CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 934

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment

Vilà, Montserrat, Basnou, Corina, Pyšek, Petr, Josefsson, Melanie, Genovesi, Piero, Gollasch, Stephan, Nentwig, Wolfgang, Olenin, Sergej, Roques, Alain, Roy, David, Hulme, Philip E, DAISIE partners·2010·Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
DOI 10.1890/080083
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recent comprehensive data provided through the DAISIE project ( www.europe‐aliens.org ) have facilitated the development of the first pan‐European assessment of the impacts of alien plants, vertebrates, and invertebrates – in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments – on ecosystem services. There are 1094 species with documented ecological impacts and 1347 with economic impacts. The two taxonomic groups with the most species causing impacts are terrestrial invertebrates and terrestrial plants. The North Sea is the maritime region that suffers the most impacts. Across taxa and regions, ecological and economic impacts are highly correlated. Terrestrial invertebrates create greater economic impacts than ecological impacts, while the reverse is true for terrestrial plants. Alien species from all taxonomic groups affect “supporting”, “provisioning”, “regulating”, and “cultural” services and interfere with human well‐being. Terrestrial vertebrates are responsible for the greatest range of impacts, and these are widely distributed across Europe. Here, we present a review of the financial costs, as the first step toward calculating an estimate of the economic consequences of alien species in Europe.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/080083

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.1007/s00267-009-9280-1 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s10708-005-2755-6 · DOI
  3. 10.3732/ajb.91.8.1243 · DOI
  4. Bertolino S, 2007, Aquatic alien mammals introduced into Italy: impacts and control strategies, Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats
  5. 10.1007/978-3-540-36920-2_19 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.08.014 · DOI
  7. Ciruna KA, 2004, The ecological and socio–economic impacts of invasive alien species in inland water ecosystems
  8. 10.1007/s10530-005-0236-y · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.tree.2006.07.011 · DOI
  10. 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[414:SMTNWD]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  11. D'Antonio CM, 1999, Disturbance and biological invasions: direct effects and feedbacks, Ecosystems of disturbed ground
  12. DAISIE, 2009, Handbook of alien species in Europe
  13. Desprez-Loustau ML, 2007, The fungal dimension of biological invasions, Trends Ecol Evol, 22, 472, 10.1016/j.tree.2007.04.005 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.007 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s10021-002-0151-3 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/978-94-015-9956-6_33 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/978-1-4020-8280-1_7 · DOI
  18. Gherardi F, 2007, Understanding the impact of invasive crayfish, Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats
  19. Gollasch S, 2006, The Kiel Canal, Bridging divides – maritime canals as invasion corridors
  20. 10.1641/B580312 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02358-8 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/978-94-015-9956-6_26 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01227.x · DOI
  24. 10.1039/9781847557650-00056 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01442.x · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1007/978-1-4020-8280-1_1 · DOI
  27. 10.1126/science.1171111 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s10530-008-9318-y · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.013 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00426.x · DOI
  31. Lambdon PW, 2008, Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs, Preslia, 80, 101
  32. 10.1007/978-94-015-9956-6_27 · DOI
  33. Levine JM, 2003, Mechanisms underlying the impact of exotic plant invasions, Philos T Roy Soc B, 270, 775, 10.1098/rspb.2003.2327 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02290.x · DOI
  35. Long JL, 2003, Introduced mammals of the world: their history, distribution and influence, 10.1071/9780643090156 · DOI
  36. 10.1017/S1068280500010157 · DOI
  37. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005, Ecosystem and well-being. A framework for assessment
  38. 10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0056:AMOESC]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.08.011 · DOI
  40. 10.1017/S1068280500010145 · DOI
  41. OTA (Office of Technology Assessment), 1993, Harmful non-indigenous species in the United States
  42. 10.2981/0909-6396(2007)13[159:PCOCMC]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  43. 10.1023/A:1010034312781 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00178-X · DOI
  45. 10.1079/9781845932060.0000 · DOI
  46. 10.2307/4135498 · DOI
  47. Reinhardt F, 2003, Economic impact of the spread of alien species in Germany
  48. 10.1007/978-1-4020-8280-1_5 · DOI
  49. Scalera R, 2004, Alien species and nature conservation in the EU
  50. 10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.006 · DOI
  51. van der Gaag DJ, 2007, Report workshop management of Anoplophora, 22–24 Nov 2006, Wageningen, Netherlands
  52. 10.1023/A:1010003603310 · DOI
  53. 10.1023/B:BINV.0000010122.77024.8a · DOI
  54. Vilà M, 2008, Pitas y chumberas: un caso espinoso, Invasiones biológicas
  55. Weidema I, 2006, Invasive alien fact sheet. Online database of the North European and Baltic Network on IAS
  56. 10.1201/9781420041668.ch7 · DOI
  57. 10.1201/9781420041668.ch6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vilà, M., Basnou, C., Pyšek, P., Josefsson, M., Genovesi, P., Gollasch, S., Nentwig, W., Olenin, S., Roques, A., Roy, D., Hulme, P. E., & partners, D.
Venue
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-20
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
135-144
ISSN
  • 1540-9295
  • 1540-9309
DOI
10.1890/080083
Cited by
934
References
4
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review