The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analyzing Polarization in Social Media: Method and Application to Tweets on 21 Mass Shootings
Open accessAbstract
Dorottya Demszky, Nikhil Garg, Rob Voigt, James Zou, Jesse Shapiro, Matthew Gentzkow, Dan Jurafsky. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers). 2019.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071 · cited 2×
“Train GloVe embeddings (Pennington et al., 2014) on V based on 11-50k random samples of tweets from each event.”
BackgroundMethodAustin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
Critical race theory: an introduction
Delgado, R., Stefancic, J., & Harris, A. (2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-2938 · Cited by 5,992
Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160 · Cited by 3,245 · cited 3×
“com/ddemszky/framing-twitter 2016) and Facebook (Bakshy et al., 2015).”
BackgroundIyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038 · Cited by 2,996 · cited 1×
“, 2009), and so emotional expression represents another semantic layer relevant to polarization (Iyengar et al., 2012; Suhay, 2015).”
Background(2009) · Cited by 1,900
Political Polarization in the American Public
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836 · Cited by 1,798 · cited 1×
“, forthcoming), and the propagation of partisan frames can influence public opinion (Chong and Druckman, 2007) and party identification (Fiorina and Abrams, 2008).”
BackgroundFraming Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power
Entman, R. M. (2007) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x · Cited by 1,781 · cited 1×
“The strategy of highlighting particular aspects within topics as a means of framing (Entman, 2007) has also been quantified in the NLP literature (Boydstun et al.”
BackgroundPolitical Polarization on Twitter
Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Goncalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2011) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4589064 · Cited by 1,254
A biterm topic model for short texts
Yan, X., Guo, J., Lan, Y., & Cheng, X. (2013) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2488388.2488514 · Cited by 1,165 · cited 3×
“We build on the ability of vector space models to represent higher-level semantics to develop our own embedding-based topic assignment approach, comparing it with two traditional LDAbased methods: MALLET8 and the Biterm Topic Model (BTM) (Yan et al., 2013); BTM was developed specifically for tweets.”
MethodInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Analyzing Polarization in Social Media: Method and Application to Tweets on 21 Mass Shootings https://aclanthology.org/N19-1304/ (Demszky et al., NAACL 2019)
- Analyzing Polarization in Social Media: Method and Application to Tweets on 21 Mass Shootings (Demszky et al., NAACL 2019)
- ACL materials are Copyright © 1963–2026 ACL; other materials are copyrighted by their respective copyright holders. Materials prior to 2016 here are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 International License. Permission is granted to make copies for the purposes of teaching and research. Materials published in or after 2016 are licensed on a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science?
Ziems, C., Held, W., Shaikh, O., Chen, J., Zhang, Z., & Yang, D. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00502 · Cited by 585
“We evaluate on the Indian English dialect feature detection task of Demszky et al. (2019) because this is one of the only available datasets to be handlabeled by a domain expert.”
BackgroundMethodGenerative Adversarial Networks for face generation: A survey
Kammoun, A., Slama, R., Tabia, H., Ouni, T., & Abid, M. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1122445.1122456 · Cited by 370
Stance detection on social media: State of the art and trends
Aldayel, A., & Magdy, W. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102597 · Cited by 290
“The work of [Demszky et al. 2019] analyzed the attitudes about 21 mass shooting event.”
BackgroundMethodResultFeng, S., Park, C. Y., Liu, Y., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.656 · Cited by 149
Emotion and Reason in Political Language
Gennaro, G., & Ash, E. (2021) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/ueab104 · Cited by 134
A Survey of Race, Racism, and Anti-Racism in NLP
Field, A., Blodgett, S. L., Talat, Z., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.149 · Cited by 115
Brüggemann, M., & Meyer, H. (2023) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtad012 · Cited by 60
Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Abusive Language Online
(2019) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-35 · Cited by 52
Shen, Q., & Rosé, C. P. (2019) · Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3507 · Cited by 50
“Topic choice has been commonly used in NLP (Tsur et al., 2015; Field et al., 2018; Demszky et al., 2019) as a proxy for agenda-setting , the strategic highlighting of what aspects of a subject are worth discussing (McCombs, 2002).”
