Cited by 8Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsSpeech and dialogue systemsTopic Modeling

Multimodal Multi-Speaker Merger & Acquisition Financial Modeling: A New Task, Dataset, and Neural Baselines

Open access
Sawhney, Ramit, Goyal, Mihir, Goel, Prakhar, Mathur, Puneet, Shah, Rajiv Ratn·2021·Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Abstract

Ramit Sawhney, Mihir Goyal, Prakhar Goel, Puneet Mathur, Rajiv Ratn Shah. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.526

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recently, Transformer based alignment has led to a surge of leveraging large quantities of web data for vision and language tasks.

    “Recently, Transformer based alignment [9], [119], [260], [261], [262] has led to a surge of leveraging large quantities of web data (e.g., image-text pairs) for vision and language tasks.”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [260]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Tim Bollerslev. 1986. Generalized autoregressive con- ditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Economet- rics, 52:5-59.
  2. Sudipto Dasgupta, Jarrad Harford, Fangyuan Ma, Daisy Wang, and Haojun Xie. 2020. Mergers un- der the microscope: Analysing conference call tran- scripts. Available at SSRN 3528016.
  3. R. Fraunhoffer, H. Kim, and D. Schiereck. 2018. Value creation in ma transactions, conference calls, and shareholder protection. International Journal of Fi- nancial Studies, 6:1-21.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sawhney, R., Goyal, M., Goel, P., Mathur, P., & Shah, R. R.
Affiliations
Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi (IN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Published
2021
Pages
6751-6762
OpenAlex
W3176431316
Cited by
8
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.57
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
mergers and acquisitions, financial modeling, multi-speaker speech, financial statement analysis, speech-to-text, dataset construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review