumi, V., et al. (2018) · PLoS neglected tropical diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0006941 · Cited by 74
Density-dependence tips the change of plant–plant interactions under environmental stress
Zhang, R., & Tielbörger, K. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16286-6 · Cited by 75
Herrera, D., & Campos, G. D. L. (2022) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-022-07262-0 · Cited by 78
“A script that implements the above model in Stan (Carpenter et al., 2017) is available in the online code.”
MethodInfluentialMultiple Introductions of SARS-CoV-2 Alpha and Delta Variants into White-Tailed Deer in Pennsylvania
Marques, A. D., Sherrill-Mix, S. A., Everett, J. K., Adhikari, H., Reddy, S. G., Ellis, J. C., Zeliff, H., Greening, S. S., Cannuscio, C. C., Strelau, K. M., et al. (2022) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02101-22 · Cited by 74
Bayesian Methods for Calibrating Health Policy Models: A Tutorial
Menzies, N. A., Soeteman, D. I., Pandya, A., & Kim, J. J. (2017) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-017-0494-4 · Cited by 73
A tutorial on joint models of neural and behavioral measures of cognition
Palestro, J. J., Bahg, G., Sederberg, P. B., Lu, Z., Mark Steyvers, B., & Turner, B. M. (2018) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2018.03.003 · Cited by 76
“However, there are a variety of other Bayesian software packages, such as Stan (Carpenter et al., 2016), that could have been used instead.”
MethodLoomba, S., de Figueiredo, A., Piatek, S. J., de Graaf, K., & Larson, H. J. (2020) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.10.22.20217513 · Cited by 72
Benchmarking Simulation-Based InferencePreprint
Lueckmann, J.-M., Boelts, J., Greenberg, D. S., Gonçalves, P. J., & Macke, J. H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.04653 · Cited by 74
The roles of online and offline replay in planning
Eldar, E., Lièvre, G., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.56911 · Cited by 75
Antillón, M., Bilcke, J., Paltiel, A. D., & Pitzer, V. E. (2017) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.001 · Cited by 74
“We modeled each population using setting-specific transmission parameters, which we estimated by fitting the model to the adjusted age-specific incidence in each setting using a Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling algorithm (see S1 Appendix §1-3) [29].”
MethodAmmad-ud-din, M., Khan, S. A., Wennerberg, K., & Aittokallio, T. A. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx266 · Cited by 73
Haines, N., Vassileva, J., & Ahn, W. (2018) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12688 · Cited by 73
Hussein, S. (2018) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-018-0872-z · Cited by 73
“We implemented this methodology using CmdStan software (Carpenter et al. 2017; Stan Development Team 2017).”
MethodHumans treat unreliable filled-in percepts as more real than veridical ones
Ehinger, B., Häusser, K., Ossandón, J., & Peter König, B. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.21761 · Cited by 74
“An uninformative lkj-prior (n 1⁄4 2) was used for the correlation matrix, slightly emphasizing the diagonal over the off-diagonal of the correlation matrix (Sorensen et al., 2016; Carpenter et al., 2017).”
Modelling anthelmintic resistance by extending eggCounts package to allow individual efficacy
Wang, C., Torgerson, P. R., Kaplan, R. M., George, M. M., & Furrer, R. (2018) · International Journal for Parasitology Drugs and Drug Resistance · doi:10.1016/j.ijpddr.2018.07.003 · Cited by 72
Life course social connectedness: Age-cohort trends in social participation
Ang, S. (2019) · Advances in Life Course Research · doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2019.02.002 · Cited by 79
Applying the Delta Method in Metric Analytics
Deng, A., Knoblich, U., & Lu, J. (2018) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3219819.3219919 · Cited by 77
Third-party punishment by preverbal infants
Kanakogi, Y., Miyazaki, M., Takahashi, H., Yamamoto, H., Kobayashi, T., & Hiraki, K. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01354-2 · Cited by 82
Are Non-animal Systemic Safety Assessments Protective? A Toolbox and Workflow
Middleton, A., Reynolds, J., Cable, S., Baltazar, M. T., Li, H., Bevan, S. J., Carmichael, P. L., Dent, M. P., Hatherell, S., Houghton, J., et al. (2022) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfac068 · Cited by 79
“Data processing and visualization was performed using Python 3.8 with packages PyStan v2.”