The Kids Are Online: Teen Social Media Use, Civic Engagement, and Affective Polarization
Oden, A., & Porter, L. (2023) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051231186364 · Cited by 71
“The internet has often been accused of increasing political polarization among highly active users online (Demszky et al., 2019; Iandoli et al., 2021; Kubin & von Sikorski, 2021; Yarchi et al., 2021).”
BackgroundRöttger, P., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.206 · Cited by 65
“For finetuning on labelled data, we trained for three epochs with a batch size of 32, which corresponds to default settings recommended by Devlin et al. (2019).”
MethodInfluentialHua, Y., Jiang, H., Lin, S., Yang, J., Plasek, J. M., Bates, D. W., & Zhou, L. Q. (2022) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac114 · Cited by 45
“In short, we calculated and visualized statewide average stance per drug per wave for geoinfer-ence; We follow Demszky et al 34 to infer political affiliation and Li et al 35 to infer healthcare background.”
MethodWeakly Supervised Learning of Nuanced Frames for Analyzing Polarization in News Media
Roy, S., & Goldwasser, D. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.620 · Cited by 49
“…as a middle ground between event-specific frames, emerging from the data and capturing properties unique to the given topic (Tsur et al., 2015; Demszky et al., 2019), and general issue frames (Boydstun et al., 2014; Card et al., 2015b; Johnson et al., 2017a; Field et al., 2018; Hartmann et…”
BackgroundMethodResultAffective Polarization in Online Climate Change Discourse on Twitter
Tyagi, A., Uyheng, J., & Carley, K. M. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1109/asonam49781.2020.9381419 · Cited by 41
Feminism, gender identity and polarization in TikTok and Twitter
Peña-Fernández, S., Ureta, A. L., & Morales-i-Gras, J. (2023) · Comunicar · doi:10.3916/c75-2023-04 · Cited by 41
“…understand positions or discourses of hate based on dialectic confrontations, which currently represent a sphere which has still not been explored to any great extent in the literature focused on expressions of the identity of the young population in connection with gender in digital environments.”
We Don't Speak the Same Language: Interpreting Polarization through Machine Translation
KhudaBukhsh, A. R., Sarkar, R., Kamlet, M. S., & Mitchell, T. M. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i17.17748 · Cited by 42
“Unlike [12] that focused on a specific type of events (mass-shootings) and [15] that studied controversy surrounding the most-recent supreme court confirmation, we consider a longer, continuous time-horizon (2017 - 2020) within which two (or more) sub-communities discuss a broad range of issues.”
Handbook of Computational Social Science for Policy
Bertoni, E., Fontana, M., Gabrielli, L., Signorelli, S., & Vespe, M. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16624-2 · Cited by 47
“…et al., 2020), ideology (Hirst et al., 2010; Iyyer et al., 2014; Preoţiuc-Pietro et al., 2017), and reasoning on certain topics (Egami et al., 2018; Demszky et al., 2019; Camp et al., 2021), to factual information, such as main topics (Gottipati et al., 2013), events (Trappl, 2006; Mitamura et…”
BackgroundMobilize for Our Lives? School Shootings and Democratic Accountability in U.S. Elections
Hassell, H. J. G., Holbein, J. B., & BALDWIN, M. (2020) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055420000635 · Cited by 34
“Increased protests that resulted after the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in early 2018, along with evidence from increases in online discussions that follow school shootings (Demszky et al. 2019), suggests these eventsmay activate the knowledge, skills, and behaviors likely to promote voting.”
BackgroundNémeth, R. (2022) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-022-00196-2 · Cited by 49
“1 3 of the crisis, there were quite a few [5, 96] that argued that the meeting of computer science and applied sciences is more than just adapting large data repositories and tools to analyze them.”
