The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Management of novel ecosystems: are novel approaches required?
Open accessAbstract
Most ecosystems are now sufficiently altered in structure and function to qualify as novel systems, and this recognition should be the starting point for ecosystem management efforts. Under the emerging biogeochemical configurations, management activities are experiments, blurring the line between basic and applied research. Responses to specific management manipulations are context specific, influenced by the current status or structure of the system, and this necessitates reference areas for management or restoration activities. Attempts to return systems to within their historical range of biotic and abiotic characteristics and processes may not be possible, and management activities directed at removing undesirable features of novel ecosystems may perpetuate or create such ecosystems. Management actions should attempt to maintain genetic and species diversity and encourage the biogeochemical characteristics that favor desirable species. Few resources currently exist to support the addition of proactive measures and rigorous experimental designs to current management activities. The necessary changes will not occur without strong input from stakeholders and policy makers, so rapid information transfer and proactive research–management activities by the scientific community are needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
Christensen, N. L., Bartuska, A. M., Brown, J. H., Carpenter, S., D'Antonio, C., Francis, R., Franklin, J. F., MacMahon, J. A., Noss, R. F., Parsons, D. J., et al. (1996) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.2307/2269460 · Cited by 1,516
Noss, R. F., Beier, P., Wallace Covington, W., Edward Grumbine, R., Lindenmayer, D. B., Prather, J. W., Schmiegelow, F., Sisk, T. D., & Vosick, D. J. (2006) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1526-100x.2006.00099.x · Cited by 108
Cited by
Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration
Hobbs, R. J., Higgs, E., & Harris, J. A. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.012 · Cited by 2,008
Self-citationInvasive Species, Environmental Change and Management, and Health
Pyšek, P., & Richardson, D. M. (2010) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-033009-095548 · Cited by 1,406
Forest responses to increasing aridity and warmth in the southwestern United States
Williams, A. P., Allen, C. D., Millar, C. I., Swetnam, T. W., Michaelsen, J., Still, C. J., & Leavitt, S. W. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0914211107 · Cited by 549
Environmental flows for natural, hybrid, and novel riverine ecosystems in a changing world
Acreman, M., Arthington, A. H., Colloff, M. J., Couch, C., Crossman, N. D., Dyer, F., Overton, I., Pollino, C. A., Stewardson, M. J., & Young, W. (2014) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/130134 · Cited by 382
Designer Ecosystems: Incorporating Design Approaches into Applied Ecology
Ross, M. R. V., Bernhardt, E. S., Doyle, M. W., & Heffernan, J. B. (2015) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-121012-100957 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Seastedt, T. R., Hobbs, R. J., & Suding, K. N.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 547-553
- ISSN
- 1540-9295 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9309
- OpenAlex
- W2064853040
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 34.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of novel ecosystems: are novel approaches required? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/070046
- The paper
- Seastedt, T. R., Hobbs, R. J., & Suding, K. N. (2008). Management of novel ecosystems: are novel approaches required? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1890/070046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.