MethodInfluentialPractical Hilbert space approximate Bayesian Gaussian processes for probabilistic programming
Riutort‐Mayol, G., Bürkner, P., Andersen, M. R., Solin, A., & Vehtari, A. (2022) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-022-10167-2 · Cited by 100
“Another advantage is the reduced memory requirements of automatic differentiationmethods used inmodern probabilistic programming frameworks, such as Stan (Carpenter et al. 2017) and others.”
BackgroundMethodsccomp: Robust differential composition and variability analysis for single-cell data
Mangiola, S., Roth‐Schulze, A. J., Trussart, M., Zozaya‐Valdés, E., Ma, M., Gao, Z., Rubin, A. F., Speed, T. P., Shim, H., & Papenfuss, A. T. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2203828120 · Cited by 79
Senf, C., Dirk Pflugmacher, A., Heurich, M., et al. (2017) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.020 · Cited by 72
Røgeberg, O. J. (2018) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.011 · Cited by 72
Reason, T., Benbow, E., Langham, J., Gimblett, A., Klijn, S. L., & Malcolm, B. (2024) · PharmacoEconomics - Open · doi:10.1007/s41669-024-00476-9 · Cited by 71
“Models were estimated in a Bayesian framework using Stan [20].”
MethodIncorporating Nonergodic Path Effects into the NGA‐West2 Ground‐Motion Prediction Equations
Kuehn, N. M., Abrahamson, N., & Walling, M. (2019) · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America · doi:10.1785/0120180260 · Cited by 71
Leaf trait variation in species-rich tropical Andean forests
Homeier, J., Seeler, T., Pierick, K., & Leuschner, C. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-89190-8 · Cited by 71
Measuring Attitudes toward Public Spending Using a Multivariate Tax Summary Experiment
Barnes, L., Blumenau, J., & Lauderdale, B. E. (2021) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12643 · Cited by 71
Accommodating site variation in neuroimaging data using normative and hierarchical Bayesian models
Bayer, J., Dinga, R., Kia, S. M., Kottaram, A., Wolfers, T., Lv, J., Zalesky, A., Schmaal, L., & Marquand, A. F. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119699 · Cited by 76
Rapid mapping of electrochemical processes in energy-conversion devices
Huang, J., Meisel, C., Sullivan, N. P., et al. (2024) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2024.05.003 · Cited by 71
Forecasting biodiversity in breeding birds using best practices
Harris, D. J., Taylor, S. D., & White, E. P. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.4278 · Cited by 76
A comparison of hazard perception and hazard prediction tests across China, Spain and the UK
Ventsislavova, P., Crundall, D. E., Baguley, T. S., Castro, C., Gugliotta, A., García‐Fernández, P., Zhang, W., Ba, Y., & Li, Q. (2018) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.10.010 · Cited by 73
Barberia, I., Oliva, R., Bourdin, P., & Slater, M. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203358 · Cited by 71
Garcia, C. A., Baer, S. E., Garcia, N. S., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06892-w · Cited by 71
Spectral reconstruction with deep neural networks
Kades, L., Pawlowski, J. M., Rothkopf, A., Scherzer, M., Urban, J. M., Wetzel, S. J., Wink, N., & Ziegler, F. P. G. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.096001 · Cited by 87
The latency of a visual evoked potential tracks the onset of decision making
Nunez, M. D., Gosai, A. K., Vandekerckhove, J., & Srinivasan, R. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.052 · Cited by 74
A Choice‐Based Measure of Issue Importance in the Electorate
Hanretty, C., Lauderdale, B. E., & Vivyan, N. (2020) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12470 · Cited by 70
“We estimate the conjoint response model by Bayesian posterior simulation, implemented in Stan (Carpenter et al., 2016), using uniform priors on all parameters and reporting posterior means and 95% central intervals.”