BackgroundPark, C. Y., Mendelsohn, J., Field, A., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.382 · Cited by 66
“While less-supervised approaches exist, they often use word statistics or hierarchical topic models, which lead to the same interpretability, stability, and simplification concerns as in §3.1 (Nguyen et al., 2013; Roberts et al., 2016; Demszky et al., 2019; Bhatia et al., 2021).”
BackgroundInfluentialPolitical Bias and Factualness in News Sharing across more than 100,000 Online Communities
Weld, G., Glenski, M., & Althoff, T. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18104 · Cited by 36
“Many papers have recently been published on detecting political bias of online content either automatically (Baly et al. 2020; Demszky et al. 2019) or manually (Ganguly et al. 2020; Bozarth, Saraf, and Budak 2020).”
BackgroundIdentifying Morality Frames in Political Tweets using Relational Learning
Roy, S., Pacheco, M. L., & Goldwasser, D. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.783 · Cited by 24
“Framing is used to study the political bias and polarization in social and news media (Tsur et al., 2015; Baumer et al., 2015; Card et al., 2015; Field et al., 2018; Demszky et al., 2019; Fan et al., 2019; Roy and Goldwasser, 2020).”
MethodHarnessing Code Switching to Transcend the Linguistic Barrier
KhudaBukhsh, A. R., Palakodety, S., & Carbonell, J. (2020) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2020/602 · Cited by 22
Roy, S., & Goldwasser, D. (2021) · International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media (SocialNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.socialnlp-1.1 · Cited by 25
“Several works have looked at analyzing political ideologies, beyond the left and right divide, using text (Sim et al., 2013; Preo¸tiuc-Pietro et al., 2017), and specifically using Twitter data (Conover et al., 2011; Johnson and Goldwasser, 2016; Mohammad et al., 2016; Demszky et al., 2019).”
BackgroundFringe News Networks: Dynamics of US News Viewership following the 2020 Presidential Election
KhudaBukhsh, A. R., Sarkar, R., Kamlet, M. S., & Mitchell, T. M. (2022) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/3501247.3531577 · Cited by 23
“The growing political polarization of the American electorate over the last several decades has been widely studied and documented [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8].”
BackgroundThe effect of political polarization on social distance stances in the Brazilian COVID-19 scenario
Ebeling, R., Sáenz, C. A. C., Nobre, J. C., & Becker, K. E. (2021) · Journal of Information and Data Management · doi:10.5753/jidm.2021.1889 · Cited by 23
“LIWC has been deployed to characterize psychological aspects related to political partisanship, such as affect states and pronouns in stances regarding mass shootings [Demszky et al. 2019], honesty and cognitive complexity in USA presidency candidates [Slatcher et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTyagi, A., Uyheng, J., & Carley, K. M. (2021) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-021-00792-6 · Cited by 27
“Given various conceptualizations of polarization, different frameworks have been developed to quantify pathological patterns of communication across groups holding similar or opposed stances on a given issue (Darwish 2019; Demszky et al. 2019; Morales et al. 2015; Weber et al. 2013).”
BackgroundPolarization of Opinions on COVID-19 Measures: Integrating Twitter and Survey Data
Reiter-Haas, M., Klösch, B., Hadler, M., & Lex, E. (2022) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393221087662 · Cited by 23
Measuring Forecasting Skill from Text
Zong, S., Ritter, A., & Hovy, E. H. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.473 · Cited by 20
“Demszky et al. (2019) analyzed political polarization in social media and Voigt et al. (2017) examined the connections be-tween police officers’ politeness and race by analyzing language.”
BackgroundSeparating Polarization from Noise: Comparison and Normalization of Structural Polarization Measures
Salloum, A., Chen, T. H. Y., & Kivelä, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3512962 · Cited by 20
“This body of work ranges from studies exploring the role of polarization in social media [11, 14, 15, 18, 20, 64, 66] to platform design aimed at attenuating polarization [5, 60, 61].”
