Cited by 33Ethics and Social Impacts of AIMental Health Treatment and AccessLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

Gendered Mental Health Stigma in Masked Language Models

Open access
Lin, Inna, Njoo, Lucille, Field, Anjalie, Sharma, Ashish, Reinecke, Katharina, Althoff, Tim, Tsvetkov, Yulia·2022·Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

Abstract

Mental health stigma prevents many individuals from receiving the appropriate care, and social psychology studies have shown that mental health tends to be overlooked in men.In this work, we investigate gendered mental health stigma in masked language models.In doing so, we operationalize mental health stigma by developing a framework grounded in psychology research: we use clinical psychology literature to curate prompts, then evaluate the models' propensity to generate gendered words.We find that masked language models capture societal stigma about gender in mental health: models are consistently more likely to predict female subjects than male in sentences about having a mental health condition (32% vs. 19%), and this disparity is exacerbated for sentences that indicate treatment-seeking behavior.Furthermore, we find that different models capture dimensions of stigma differently for men and women, associating stereotypes like anger, blame, and pity more with women with mental health conditions than with men.In showing the complex nuances of models' gendered mental health stigma, we demonstrate that context and overlapping dimensions of identity are important considerations when assessing computational models' social biases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.139

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Patricia Hill Collins and Sirma Bilge. 2020. Intersec- tionality. John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Patrick Corrigan and Amy Watson. 2002. The impact of stigma on people with mental illness. World psy- chiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 1:16-20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, I., Njoo, L., Field, A., Sharma, A., Reinecke, K., Althoff, T., & Tsvetkov, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Published
2022
Pages
2152-2170
OpenAlex
W4385572715
Cited by
33
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9
FWCI
4.47
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2142794, 2040926, 2006104, 2142739, 2025022, CAREER, 1901386)
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-004841)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • University of Washington
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Office of Naval Research (#N00014-21-1-2154, N00014)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH125179)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
mental health stigma, gender bias, masked language models, gender stereotypes, treatment-seeking behavior, gendered language, clinical psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review