MethodSebald, J., Senf, C., Heiser, M., Scheidl, C., Dirk Pflugmacher, A., & Seidl, R. (2019) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab4937 · Cited by 72
“Joint posterior distributions were sampled using MonteCarlo-Markow-Chain (MCMC) methods implemented in the Software Stan (Carpenter et al 2017) via the rstanarm package (Stan Development Team 2016).”
MethodGurarie, E. D., Hebblewhite, M., Joly, K., Kelly, A., Adamczewski, J., Davidson, S. C., Davison, T., Gunn, A., Suitor, M. J., Fagan, W. F., et al. (2019) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.2971 · Cited by 72
“…model using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), using a Hamiltonian No-U Turn Sampler (NUTS) as implemented in the STAN programming language (Carpenter et al. 2017) via the R package rstan (Stan Development Team 2018) (complete STAN code and implementation in R are provided in Appendix S1).”
MethodDoes E-Voting matter for turnout, and to whom?
Petitpas, A., Jaquet, J. M., & Sciarini, P. (2020) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102245 · Cited by 73
The GALAH survey: multiple stars and our Galaxy
Traven, G., Feltzing, S., Merle, T., der Swaelmen, M. V., Čotar, K., Church, R. P., Zwitter, T., Ting, Y.-S., Sahlholdt, C., Asplund, M., et al. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037484 · Cited by 70
Betancourt, M. (2018) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201700214 · Cited by 70
“onte Carlo to achieve high performance in a given problem (Hoffman and Gelman, 2014) that the method really began to flourish in practice. Along with a user-friendly probabilistic programming language (Carpenter et al., 2016) and a high-performance automatic differentiation package (Carpenter et al., 2015), the No-U-Turn…”
MethodSelf-citationThe influence of 15-week exercise training on dietary patterns among young adults
Joo, J., Williamson, S. A., Vazquez, A. I., Fernández, J. R., & Bray, M. S. (2019) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/s41366-018-0299-3 · Cited by 72
Evaluating Probabilistic Forecasts with scoringRulesPreprint
Jordan, A. I., Krüger, F., & Lerch, S. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.04743 · Cited by 70
“MCMC methods are popular across the disciplines, and many sophisticated R implementations are available (e.g., Kastner 2016; Carpenter et al. 2017).”
MethodFlaxman, S. R., Mishra, S., Gandy, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.11342 · Cited by 70
“Fitting was done in the probabilistic programming language Stan[1] using an adaptive Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) sampler.”
MethodWhat Kind of Language Is Hard to Language-Model?
Mielke, S. J., Cotterell, R., Gorman, K., Roark, B., & Eisner, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1491 · Cited by 18
“Figure 6 shows the log-probability of held-out data under the regression model, by fixing the estimated difficulties d j (and sometimes also the estimated variance σ 2 ) to their values obtained from training data, and then finding either MAP estimates or posterior means (by running HMC using STAN) of 29 However, version…”
MethodInfluentialBroken into Pieces: ATLAS and Aliqa Uma as One Single Stream
Li, T. S., Koposov, S. E., Erkal, D., Ji, A., Shipp, N., Pace, A., Hilmi, T., Kuehn, K., Lewis, G., Mackey, D., et al. (2020) · Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abeb18 · Cited by 57
“Software: numpy (van der Walt et al. 2011), scipy (Jones et al. 2001), matplotlib (Hunter 2007), astropy (Astropy Collaboration et al. 2013; Price-Whelan et al. 2018), emcee (Foreman-Mackey et al. 2013), CarPy (Kelson 2003), MOOG (Sneden 1973; Sobeck et al. 2011), smhr (Casey 2014), q3c (Koposov & Bartunov 2006), RVSp…”
MethodGreen, B., & Chen, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3479562 · Cited by 69
“ions were almost identical). We implemented models with the brms package in R (16), which provides a high-level interface to Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling for Bayesian inference using Stan (17). In both settings we regressed the average prediction about each subject (both with and without the risk assessmen…”
MethodSupply chain mapping: a proposed construct
Mubarik, M. S., Kusi‐Sarpong, S., Govindan, K., Khan, S. A., & Oyedijo, A. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2021.1944390 · Cited by 70
Action video game play facilitates “learning to learn”
Zhang, R., Chopin, A., Shibata, K., Lu, Z., Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02652-7 · Cited by 76
Chou, W., Cheng, Y., Riviere, J. E., Monteiro-Riviere, N. A., Kreyling, W. G., & Lin, Z. (2022) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s12989-022-00489-4 · Cited by 71
Bushell, F. M. L., Tonner, P. D., Jabbari, S., Schmid, A., & Lund, P. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.03196 · Cited by 69
“Model Implementation phenom is implemented using the STAN library, which provides efficient Hamiltonian Monte-Carlo sampling of the model posterior (Carpenter et al., 2017).”