BackgroundNatural Language Processing for Policymaking
Jin, Z., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16624-2_7 · Cited by 27
A Computational Analysis of Polarization on Indian and Pakistani Social Media
Tyagi, A., Field, A., Lathwal, P., Tsvetkov, Y., & Carley, K. M. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60975-7_27 · Cited by 20
“While social media platforms foster open communication and have the potential to offer more democratic information systems, they have simultaneously facilitated divisions in society by allowing the spread of polarizing and incendiary content [23,54].”
BackgroundYoung users of social media: an analysis from a gender perspective
Aran-Ramspott, S., Korres, O., Albizuri, I. E., Inchaurtieta, Á. M., & Bergillos, I. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1375983 · Cited by 32
Framing Social Movements on Social Media
Mendelsohn, J., Vijan, M., Card, D., & Budak, C. (2024) · Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media · doi:10.51685/jqd.2024.icwsm.9 · Cited by 28
Multi-VALUE: A Framework for Cross-Dialectal English NLP
Ziems, C., Held, W., Yang, J., Dhamala, J., Gupta, R., & Yang, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.44 · Cited by 29
Boehme, H. M., Kaminski, R. J., & Nolan, M. S. (2022) · Urban Science · doi:10.3390/urbansci6010016 · Cited by 16
Weerasooriya, T. C., Dutta, S., Ranasinghe, T., Zampieri, M., Homan, C. M., & KhudaBukhsh, A. R. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.713 · Cited by 27
Dutta, S., Li, B., Nagin, D. S., & KhudaBukhsh, A. R. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2022/702 · Cited by 18
“Demszky et al. [2019] provide an NLP framework to quantify and analyze political polarization in 4.4M tweets on 21 mass shooting events.”
BackgroundInfluentialBeel, J., Xiang, T., Soni, S., & Yang, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19270 · Cited by 18
“Similarly, Demszky et al. (2019) measured polarization based on the content of tweets around issues of gun policies for a series of documented mass shooting events.”
BackgroundThe Reddit Politosphere: A Large-Scale Text and Network Resource of Online Political Discourse
Hofmann, V., Schütze, H., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19377 · Cited by 15
“…et al. 2015; Garimella et al. 2018; Morales et al. 2019), ideological radicalization (Grover and Mark 2019; Crawford, Keen, and Suarez-Tangil 2021; Mamié, Ribeiro, and West 2021), and political framing (Demszky et al. 2019; Mendelsohn, Budak, and Jurgens 2021; Reiter-Haas, Kopeinik, and Lex 2021).”
BackgroundInfluentialEvolving linguistic divergence on polarizing social media
Karjus, A., & Cuskley, C. F. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02922-9 · Cited by 18
“…Muise et al. 2022), polarization and segregation effects have been observed in diverging public narratives about society and signi fi cant events (Demszky et al. 2019; Li et al. 2017), online knowledge curation (Yang and Colavizza 2022), as well as behavior on social media (Adamic and Glance…”
Detection of dangerous events on social media: a critical review
Jamil, M. L., Pais, S., & Cordeiro, J. (2022) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-022-00980-y · Cited by 17
“Demszky et al. (2019) highlight four linguistic dimensions of political polarization in social media: topic choice, framing, and affect an apparent force.”
BackgroundMining Insights from Large-Scale Corpora Using Fine-Tuned Language Models
Palakodety, S., KhudaBukhsh, A. R., & Carbonell, J. (2020) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia200306 · Cited by 16
“Analysis of religious polarization in our corpus (along the lines of political polarization in [13]) would require a reliable estimate of religious af-filiation.”
BackgroundThe Non-native Speaker Aspect: Indian English in Social Media
Sarkar, R., Mahinder, S., & KhudaBukhsh, A. R. (2020) · Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.wnut-1.9 · Cited by 14
“From policy debates (Demszky et al., 2019) to modern conflicts (Palakodety et al.”
