Cited by 25Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Eye movement desensitization reprocessing for children and adolescents with posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic narrative review

Open access
Barron, Ian G., Bourgaize, Caitlin, Lempertz, Daniela, Swinden, Colleen, Darker-Smith, Susan·2019·Journal of EMDR Practice and Research

Abstract

There is currently a limited number of studies into the efficacy of eye movement desensitization reprocessing (EMDR) therapy with children and adolescents with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The current study utilizes a systematic narrative review of methodologies and findings of previous literature reviews and meta-analyses as well as analyzing randomized control trials (RCTs) conducted from 2002 to 2018. Following initial scoping of the extent of studies, two systematic literature searches were conducted, firstly for literature reviews and secondly for recent RCTs. Nine databases were utilized. Eight reviews and seven RCTs were identified and analyzed for quality of methodology and outcome as measured by impact on PTSD symptoms. EMDR was found to be efficacious in reducing children's PTSD symptoms compared to waitlist conditions, with similar outcomes to cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). EMDR was effective with both single-event trauma as well as cumulative trauma such as sexual abuse. EMDR was equally effective with girls and boys as well as children from different cultures. EMDR achieved medium to large effect sizes. Reductions in PTSD were maintained at 2-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. In conclusion, EMDR was consistently found to be an efficacious treatment for children with PTSD. Recommendations are made for future practice and research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/1933-3196.13.4.270

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Critical Appraisal Program. (2017a). CASP systematic review checklist. Retrieved from https://casp-uk.net/wp- content/uploads/2018/01/CASP-Systematic-Review- Checklist_2018.pdf Critical Appraisal Program. (2017b). CASP systematic review checklist. Retrieved from https://casp-uk.net/wp- content/uploads/2018/01/CASP-Randomised-Control led-Trial-Checklist-2018.pdf
  2. Shapiro, F. (2001). Eye movement desensitization and repro- cessing (EMDR): Basic principles, protocols, and procedures (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  3. Shapiro, F. (2018). Eye movement desensitization and reprocess- ing (EMDR): Basic principles, protocols, and procedures (3rd ed.). London, UK: Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barron, I. G., Bourgaize, C., Lempertz, D., Swinden, C., & Darker-Smith, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • Child and Adolescent Psychotherapist, Neuwied, Germany
  • University of Chester (GB)
  • Shropshire Council (GB)
Venue
Journal of EMDR Practice and Research
Published
2019-01
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
270-283
ISSN
  • 1933-3196 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-320X
OpenAlex
W2991391909
Cited by
25
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of EMDR Practice and Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
EMDR, post-traumatic stress disorder, children, adolescents, treatment efficacy, sexual abuse, cumulative trauma, long-term treatment outcomes, gender differences, cultural differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review