MethodZhao, Q., Arnold, T. W., Devries, J. H., Howerter, D. W., Clark, R. G., & Weegman, M. D. (2019) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13043 · Cited by 68
“We implemented the IPM in a hierarchical Bayesian framework using the software stan 2.17.3 (Carpenter et al., 2017), which is called from Program r 3.5.0 (R Development Core Team 2013) through r package “rstan” (Stan Development Team, 2014).”
MethodInfluentialThe Neural Basis of Approach-Avoidance Conflict: A Model Based Analysis
Zorowitz, S., Rockhill, A. P., Ellard, K. K., Link, K. E., Herrington, T. M., Pizzagalli, D. A., Widge, A. S., Deckersbach, T., & Dougherty, D. D. (2019) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0115-19.2019 · Cited by 67
“15 (Carpenter et al., 2017) with four chains of 2000 steps each (1000 burn-in, thinning 4), yielding 1000 posterior samples total.”
BackgroundChou, W., & Lin, Z. (2020) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105581 · Cited by 69
Haq, M. T., Zlatkovic, M., & Ksaibati, K. (2020) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105654 · Cited by 68
Model-based evaluation of school- and non-school-related measures to control the COVID-19 pandemic
Rozhnova, G., van Dorp, C. H., Bruijning-Verhagen, P. C. J. L., Bootsma, M., van de Wijgert, J. H. H. M., Bonten, M. J. M., & Kretzschmar, M. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21899-6 · Cited by 71
Caicedo, E.-Y., Charniga, K., Rueda-Monsalbe, A., Dorigatti, I., Méndez, Y. R., Hamlet, A., Carrera, J., & Cucunubá, Z. M. (2021) · PLoS neglected tropical diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0009418 · Cited by 68
“We run 10,000 iterations with 5,000 burn-in and 138 selected the models after convergence and based on the expected log predictive density for an 139 out-of-sample data point (elpd) [29, 30].”
MethodBroderick, A. E., Pesce, D. W., Gold, R., Tiede, P., Pu, H.-Y., Anantua, R., Britzen, S., Ceccobello, C., Chatterjee, K., Cheng, X., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c1d · Cited by 69
“In summary, the improved sampler makes use of a deterministic even-odd swap tempering scheme (Syed et al. 2019) using the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling kernel from the Stan package (Carpenter et al. 2017).”