BackgroundEngaging Politically Diverse Audiences on Social Media
Saveski, M., Beeferman, D., McClure, D., & Roy, D. K. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19342 · Cited by 15
“Prior work has investigated the linguistic variation across different online communities, including linguistic differences between Republicans and Democrats (Demszky et al. 2019), politically homogeneous vs. heterogeneous groups (An et al. 2019), and overall stylistic variation among different communities on different…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialModeling Language Usage and Listener Engagement in Podcasts
Reddy, S., Lazarova, M., Yu, Y., & Jones, R. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.52 · Cited by 16
“6We experimented with the method of Demszky et al. (2019) to expand the lexicon for the domain by training GloVe embeddings on the dataset, and then for each emotion, retrieving the words that have the highest mean cosine similarity to the words associated with that emotion.”
MethodUsers’ polarisation in dynamic discussion networks: The case of refugee crisis in Sweden
Kopacheva, E., & Yantseva, V. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262992 · Cited by 18
To Protect and To Serve? Analyzing Entity-Centric Framing of Police Violence
Ziems, C., & Yang, D. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.82 · Cited by 13
“A large body of related work in NLP focuses on detecting stance, ideology, or political leaning (Baly et al., 2020; Bamman and Smith, 2015; Iyyer et al., 2014; Johnson et al., 2017; Preoţiuc-Pietro et al., 2017; Luo et al., 2020a; Stefanov et al., 2020).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDurrheim, K. L., & Quayle, M. (2025) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2025.2499332 · Cited by 19
Ebeling, R., Sáenz, C. A. C., Nobre, J. C., et al. (2020) · doi:10.5753/kdmile.2020.11963 · Cited by 11
Ravi, K., & Yuan, J.-S. (2024) · Intelligent Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.iswa.2024.200456 · Cited by 13
Heterogeneous Supervised Topic Models
Sridhar, D., Daumé, H., & Blei, D. M. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00487 · Cited by 9
Online polarization and cross-fertilization in multi-cleavage societies: the case of Spain
Rodríguez-Casañ, R., García-Vidal, E., Grimaldi, D., Carrasco-Farré, C., Vaquer-Estalrich, F., & Vila‐Francés, J. (2022) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-022-00909-5 · Cited by 11
“There is extant discussion about the role of social media companies in fostering political polarization and how they should be regulated to avoid incentivizing extreme positions (Anderson and Huntington 2017; Demszky et al. 2019).”
BackgroundA Multi-Dimensional Framework to Analyze Group Behavior Based on Political Polarization
Ebeling, R., Nobre, J. C., & Becker, K. E. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120768 · Cited by 10
Automatically Inferring Gender Associations from Language
Chang, S. Y., & McKeown, K. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1579 · Cited by 11
“Clustering word embeddings has proven useful for discovering salient patterns in text corpora (Wilson et al., 2018; Demszky et al., 2019).”
BackgroundWhat Sounds “Right” to Me? Experiential Factors in the Perception of Political Ideology
Shen, Q., & Rosé, C. P. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.152 · Cited by 10
“, 2017) as a starting heuristic, or evaluating a labeling approach by comparing geolocation tags attached to posts with historical voting patterns (Demszky et al., 2019).”
BackgroundEbeling, R., Sáenz, C. A. C., Nobre, J. C., & Becker, K. E. (2020) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT) · doi:10.1109/wiiat50758.2020.00031 · Cited by 11
“The expression of emotional states constitutes a semantic level relevant to polarization and can assist in detecting ideological levels [6].”
BackgroundInfluentialHofmann, V., Dong, X., Pierrehumbert, J. B., & Schuetze, H. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.41 · Cited by 11
“In NLP, a growing body of work has discovered mechanisms by which polarization manifests itself linguistically (e.g., Demszky et al., 2019).”
BackgroundResultStudying Unemployment Effects on Mental Health: Social Media versus the Traditional Approach
Ahmed, S., Rajput, A., Sarirete, A., Aljaberi, A., Alghanem, O., & Alsheraigi, A. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12198130 · Cited by 8
“, in [17], employ NLP techniques to uncover linguistic dimensions of political polarization.”
