Cited by 121

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing habitat connectivity for ground‐dwelling animals in an urban environment

Braaker, S., Moretti, M., Boesch, R., Ghazoul, J., Obrist, M. K., Bontadina, F.·2014·Ecological Applications

Abstract

To ensure viable species populations in fragmented landscapes, individuals must be able to move between suitable habitat patches. Despite the increased interest in biodiversity assessment in urban environments, the ecological relevance of habitat connectivity in highly fragmented landscapes remains largely unknown. The first step to understanding the role of habitat connectivity in urban ecology is the challenging task of assessing connectivity in the complex patchwork of contrasting habitats that is found in cities. We developed a data‐based framework, minimizing the use of subjective assumptions, to assess habitat connectivity that consists of the following sequential steps: (1) identification of habitat preference based on empirical habitat‐use data; (2) derivation of habitat resistance surfaces evaluating various transformation functions; (3) modeling of different connectivity maps with electrical circuit theory (Circuitscape), a method considering all possible pathways across the landscape simultaneously; and (4) identification of the best connectivity map with information‐theoretic model selection. We applied this analytical framework to assess habitat connectivity for the European hedgehog Erinaceus europaeus , a model species for ground‐dwelling animals, in the city of Zurich, Switzerland, using GPS track points from 40 individuals. The best model revealed spatially explicit connectivity “pinch points,” as well as multiple habitat connections. Cross‐validation indicated the general validity of the selected connectivity model. The results show that both habitat connectivity and habitat quality affect the movement of urban hedgehogs (relative importance of the two variables was 19.2% and 80.8%, respectively), and are thus both relevant for predicting urban animal movements. Our study demonstrates that even in the complex habitat patchwork of cities, habitat connectivity plays a major role for ground‐dwelling animal movement. Data‐based habitat connectivity maps can thus serve as an important tool for city planners to identify habitat corridors and plan appropriate management and conservation measures for urban animals. The analytical framework we describe to model such connectivity maps is generally applicable to different types of habitat‐use data and can be adapted to the movement scale of the focal species. It also allows evaluation of the impact of future landscape changes or management scenarios on habitat connectivity in urban landscapes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/13-1088.1

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Circuit theory has been found suitable for characterizing relative frequency of routine movements along multiple potential paths through urban and other fragmented landscapes.

    “Still, circuit theory has been found suitable for characterizing relative frequency of routine movements along multiple potential paths through urban and other fragmented landscapes (e.g., Braaker et al. 2014; Rödder et al. 2016; Grafius et al. 2017).”

    From Circuit‐theory applications to connectivity science and conservation (2019) · cites this paper as Braaker et al. 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00242-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.2307/1940062 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00942.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0083 · DOI
  5. Biotoptypenkartierung der Stadt Zurich, 2010, Naturschutz-Inventar und Kartierungen
  6. Bontadina F, 1991, Strassenüberquerungen von Igeln (Erinaceus europaeus)
  7. Bontadina F, 1994, Igel in der Stadt. Zürich: Wildbiologie, 6
  8. 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00200-4 · DOI
  9. Burnham K. P, 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach
  10. 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0529:ACGTCM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.017 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2008.10.002 · DOI
  13. 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2349:EOSRFA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  14. Carey V. J, 2004, yags: yet another GEE solver. Version 4.0-2.1
  15. 10.1002/bimj.200610379 · DOI
  16. 10.1086/506976 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Delaney K. S, 2010, A rapid, strong, and convergent genetic response to urban habitat fragmentation in four divergent and widespread vertebrates, PLoS ONE, 5, 10.1371/journal.pone.0012767 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s10592-004-7748-3 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01899.x · DOI
  20. 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00471.x · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.04.007 · DOI
  22. ESRI, 2009, ArcMap version 9.3.1
  23. 10.1098/rspb.2008.1712 · DOI
  24. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0079 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01692.x · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00287.x · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2004.00869.x · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.016 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1126/science.1150195 · DOI
  30. 10.18637/jss.v015.i02 · DOI
  31. Hardin J. W, 2003, Generalized estimating equations
  32. 10.1016/j.ppees.2011.03.003 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01695.x · DOI
  34. 10.1890/06-0957.1 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01642.x · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01955.x · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s10980-011-9620-4 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Manly B. F. J, 2002, Resource selection by animals. Statistical design and analysis for field studies
  40. Morris P. A, 2008, Mammals of the British Isles: handbook, 241
  41. 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0900:HWDEBP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00120.x · DOI
  43. 10.1371/journal.pone.0049390 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01736.x · DOI
  45. R Development Core Team, 2011, R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Reference index version 2.13.0
  46. 10.1016/j.tree.2011.10.008 · DOI
  47. 10.1890/09-2190.1 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1017/S1367943004001313 · DOI
  49. Reeve N. J, 1994, Hedgehogs
  50. 10.1007/BF03195183 · DOI
  51. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01806.x · DOI
  52. 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00651.x · DOI
  53. 10.1007/s10980-010-9473-2 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.03.005 · DOI
  55. Savicky P, 2009, pspearman: Spearman's rank correlation test. Version 0.2-5
  56. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01970.x · DOI
  57. 10.1890/11-0815.1 · DOI
  58. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04745.x · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1007/s10531-004-5014-0 · DOI
  60. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04657.x · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1007/s00442-006-0500-6 · DOI
  62. Swisstopo, 2011, Vector25. Das digitale Landschaftsmodell der Schweiz
  63. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02040.x · DOI
  64. 10.2307/3544927 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1017/CBO9780511754821.003 · DOI
  66. 10.1007/s10980-013-9861-5 · DOI
  67. 10.18356/08b807d4-en · DOI
  68. 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1205:LCAGTP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  69. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01271.x · DOI · Paper page
  70. White G. C, 1990, Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data
  71. 10.1023/A:1016223907962 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/S0169-7439(00)00122-2 · DOI
  73. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00078.x · DOI
  74. Zingg R, 1994, Aktivität sowie Habitat- und Raumnutzung von Igeln (Erinaceus eruopaeus) in einem ländlichen Siedlungsgebiet

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Braaker, S., Moretti, M., Boesch, R., Ghazoul, J., Obrist, M. K., & Bontadina, F.
Venue
Ecological Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
1583-1595
ISSN
  • 1051-0761
  • 1939-5582
Cited by
121
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review