MethodA resource-rational model of human processing of recursive linguistic structure
Hahn, M., Futrell, R., Lévy, R., & Gibson, E. A. F. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2122602119 · Cited by 80
Linking changes in species composition and biomass in a globally distributed grassland experiment
Ladouceur, E. R., Blowes, S. A., Chase, J. M., Clark, A. T., Garbowski, M., Alberti, J., Arnillas, C. A., Bakker, J. D., Barrio, I. C., Bharath, S., et al. (2022) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.14126 · Cited by 68
“For Bayesian inferences and estimates of uncertainty, all models described above were fitted using the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) sampler Stan (Carpenter et al., 2017) and coded using the ‘brms’ package (Bürkner, 2018) in the R for Statistical Computing and Graphics environment (v.4.0.2; (R Core Development Team, 2…”
InfluentialFast Bayesian Inference of Reparameterized Gamma Process With Random Effects
Zhou, S., Xu, A., Tang, Y., et al. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Reliability · doi:10.1109/tr.2023.3263940 · Cited by 68
“Although Stan [52] integrates the VB algorithm for engineering applications, it directly approximates the model parameters of immediate interest with a multivariate normal distribution.”
MethodHigh-Dimensional Bayesian Geostatistics
Banerjee, S. (2017) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/17-ba1056r · Cited by 67
Neural mechanisms underlying the effects of physical fatigue on effort-based choice
Hogan, P. S., Chen, S., Teh, W. W., & Chib, V. S. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17855-5 · Cited by 83
A synthesis of land use impacts on stream biodiversity across metrics and scales
Petsch, D. K., Blowes, S. A., MELO, A. S., & Chase, J. M. (2021) · Ecology · doi:10.1002/ecy.3498 · Cited by 69
AI makes you smarter but none the wiser: The disconnect between performance and metacognition
Fernandes, D., Villa, S., Nicholls, S., Haavisto, O., Buschek, D., Schmidt, A., Kosch, T., Shen, C., & Welsch, R. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108779 · Cited by 144
Temporal probabilistic modeling of bacterial compositions derived from 16S rRNA sequencing
Äijö, T., Müller, C. L., & Bonneau, R. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx549 · Cited by 64
“In light of these limitations, several methodologies have been proposed for simultaneous modeling of taxa through their relative abundances, such as the Dirichlet-multinomial (DM) (Holmes 2012; Chen and Li, 2013) and logistic normal multinomial models (Xia 2013).”
MethodContinuous Monitoring of A/B Tests without Pain: Optional Stopping in Bayesian Testing
Deng, A., Lu, J., & Chen, S. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa.2016.33 · Cited by 67
Bat genomes illuminate adaptations to viral tolerance and disease resistance
Morales, A. E., Dong, Y., Brown, T., Baid, K., Kontopoulos, D. G., Gonzalez, V., Huang, Z., Ahmed, A.-W., Bhuinya, A., Hilgers, L., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08471-0 · Cited by 78
Puonti, O., Saturnino, G. B., Madsen, K. H., & Thielscher, A. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116431 · Cited by 66
“The Stan code for running the analysis is provided in Supplementary Material 1.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., Brubaker, M., Guo, J., Li, P., & Riddell, A.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Adobe Systems (United States) (US)
- York University (CA)
- Indiana University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Statistical Software
- Publisher
- Foundation for Open Access Statistic
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-32
- ISSN
- 1548-7660 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9788645
- OpenAlex
- W2577537660
- Semantic Scholar
- f8110d834fcc9a3a1c4416d4b165984219fe26f4
- Cited by
- 7,754
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 672 · 2025: 811 · 2024: 811 · 2023: 835 · 2022: 917 · 2021: 1127 · 2020: 970 · 2019: 752 · 2018: 516 · 2017: 253
- FWCI
- 474.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Statistical Software (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Journal of Systems and Software
- Grantee Submission
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0934516, 1205516)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0002099)
- Harvard University
- National Institutes of Health (1g20rr030893-01)
- Institute of Education Sciences (R305D090006-09A, R305D090006)
- National Center for Research Resources (G20RR030893)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Data Analysis with R
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- Stan, probabilistic programming languages, Bayesian inference, Markov chain Monte Carlo, No-U-Turn Sampler, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, L-BFGS optimization, penalized likelihood, variational inference, expectation propagation, marginal inference, R interface, Python interface, posterior analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review