MethodIdentity Construction in a Misogynist Incels Forum
Yoder, M. M., Perry, C., Brown, D. W., Carley, K. M., & Pruden, M. L. (2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.woah-1.1 · Cited by 8
Multi-Target Stance Detection with Multi-Task Learning
Chen, C., Xi, W., & Zhou, B. (2020) · International Conference on Computing and Pattern Recognition (ICCPR) · doi:10.1145/3436369.3436473 · Cited by 7
“On the other hand, stance detection has been used to analyze the attitude related to disruptive events, such as mass shooting event[5].”
Understanding Politics via Contextualized Discourse Processing
Pujari, R., & Goldwasser, D. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.102 · Cited by 9
“Of late, several works attempted to solve such tasks (Iyyer et al., 2016; Han et al., 2019; Demszky et al., 2019; Kulkarni et al., 2018; PreoţiucPietro et al., 2017; Diermeier et al., 2012).”
BackgroundJarynowski, A. K., Semenov, A., Wójta-Kempa, M., & Belik, V. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91434-9_31 · Cited by 7
Tribe or Not? Critical Inspection of Group Differences Using TribalGram
Ahn, Y., Yan, M., Lin, Y., Chung, W., & Hwa, R. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3484509 · Cited by 7
Quantitative Modeling and Analysis of Argumentation Polarization in Cyber Argumentation
Sirrianni, J., Liu, X., & Adams, D. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2020.3035228 · Cited by 7
“Much attention has been paid to opinion polarization in online settings, such as social media [9], [23], [26]–[30], among political blogs [31], [32], and in comment sections [15].”
BackgroundUnpacking media bias in the growing divide between cable and network news
Hosseinmardi, H., Wolken, S., Rothschild, D. M., & Watts, D. J. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-01046-7 · Cited by 10
Regrexit or not Regrexit: Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis in Polarized Contexts
Vorakitphan, V., Guerini, M., Cabrio, E., et al. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.19 · Cited by 6
“Demszky et al. (2019) apply ABSA methods to pioneer tweets on the US mass shootings topic, where the topic was politically discussed from different viewpoints according to the locations of events with the contrasting use of the terms “terrorist” and “crazy”, that contribute to polarization.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAligning Multidimensional Worldviews and Discovering Ideological Differences
Milbauer, J., Mathew, A., & Evans, J. A. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.396 · Cited by 8
“In order to identify topic areas within which to measure misalignment, we implement a topic assignment procedure, inspired by the success of a simple embedding-based approach for Twitter data in Demszky et al. (2019).”
MethodIdentifying and Characterizing New Expressions of Community Framing during Polarization
Sarmiento, H., Bravo-Márquez, F., Graells-Garrido, E., & Poblete, B. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19339 · Cited by 5
“Prior research in the area has found that online groups can tend to develop their own discourses and vocabulary around certain topics or events (Darwish et al. 2018; Demszky et al. 2019; Graells-Garrido, Baeza-Yates, and Lalmas 2020; Li, Porco, and Goldwasser 2018; Stefanov et al. 2020).”
BackgroundInteractive Concept Learning for Uncovering Latent Themes in Large Text Collections
Pacheco, M. L., Islam, T., Ungar, L., Yin, M., & Goldwasser, D. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.313 · Cited by 6
“, 2021), or by using data-driven methods (Demszky et al., 2019; Roy and Goldwasser, 2021).”
BackgroundMethodZhao, W., Walasek, L., & Brown, G. D. A. (2023) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/2023/9094933 · Cited by 8
“discussions of long-discussed and highly politicized topics such as gun control [25] and presidential elections [26].”
BackgroundEmotion and Reason in Political Language
Gennaro, G., & Ash, E. (2021) · Economic Journal · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000468192 · Cited by 91
“For this purpose, we construct positive and negative sentiment dimensions in our embedding space using our centroid method, with positive and negative seed lexicons taken from Demszky et al. (2019) (see Appendix A.4 for details).”
MethodA Framework for the Unsupervised Modeling and Extraction of Polarization Knowledge from News Media
Paschalides, D., Pallis, G., & Dikaiakos, M. D. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Social Computing · doi:10.1145/3703594 · Cited by 8
“These groups can be either pre-defined , through the use of manual labeling [2, 3, 5, 33, 40, 53, 65] or automated labeling [24, 32, 84], or partitioned using unsupervised methods such as community detection [22, 31, 37, 54, 63].”
InfluentialDetecting Polarized Topics Using Partisanship-aware Contextualized Topic Embeddings
He, Z., Mokhberian, N., Câmara, A., Abeliuk, A., & Lerman, K. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.181 · Cited by 10
“Different from (Demszky et al., 2019) that assigns only one topic with the highest probability to a document, we allow a document to be assigned multiple topics with different probabilities.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDocSCAN: Unsupervised Text Classification via Learning from Neighbors
Stammbach, D., & Ash, E. (2021) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000484681 · Cited by 15
Pacchioni-Hurtado, V., & Antezana, M. (2023) · Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación · doi:10.18682/cdc.vi194.9620 · Cited by 6
Yang, S., Zhang, W., & Yuan, Z. (2021) · Advances in Journalism and Communication · doi:10.4236/ajc.2021.92004 · Cited by 4
Characterizing Female Workplace Bullying via Social MediaPreprint
Ahmed, S., Rajput, A., Sarirete, A., Bahwireth, R., Almehmadi, A., & Khimi, W. (2020) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202008.0536.v1 · Cited by 3
“Such techniques have been used in various disciplines such as [6] in Political Science and [7] in mental health realm.”
MethodSocial Media and the Dynamics of ProtestsPreprint
Boyer, P., Delemotte, T., Rollet, V., Gauthier, G., & Schmutz, B. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3618851 · Cited by 5
Disengaging from Reality – Online Behavior and Unpleasant Political NewsPreprint
D'Amico, L., & Tabellini, G. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4087951 · Cited by 4
Voice for the Voiceless: Active Sampling to Detect Comments Supporting the Rohingyas
Palakodety, S., KhudaBukhsh, A. R., & Carbonell, J. (2020) · AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i01.5382 · Cited by 26
“…then obtained the comments from the unlabeled corpus whose embeddings were closest to the seed embeddings (i.e. the nearest neighbors). following [44, 43] cosine distance was used as the distance metric. can someone tell me where i can help charity to countries should take a stand for these…”
MethodCross-community affinity: A polarization measure for multi-community networks
Nair, S., & Iamnitchi, A. (2024) · Online Social Networks and Media · doi:10.1016/j.osnem.2024.100280 · Cited by 3
Unsupervised Framing Analysis for Social Media Discourse in Polarizing Events
Sarmiento, H., Córdova, R., Ortiz, J., Bravo-Márquez, F., dos Santos, M. L. B., & Valenzuela, S. (2025) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3711912 · Cited by 4
“Demszky et al. [33] presented a study of 21 U.S. mass shooting events to measure polarization in common frames in X .”
Yu, Q. (2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-srw.5 · Cited by 3
“Demszky et al. (2019) investigated the usage of expressions for necessity modality (including should, must, have to and need to) among tweets about mass shooting events, as necessity modality bears the illocutionary force of calling for action or change in the discourse under discussion.”
BackgroundLinguistic and News-Sharing Polarization During the 2019 South American Protests
Cox, R. A. V., Zeng, H. S., KhudaBukhsh, A. R., & Carley, K. M. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19097-1_5 · Cited by 3
Gunning for change: A content analysis of tweets following three mass shootings in the United States
Damiano, A. D., Xie, W., & Jong, C.-H. (2023) · Atlantic Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/15456870.2023.2203495 · Cited by 3
“Demszky et al. (2019) looked at 4.4 million tweets from 21 mass shootings.”
BackgroundInfluentialJiang, K., & Xu, Q. (2021) · Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences/Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2021.360 · Cited by 3
“Despite the early euphoria about social media’s potential for bringing global democratization [3] and allowing cross-cutting interactions to promote the exchange of different political views [4], researchers are increasingly concerned about social media’s role in facilitating polarization [5].”
BackgroundKnowBias: A Novel AI Method to Detect Polarity in Online ContentPreprint
Saligrama, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.00724 · Cited by 3
“e annotated based on authorship. We envision an approach where we transfer knowledge from tweets to long text at test time. While previous work has attempted to analyze tweets for political sentiment [3], there is no research on domain adaptation from short to long documents in this context. There has been research on…”
BackgroundMethodHofmann, V., Pierrehumbert, J. B., & Schütze, H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 3
Brüggemann, M., & Meyer, H. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/5d4vq · Cited by 3
Machine Learning for Econometrics
Gaillac, C., & L’Hour, J. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780198918868.001.0001 · Cited by 2
Bukhanevych, D., Succar, R., & Porfiri, M. (2025) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0005493 · Cited by 2
“The effects of mass shootings on public discourse are well studied [27,66,67], from the general public’s interest [25] to media coverage [26], but much less is known about the response of policymakers to these tragic events.”
A Case Study of Analysis of Construals in Language on Social Media Surrounding a Crisis Event
Aboufoul, L., Mahajan, K., Gallicano, T. D., Levens, S. M., & Shaikh, S. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-srw.31 · Cited by 2
“be created using a variety of methods, and salient topics can be derived from tweets collected using both traditional LDA and non-traditional methods (Demszky et al., 2019).”
BackgroundTowards a More In-Depth Detection of Political Framing
Yu, Q. (2023) · LATECHCLFL · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.latechclfl-1.18 · Cited by 8
“Demszky et al. (2019) and Ziems and Yang (2021) inspect the usage of deon-2 tic modal verbs (e.g., ‘should’, ‘need’) in calling for actions, assigning blames and making moral arguments.”
Infrastructure Ombudsman: Mining Future Failure Concerns from Structural Disaster Response
Chowdhury, M. T. A., Datta, S., Sharma, N. K., & KhudaBukhsh, A. R. (2024) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3589334.3648153 · Cited by 2
“…scaffolding collapse , Pittsburgh bridge collapse , Fern Hollow Bridge Collapse , I-85 Overpass collapse } Keyword-based filtering is a well-established, high-recall approach to pruning datasets tailored for specific interests Demszky et al. (2019); Halterman et al. (2021); Dutta et al. (2022).”
BackgroundKurumathur, S. K., Bhatt, P., Valecha, R., Hariharan, G., & Rao, H. R. (2025) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-024-10578-8 · Cited by 3
“While the polarization literature has examined the context of mass shootings (Demszky et al., 2019) and vigilantism (Kurumathur et al., 2022), little attention has been given to understanding the public’s support for or opposition to vigilantism.”
On Positive Moderation Decisions
Samory, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18086 · Cited by 2
“I modify the topic model introduced in (Demszky et al. 2019), which combines sampling and vector spaces to encourage topics that are independent of subreddit size or focus.”
MethodThe public debate on Twitter in the Iberian sphere
Marín-Albaladejo, J. A., & Figueira, J. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003109891-10 · Cited by 2
“Both political polarization and hate speech are mainly manifested through language that activates certain frames (Demszky et al., 2019).”
Trucks Don’t Mean Trump: Diagnosing Human Error in Image Analysis
Zamfirescu-Pereira, J. D., Chen, J., Wen, E., Koenecke, A., Garg, N., & Pierson, E. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533145 · Cited by 3
“Algorithms have been used to diagnose broader cultural biases and stereotypes, often through use of word embeddings [11, 14, 25, 29]; this work differs from ours because it studies”
MethodSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Demszky, D., Garg, N., Voigt, R., Zou, J., Shapiro, J., Gentzkow, M., & Jurafsky, D.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Brown University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers)
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 2970-3005
- OpenAlex
- W2963834345
- Semantic Scholar
- 3475876c3f5e624587181744bc5acf4223aecd00
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 9.21
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- polarization, social media, tweets, mass shootings, sentiment analysis, political polarization, online discourse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-13 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review